<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE327nnn/GSE327331/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><species>Homo sapiens</species><gds_type>Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE327331</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Frequency and prognostic significance of genetic abnormalities in a subgroup of intermediate risk neuroblastoma patients: A SIOPEN study</name><description>PURPOSE: Intermediate-risk neuroblastoma patients >18 months of age, with non-MYCN amplified, International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) localised, unresectable or International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 3 tumors, and unfavourable histology have inferior outcomes compared to other intermediate-risk patients. This study aimed to identify genetic prognostic biomarkers within this rare subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a large, international study including chromosomal copy number in all cases, next-generation DNA sequencing in most, and telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM) and gene expression in a subset, and correlated results with patient survival. RESULTS: Among 98 tumors, 9/98 (9.2%) had oncogene amplifications (CDK4/MDM2/TERT co-amplification (n=1), CDK4/MDM2 co-amplification (n=4), CDK4 (n=2), TERT (n=1), and MYC (n=1)), while 63/98 (64.3%) had typical segmental chromosomal aberrations (tSCAs). Patients with tumors with oncogene amplification had the worst 5-year event-free survival (EFS) [0%] (p&lt;0.0001 log rank test) and 5-year overall survival (OS) [44.4% (95% CI: 21.4-92.3%)] (p &lt;0.01 log rank test). Patients with tumors harbouring tSCAs had inferior EFS compared to those with numerical chromosomal aberrations only [51.7% (95% CI: 40.6-65.8%) vs. 93.3% (95% CI: 81.5-100%)] (p &lt;0.01). Patients with p53 pathway tumor alterations (n=10) had worse EFS than those without [0% vs. 61.1% (95% CI: 50.3-74.3%)] (p &lt;0.0001, log-rank test) and worse OS [26.7% (95% CI: 8.9-80.3%) vs. 80.9% (95% CI: 71.8-91.3%)] (p&lt;0.001 log rank test). Multi-variable analysis identified tSCAs as an independent prognostic variable for EFS and oncogene amplification or p53 pathway abnormalities as independent prognostic variables for EFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Oncogene amplification and/or p53 pathway abnormalities and/or typical SCAs identify patients with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma with inferior outcome for whom intensified or alternative treatments should be considered.</description><dates><publication>2026/07/15</publication></dates><accession>GSE327331</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9653712</GSM><GSM>GSM9653713</GSM><GSM>GSM9653702</GSM><GSM>GSM9653714</GSM><GSM>GSM9653703</GSM><GSM>GSM9653715</GSM><GSM>GSM9653704</GSM><GSM>GSM9653710</GSM><GSM>GSM9653711</GSM><GSM>GSM9653709</GSM><GSM>GSM9653716</GSM><GSM>GSM9653705</GSM><GSM>GSM9653717</GSM><GSM>GSM9653706</GSM><GSM>GSM9653718</GSM><GSM>GSM9653707</GSM><GSM>GSM9653719</GSM><GSM>GSM9653708</GSM><GPL>18573</GPL><GSE>327331</GSE><taxon>Homo sapiens</taxon><PMID>[42385103]</PMID></cross_references></HashMap>