ENAapplication/xmlftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/016/ERR11893316/ERR11893316_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/012/ERR11893312/ERR11893312_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/011/ERR11893311/ERR11893311_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/010/ERR11893310/ERR11893310_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/017/ERR11893317/ERR11893317_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/016/ERR11893316/ERR11893316_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/013/ERR11893313/ERR11893313_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/009/ERR11893309/ERR11893309_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/015/ERR11893315/ERR11893315_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/010/ERR11893310/ERR11893310_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/014/ERR11893314/ERR11893314_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/013/ERR11893313/ERR11893313_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/009/ERR11893309/ERR11893309_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/012/ERR11893312/ERR11893312_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/011/ERR11893311/ERR11893311_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/014/ERR11893314/ERR11893314_1.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/015/ERR11893315/ERR11893315_2.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/ERR118/017/ERR11893317/ERR11893317_1.fastq.gzprimaryOK200GenomicsEuropean Bioinformatics InstituteShanghai Tenth People's Hospitalhttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB65426ArrayExpressCandida auris wild type strain FY279 was used to tebuconazole adaptors. Transcriptomes of two adaptors, TJ42 and TJ44, were compared to wild type.ENAfalseTranscriptome analysis of tebuconazole adaptors in Candida aurisTranscriptome analysis of tebuconazole adaptors in Candida auris2023-09-052023-09-05PRJEB65426