<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE322nnn/GSE322775/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><species>Mus musculus</species><gds_type>Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE322775</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Coordinated immune activation following KRAS inhibition reveals molecular pathways that potentiate and limit anti-tumor immunity</name><description>While mutant-specific KRAS inhibitors are approved to treat cancer, a deeper understanding of intratumoral changes driven specifically by KRAS inhibition is needed to maximize therapeutic responses. Here we apply single-cell RNA-seq, flow cytometry, and spatial transcriptomics to distinguish mechanisms of tumor control after KRASG12C inhibition (KRAS(G12C)i), MEK inhibition (MEKi) and following combination therapy with KRAS(G12C)i and PD-1 blockade. Despite inhibiting overlapping pathways, KRAS(G12C)i drives the adaptation of distinct neoplastic cell fates affecting metabolism and cell cycle regulation, leading to synergistic tumor suppression after co-administration with MEKi. In turn, this modulates intercellular communication patterns and induces robust dendritic cell maturation and PD-1+ macrophage activation mediated through non-immune mediators. Both KRAS(G12C)i and MEKi elicit a similar magnitude of cytotoxic T-cell infiltration despite a reduced capacity for T-cell proliferation after MEKi, implicating distinct adaptive immune activation mechanisms. Combination treatment of KRAS(G12C)i with anti-PD-1 overcomes immune activation barriers by prolonging the activation window and clonal persistence for T cells and by promoting the re-wiring of pro-inflammatory macrophages associated with higher survival, Furthermore, combination treatment amplifies intercellular communication among non-PD-1+ expressing cells to perpetuate dendritic cell activation. Our findings connect neoplastic KRAS inhibition with the coordination of distinct levers for immune activation and reveal pro- and anti-tumor mechanisms that can be modulated following specific treatment types to contain malignant growth.</description><dates><publication>2026/06/27</publication></dates><accession>GSE322775</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9558221</GSM><GSM>GSM9558188</GSM><GSM>GSM9558220</GSM><GSM>GSM9558201</GSM><GSM>GSM9558223</GSM><GSM>GSM9558222</GSM><GSM>GSM9558200</GSM><GSM>GSM9558189</GSM><GSM>GSM9558225</GSM><GSM>GSM9558203</GSM><GSM>GSM9558224</GSM><GSM>GSM9558202</GSM><GSM>GSM9558227</GSM><GSM>GSM9558205</GSM><GSM>GSM9558204</GSM><GSM>GSM9558226</GSM><GSM>GSM9558207</GSM><GSM>GSM9558229</GSM><GSM>GSM9558228</GSM><GSM>GSM9558206</GSM><GSM>GSM9558209</GSM><GSM>GSM9558208</GSM><GSM>GSM9558191</GSM><GSM>GSM9558190</GSM><GSM>GSM9558193</GSM><GSM>GSM9558192</GSM><GSM>GSM9558195</GSM><GSM>GSM9558194</GSM><GSM>GSM9558230</GSM><GSM>GSM9558197</GSM><GSM>GSM9558196</GSM><GSM>GSM9558210</GSM><GSM>GSM9558199</GSM><GSM>GSM9558232</GSM><GSM>GSM9558198</GSM><GSM>GSM9558231</GSM><GSM>GSM9558234</GSM><GSM>GSM9558212</GSM><GSM>GSM9558233</GSM><GSM>GSM9558211</GSM><GSM>GSM9558214</GSM><GSM>GSM9558213</GSM><GSM>GSM9558216</GSM><GSM>GSM9558215</GSM><GSM>GSM9558218</GSM><GSM>GSM9558217</GSM><GSM>GSM9558219</GSM><GPL>34328</GPL><GSE>322775</GSE><taxon>Mus musculus</taxon></cross_references></HashMap>