ENAapplication/xmlftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR130/072/SRR13011172/SRR13011172.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/087/SRR18532587/SRR18532587.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/090/SRR18532590/SRR18532590.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/062/SRR25246062/SRR25246062.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/058/SRR25246058/SRR25246058.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/059/SRR25246059/SRR25246059.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/089/SRR18532589/SRR18532589.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/086/SRR18532586/SRR18532586.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/056/SRR25246056/SRR25246056.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/060/SRR25246060/SRR25246060.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/057/SRR25246057/SRR25246057.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR130/073/SRR13011173/SRR13011173.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR130/071/SRR13011171/SRR13011171.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/088/SRR18532588/SRR18532588.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR130/074/SRR13011174/SRR13011174.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR185/085/SRR18532585/SRR18532585.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/061/SRR25246061/SRR25246061.fastq.gzftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR252/055/SRR25246055/SRR25246055.fastq.gzprimary200OKGenomicsUniversity of Oviedohttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA675458eDNA metabarcoding was employed to analyze 6-liter water samples taken from nearby Atlantic coasts. Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene was used as metabarcode. The diversity and quality of OTU assignments were compared among samples, focusing on zooplankton.ENAfalsePolarstern'182023-05-192022-12-08PRJNA675458