<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE301nnn/GSE301598/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><species>Homo sapiens</species><gds_type>Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE301598</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human primary and stem cell-derived islets under acute hypoxia</name><description>To understand the divergent responses of different islet sources to the hypoxic stress encountered post-transplantation, we performed a direct, comparative single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of human primary islets and stem cell-derived islets (SC-islets, HUES8 line) over an acute time course (0, 6, 24, and 48 hours) of hypoxic exposure (1% O2). Our data reveal that while both islet types activate conserved core stress pathways, they subsequently execute markedly divergent adaptive strategies. Primary β-cells navigate hypoxia through a profound suppression of their mature identity and a shift towards a quiescent, energy-conserving state. In contrast, SC-β cells mount a highly plastic and metabolically dynamic response that is coupled with significant lineage instability and functional dysregulation. These findings highlight fundamental, source-specific differences in hypoxic adaptation, providing a rich resource for developing tailored strategies to improve islet transplantation success.</description><dates><publication>2026/04/28</publication></dates><accession>GSE301598</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9086269</GSM><GPL>24676</GPL><GSE>301598</GSE><taxon>Homo sapiens</taxon></cross_references></HashMap>