<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE318nnn/GSE318676/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><species>Mus musculus</species><gds_type>Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE318676</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>mRNA 3ʹ UTRs direct microRNA degradation to participate in imprinted gene networks and regulate growth dataset 5</name><description>MicroRNAs direct downregulation of target mRNAs. Sometimes, however, this regulatory paradigm inverts, and a target RNA triggers degradation of a microRNA. This target-directed microRNA degradation (TDMD) requires ZSWIM8. Zswim8-/- mice exhibit reduced growth and perinatal lethality, accompanied by stabilization of >40 microRNAs. Nonetheless, studies of TDMD function in mammals have been limited because only two TDMD-triggering RNAs have been identified in mice. Here, we computationally identify and validate five new TDMD-triggering sites in mouse models. One site in Atp6v1g1 and two in Lpar4 direct degradation of miR-335-3p, showing that in mammals, two sites in the same transcript, and multiple sites in different transcripts, can collaborate to destabilize a microRNA. Moreover, sites in Plagl1 and Lrrc58 direct degradation of miR-322 and miR-503, respectively. Mice lacking the Plagl1 and Lrrc58 sites were smaller, demonstrating that target-directed degradation of miR-322 and miR-503 promotes growth. Both miR-335-3p and Plagl1 are maternally imprinted, implying their participation in parental conflict, but their corresponding triggers or target microRNA partner are not imprinted. Thus, 3¢ UTRs can participate in parental conflict not only by regulating protein production but also directly by engaging TDMD to access an additional layer of regulation within a network of imprinted and biallelic genes.</description><dates><publication>2026/04/08</publication></dates><accession>GSE318676</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9500433</GSM><GSM>GSM9500444</GSM><GSM>GSM9500443</GSM><GSM>GSM9500432</GSM><GSM>GSM9500442</GSM><GSM>GSM9500431</GSM><GSM>GSM9500441</GSM><GSM>GSM9500430</GSM><GSM>GSM9500452</GSM><GSM>GSM9500451</GSM><GSM>GSM9500440</GSM><GSM>GSM9500450</GSM><GSM>GSM9500429</GSM><GSM>GSM9500439</GSM><GSM>GSM9500438</GSM><GSM>GSM9500449</GSM><GSM>GSM9500448</GSM><GSM>GSM9500437</GSM><GSM>GSM9500436</GSM><GSM>GSM9500447</GSM><GSM>GSM9500446</GSM><GSM>GSM9500435</GSM><GSM>GSM9500445</GSM><GSM>GSM9500434</GSM><GPL>24247</GPL><GSE>318676</GSE><taxon>Mus musculus</taxon><PMID>[41871909]</PMID></cross_references></HashMap>