{"database":"ENA","file_versions":[{"headers":{"Content-Type":["application/json"]},"body":{"files":{"Fastqsanger.gz":["ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/095/SRR24064895/SRR24064895_1.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/096/SRR24064896/SRR24064896_1.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/099/SRR24064899/SRR24064899_1.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/099/SRR24064899/SRR24064899_2.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/098/SRR24064898/SRR24064898_1.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/096/SRR24064896/SRR24064896_2.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/097/SRR24064897/SRR24064897_2.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/097/SRR24064897/SRR24064897_1.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/098/SRR24064898/SRR24064898_2.fastq.gz","ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR240/095/SRR24064895/SRR24064895_2.fastq.gz"]},"type":"primary"},"statusCode":"OK","statusCodeValue":200}],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Genomics"],"center_name":["Becker, Molecular Biology, LMU Munich"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA952217"],"scientific_name":["Drosophila melanogaster"],"tag":["xref:PubMed:37602401"],"long_description":["MSL2, the DNA-binding subunit of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex, cooperates with the ubiquitous protein CLAMP to bind MSL recognition elements (MREs) on the X chromosome. We explore the nature of the cooperative binding to these GA-rich, composite sequence elements in reconstituted naïve embryonic chromatin. We found that the cooperativity requires physical interaction between both proteins. Remarkably, disruption of this interaction does not lead to indirect, nucleosome-mediated cooperativity as expected, but to competition. The protein interaction apparently not only increases the affinity for composite binding sites, but also locks both proteins in a defined dimeric state that prevents competition. High Affinity Sites of MSL2 on the X chromosome contain variable numbers of MREs. We find that the cooperation between MSL2/CLAMP is not influenced by MRE clustering or arrangement, but happens largely at the level of individual MREs. The sites where MSL2/CLAMP bind strongly in vitro locate to all chromosomes and show little overlap to an expanded set of X-chromosomal MSL2 in vivo binding sites generated by CUT&RUN. Apparently, the intrinsic MSL2/CLAMP cooperativity is limited to a small selection of potential sites in vivo. This restriction must be due to components missing in our reconstitution, such as roX2 lncRNA. Overall design: Cut and Run profiles of MSL2 in S2 cell lines"],"repository":["ENA"],"description_synonyms":["CG1849, l(1)LB9, l(1)VE614, Runt, leg, Ct, DmelCG1849, Cell Lines, l(1)19Ea, Rnt, kf, CG11387, Cell, AA33, P235, lLB5, l(1)AA33, Cut, MSL2, MSL-2, DmelCG11387, l(1)B2/13.1, l(1)7Ba, RUN, Run, MSL2L1, l(1)7Bb, Line, CT, 1, 2, Cell., BcDNA:GH10590, MLS2, RNF184, LB5, Lines"],"name_synonyms":["CG1849, l(1)LB9, l(1)VE614, Runt, leg, Ct, DmelCG1849, Cell Lines, l(1)19Ea, Rnt, kf, CG11387, Cell, AA33, P235, lLB5, l(1)AA33, Cut, MSL2, MSL-2, DmelCG11387, l(1)B2/13.1, l(1)7Ba, RUN, Run, MSL2L1, l(1)7Bb, Line, CT, 1, 2, Cell., BcDNA:GH10590, MLS2, RNF184, LB5, Lines"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"MSL2 cut and run profiles in S2 cell lines","description":"MSL2 cut and run profiles in S2 cell lines","dates":{"last_updated":"2025-09-24","first_public":"2023-07-29"},"accession":"PRJNA952217","cross_references":{"GEO":["GSE228935"],"taxon":["7227"],"PubMed":["37602401"]}}