Project description:<p>Description:<br/> Experimental exposure to malaria parasites can lead to development of protective immunity, providing a foothold for the development of a malaria vaccine. The goal of this study is to investigate immune transcriptional profiles associated with malaria protective immune responses induced by experimental Chemo-Prophylaxis and Sporozoites (CPS) immunization of P. <i>falciparum</i>-naive human volunteers. Samples for this study were obtained from a CPS-immunization study conducted in 2011 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01218893), where healthy volunteers received CPS-immunization with bites from different numbers of P. <i>falciparum</i>-infected mosquitoes (three times 15 (n=5), 10 (n=9) or 5 (n=10)). Five control subjects received uninfected mosquito bites under chloroquine prophylaxis. Fifteen weeks after discontinuation of chloroquine prophylaxis, all volunteers were challenged by exposure to infected mosquito bites. </p> <p>Study Design:<br/> A maximum of 30 volunteers were divided into four groups. All volunteers received weekly chloroquine prophylaxis for a period of 13 weeks (91 days). During these 13 weeks, on days 8, 36 and 64 they were exposed to the bites of 15 mosquitoes. Group 1 (n=5, positive control) received three CPS immunizations by 15 mosquitoes infected with P. falciparum sporozoites. Group 2 (n=10) received three times 10 bites from infected mosquitoes and 5 bites from uninfected mosquitoes. Group 3 (n=10) received three times 5 bites from infected mosquitoes and 10 bites from uninfected mosquitoes. Group 4 (n=5), the negative control, received three placebo immunizations with 15 bites of uninfected mosquitoes. Fifteen weeks after discontinuation of chloroquine prophylaxis, all 30 volunteers were challenged at day 196 by the bites of 5 infectious mosquitoes and followed for 21 days. All subjects were treated with chloroquine 21 days after challenge or whenever they had a positive thick smear during that period. </p>
Project description:This dataset was created to (i) compare the protein expression of E. coli DSM613 cells infected and uninfected with phage vB_EcoS-EE09 and (ii) detect structural proteins of phage vB_EcoS-EE09. Thus, this set provides proteomic data of three setups: 1. Uninfected E. coli DSM613 (file names [file ID]: 04_22A [F40]; 13_ecolicontrol_01 [F13]; 14_ecolicontrol_02 [F14]) 2. E. coli DSM613 infected with phage vB_EcoS-EE09 (file names [file ID]: 02_13A [F39]; 27_ecoliinfected_01 [F27]; 28_ecoliinfected_02 [F28]) 3. Cell-free phage lysate of phage vB_EcoS-EE09 (sample name: 01_EE09)
Project description:Proteome data derive from three different types of cells (uninfected gADSCs, gADSCs infected with the empty lentiviral vector, and gADSCs infected with the miR-204-5p lentiviral vector).
Project description:We have investigated the dynamic host response to HIV-1 infection by systematically measuring transcriptome, proteome and phosphoproteome expression changes in infected and uninfected SupT1 CD4+ T cells at 5 time-points throughout the HIV-1 replication cycle (from 2h to 24h).
Project description:Primary human monocytes were isolated from four healthy human blood donors. Monocytes were isolated from PBMC buffy coats using plastic adherence for 4 hours. Monocytes were allowed to differentiate into macrophages over a period of 1 week. Macrophages from each of the 4 donors were split into two groups - uninfected and infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Cells in the infection group were infected with Mtb for 48 hours at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. Following incubation, uninfected and infected cells were harvested for RNA. RNA was used for next-generation RNA sequencing. Raw RNA sequencing data was processed using a HISAT2, Stringtie, Ballgown, DESeq2 pipeline. Processed data was used to measure differential expression between uninfected and infected macrophages.
Project description:Relative expression levels of mRNAs in chicken cecal epithelia experimentally infected with Eimeria tenella were measured at 4.5 days post-infection. Two weeks old chickens were uninfected (negative control) or were orally inoculated with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Cecal epithelia samples were collected from >12 birds in infected or uninfected group at 4.5 d following infections, in which samples from 4 birds were pooled together to form a total 3 biological replicates in each group. Parasite merozoites were also collected from four infected chickens at 5 d after infections. Uninfected control samples, merozoites and infection group samples were selected for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays. We used Affymetrix GeneChip chicken genome arrays to detail the chicken cecal epithelia gene expression in the control and E. tenella-infected birds.