<HashMap><database>EGA</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Genomics</omics_type><technology_type>Illumina HiSeq 2000, Illumina MiSeq</technology_type><study_type>Other</study_type><full_dataset_link>https://ega-archive.org/studies/EGAS00001000625</full_dataset_link><host>EGA</host><description>EGA study EGAS00001000625</description><dataset_title>Exome sequencing of tumor samples</dataset_title><dataset_title>Targeted deep sequencing of somatic mutations</dataset_title><dataset_title>Copy number profiling using PlasmaSeq</dataset_title><category>restricted</category><repository>EGA</repository><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The management of metastatic breast cancer needs improvement. As clinical evaluation is not very accurate in determining the progression of disease, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has evolved to a promising noninvasive marker of disease evolution. Indeed, ctDNA was reported to represent a highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic cancer disease directly reflecting tumor burden and dynamics. However, at present little is known about the dynamic range of ctDNA in patients with metastatic breast cancer.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, 74 plasma DNA samples from 58 patients with metastasized breast cancer were analyzed with a microfluidic device to determine the plasma DNA size distribution and copy number changes in the plasma were identified by whole-genome sequencing (plasma-Seq). Furthermore, in an index patient we conducted whole-genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of the primary tumor, metastases, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Deep sequencing was done to accurately determine the allele fraction (AFs) of mutated DNA fragments.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Although all patients had metastatic disease, plasma analyses demonstrated highly variable AFs of mutant fragments. We analyzed an index patient with more than 100,000 CTCs in detail. We first conducted whole-genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of four different regions from the primary tumor and three metastatic lymph node regions, which enabled us to establish the phylogenetic relationships of these lesions, which were consistent with a genetically homogeneous cancer. Subsequent analyses of 551 CTCs confirmed the genetically homogeneous cancer in three serial blood analyses. However, the AFs of ctDNA were only 2% to 3% in each analysis, neither reflecting the tumor burden nor the dynamics of this progressive disease. These results together with high-resolution plasma DNA fragment sizing suggested that differences in phagocytosis and DNA degradation mechanisms likely explain the variable occurrence of mutated DNA fragments in the blood of patients with cancer.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The dynamic range of ctDNA varies substantially in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This has important implications for the use of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker.</pubmed_abstract><pubmed_title>The dynamic range of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer.</pubmed_title><pubmed_authors>Heidary Maryam M, Auer Martina M, Ulz Peter P, Heitzer Ellen E, Petru Edgar E, Gasch Christin C, Riethdorf Sabine S, Mauermann Oliver O, Lafer Ingrid I, Pristauz Gunda G, Lax Sigurd S, Pantel Klaus K, Geigl Jochen B JB, Speicher Michael R MR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Divergence between high metastatic tumor burden and  low circulating tumor DNA concentration in metastasized breast cancer</name><description>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was reported to represent a highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic cancer disease directly reflecting tumor burden and dynamics. Here we investigated the role of ctDNA in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In an index patient with more than 100,000 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in serial blood analyses, whole genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of the primary tumor, metastases, and 551 CTCs were consistent with a genetically homogeneous cancer. However, the allele fractions (AFs) of ctDNA were only 2-3% in each analysis, which did neither reflect the tumor burden nor the dynamics of this progressive disease by far. Indeed, plasma analyses of 71 further patients demonstrated highly variable AFs of mutant fragments, which frequently did not correspond to the tumor burden. These results provide insights into mechanisms involved in CTC and ctDNA release into the circulation and have important implications for diagnostic tests based on liquid biopsies.</description><dates><updated>2017-07-26 15:39:25</updated></dates><accession>EGAS00001000625</accession><cross_references><TAXONOMY>9606</TAXONOMY><pubmed>25107527</pubmed><EGA>EGAD00001000762</EGA><EGA>EGAD00001000763</EGA><EGA>EGAD00001000761</EGA><EGA>EGAC00001000072</EGA></cross_references></HashMap>