<HashMap><database>GEO</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Other>ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE344nnn/GSE344759/</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><species>Sus scrofa</species><gds_type>Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing</gds_type><full_dataset_link>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE344759</full_dataset_link><repository>GEO</repository><entry_type>GSE</entry_type></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cryoprotectant formulation differentially shapes cardiac and immune transcriptomes in frozen storage</name><description>Cardiac tissue slices are used widely for biobanking and pharmacological testing, yet how freezing and cryoprotection reshape their molecular state remains poorly defined. We stored porcine cardiac tissue slices at -20 °C in a conventional DMSO-containing cryomedium or DMSO-free trehalose-based formulations, with or without supplementation, and profiled transcriptomes from day 1 to day 7 together with TUNEL apoptosis and CD68 immunophenotyping. Transcriptional injury was formulation- and time-dependent, caused by freezing rather than 4 °C handling. The DMSO-containing cryomedium drove collapse of sarcomeric, calcium-handling and mitochondrial programmes, with key transcripts falling by -3 to -4.4 log2FC at day 7. DMSO-free storage preserved these programmes substantially better. The four supplemental protectants recovered myocardial metabolic programmes and attenuated necroptotic and ferroptotic signalling. Tissue-resident immunity was the most striking finding: complement, phagocytic and NET-related transcripts were preserved at day 1 in DMSO-containing storage, fell sharply in DMSO-free storage, and partially recovered by day 7, whereas DMSO-stored tissue showed progressive immune-associated activation. Immunophenotyping revealed formulation-dependent CD68+ cell density that mirrored the transcriptomic immune signature.</description><dates><publication>2026/09/01</publication></dates><accession>GSE344759</accession><cross_references><GSM>GSM9984758</GSM><GSM>GSM9984779</GSM><GSM>GSM9984757</GSM><GSM>GSM9984759</GSM><GSM>GSM9984754</GSM><GSM>GSM9984776</GSM><GSM>GSM9984775</GSM><GSM>GSM9984753</GSM><GSM>GSM9984778</GSM><GSM>GSM9984756</GSM><GSM>GSM9984755</GSM><GSM>GSM9984777</GSM><GSM>GSM9984794</GSM><GSM>GSM9984772</GSM><GSM>GSM9984793</GSM><GSM>GSM9984771</GSM><GSM>GSM9984796</GSM><GSM>GSM9984774</GSM><GSM>GSM9984773</GSM><GSM>GSM9984795</GSM><GSM>GSM9984790</GSM><GSM>GSM9984770</GSM><GSM>GSM9984792</GSM><GSM>GSM9984791</GSM><GSM>GSM9984769</GSM><GSM>GSM9984768</GSM><GSM>GSM9984787</GSM><GSM>GSM9984765</GSM><GSM>GSM9984764</GSM><GSM>GSM9984786</GSM><GSM>GSM9984767</GSM><GSM>GSM9984789</GSM><GSM>GSM9984788</GSM><GSM>GSM9984766</GSM><GSM>GSM9984761</GSM><GSM>GSM9984783</GSM><GSM>GSM9984782</GSM><GSM>GSM9984760</GSM><GSM>GSM9984785</GSM><GSM>GSM9984763</GSM><GSM>GSM9984784</GSM><GSM>GSM9984762</GSM><GSM>GSM9984781</GSM><GSM>GSM9984780</GSM><GPL>30998</GPL><GSE>344759</GSE><taxon>Sus scrofa</taxon></cross_references></HashMap>