{"database":"GNPS","file_versions":[{"headers":{"Content-Type":["application/json"]},"body":{"files":{"Other":["ftp://massive-ftp.ucsd.edu/v03/MSV000086744/"]},"type":"primary"},"statusCode":"OK","statusCodeValue":200}],"scores":{"citationCount":0,"reanalysisCount":0,"viewCount":0,"searchCount":0},"additional":{"omics_type":["Metabolomics"],"submitter":["Pieter C. Dorrestein"],"instrument_platform":["Q Exactive"],"species":["Escherichia Coli (ncbitaxon:562)","Not Applicable"],"full_dataset_link":["https://massive.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/dataset.jsp?task=cd0f29a388b74e2ab20db37c6c8f5b3e"],"submitter_email":["pdorrestein@ucsd.edu"],"submitter_affiliation":["University of California at San Diego"],"sample_protocol":[""],"repository":["GNPS"],"file_size":["95"],"ptm_modification":["MS:1002864 - No post-translational-modifications are included in the identified peptides of this dataset"],"data_protocol":[""],"citation_count":["0"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"GNPS 01212021_Chelomics-versus-native-metabolomics_benchmarking_data","description":"The chelomics approach was compared to the native metabolomics approach on culture extracts and purified standards (siderophores and domoic acid).","dates":{"publication":"Thu Jan 21 15:27:00 GMT 2021"},"accession":"MSV000086744","cross_references":{}}