<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE317nnn/GSE317131/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Genomics</omics_type><species>Mus musculus</species><gds_type>Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><gds_type> Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE317131</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>CpG content determines tissue-resident macrophage enhancer selection</name><description>Tissue-resident macrophages (TRMs) acquire specialized identities through transcription factor (TF) networks operating in distinct chromatin environments. Early growth response 2 (EGR2) contributes both to alveolar macrophage (AM) identity and to interleukin (IL)-4-driven polarization of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), yet the regulatory principles enabling its function across these contexts remain unclear. By integrating RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data from wild-type and Egr2-deficient macrophages, we show that macrophage identity is constrained by DNA methylation-dependent cis-regulatory landscapes. AM-specific enhancers are predominantly CpG-rich and hypomethylated, a feature shared with additional TRM populations, whereas BMDM-accessible regulatory regions are largely CpG-poor. Although IL-4 induces EGR2 together with KLF4 and DEC1 in BMDMs, this TF module fails to engage CpG-rich enhancers, indicating that the BMDM regulatory network lacks additional AM-specific components required for their activation. These findings identify CpG content as a determinant of enhancer competence and provide a mechanistic explanation for the context-dependent activity of EGR2 in macrophages, placing macrophage plasticity under the control of sequence-encoded epigenetic constraints.</description><dates><publication>2026/07/28</publication></dates><accession>GSE317131</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9465532</GSM><GSM>GSM9465543</GSM><GSM>GSM9465542</GSM><GSM>GSM9465531</GSM><GSM>GSM9465534</GSM><GSM>GSM9465545</GSM><GSM>GSM9465544</GSM><GSM>GSM9465533</GSM><GSM>GSM9465547</GSM><GSM>GSM9465536</GSM><GSM>GSM9465535</GSM><GSM>GSM9465546</GSM><GSM>GSM9465538</GSM><GSM>GSM9465527</GSM><GSM>GSM9465537</GSM><GSM>GSM9465548</GSM><GSM>GSM9465541</GSM><GSM>GSM9465530</GSM><GSM>GSM9465540</GSM><GSM>GSM9465529</GSM><GSM>GSM9465539</GSM><GSM>GSM9465528</GSM><GPL>19057</GPL><GPL>30172</GPL><GSE>317131</GSE><taxon>Mus musculus</taxon></cross_references></HashMap>