<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE337nnn/GSE337966/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Genomics</omics_type><species>Homo sapiens</species><gds_type>Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE337966</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Benchmarking CUT&amp;RUN analysis procedure using motif enrichment</name><description>We designed a benchmarking method to evaluate peak calling procedures for CUT&amp;RUN data and the effects of varying preprocessing approaches, such as fragment length filtering and spike-in calibration. To support this work, we generated new CUT&amp;RUN datasets with distinct experimental characteristics alongside publicly available datasets. In particular, we produced libraries with an average read length of approximately 133 bp—longer than typical CUT&amp;RUN read lengths—which provide higher sequencing coverage and improved read mappability. These datasets provide complementary data for evaluating how experimental characteristics influence preprocessing strategies and peak-calling performance in CUT&amp;RUN.</description><dates><publication>2026/07/18</publication></dates><accession>GSE337966</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9863665</GSM><GSM>GSM9863666</GSM><GSM>GSM9863667</GSM><GSM>GSM9863663</GSM><GSM>GSM9863664</GSM><GPL>18573</GPL><GSE>337966</GSE><taxon>Homo sapiens</taxon></cross_references></HashMap>