{"database":"ecrin-mdr-crc","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Clinical"],"study_start_year":["1998"],"condition":["Colon Cancer","Cancer-Bowel-Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)"],"disease":["Colon Cancer","Cancer-bowel-back Passage (rectum) Or Large Bowel (colon)"],"study_type":["Interventional"],"full_dataset_link":["https://newmdr.ecrin.org/Study/2451944"],"location":["New Zealand"],"study_start_month":["1"],"repository":["ECRIN MDR"],"study_status":["Active, not recruiting"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"ALCCaS","description":"Interventions: Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer\nPrimary outcome(s): The primary aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that tumour-related disease-free interval and overall survival are equivalent, at five years following surgery, regardless of whether patients receive laparoscopic or open colon surgery[At 5 years following suregery]\nStudy Design: Purpose: Treatment; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Open (masking not used);Assignment: Single group;Type of endpoint: Safety/efficacy","dates":{"creation":"1998-01-15"},"accession":"2451944","cross_references":{"Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry":["ACTRN12605000103662"]}}