Effect of Ovarian Hormone on Gene Expression in Rhesus Dorsal Raphe Nucleus with Rhesus Affymetrix Chip
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: A small block of the midbrain containing the dorsal raphe nucleus was obtained from ovariectomized monkeys treated with placebo, estrogen, progesterone or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the Rhesus Affymetrix chip. The results were analyzed with GCOS 1.0 Each chip represents one monkey. N=3 monkeys per treatment.
Project description:Small blocks of the midbrain containing the dorsal raphe nucleus was obtained from ovariectomized monkeys treated with placebo, estrogen, progesterone or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the human U95A Affymetrix chip. Each chip represents one monkey. N=3 monkeys per treatment.
Project description:Ovariectomized monkeys were treated with placebo, estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The brain was perfused with RNA Later plus 20% sucrose. Sections through the dorsal raphe nucleus were immunostained for TPH and then TPH positive neurons were laser captured. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the Rhesus Affymetrix chip. Each chip represents one monkey. N=2 monkeys per treatment.
Project description:A small block of the midbrain containing the dorsal raphe nucleus was obtained from ovariectomized monkeys treated with placebo, estrogen, progesterone or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the Rhesus Affymetrix chip. The results were analyzed with GCOS 1.0
Project description:Small blocks of the midbrain containing the dorsal raphe nucleus was obtained from ovariectomized monkeys treated with placebo, estrogen, progesterone or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the human U95A Affymetrix chip.
Project description:Ovariectomized monkeys were treated with placebo, estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone for one month. The brain was perfused with RNA Later plus 20% sucrose. Sections through the dorsal raphe nucleus were immunostained for TPH and then TPH positive neurons were laser captured. The RNA was extracted and hybridized to the Rhesus Affymetrix chip.
Project description:Emerging evidence suggests that estrogen and prolactin (PRL) play a key role in prostate cancer development, yet their relationship and molecular actions in prostate is not well understood. To address this issue, we made the first direct comparison of estrogen and PRL actions in the Noble rat (NBL) prostate dysplasia model. Prostatic dysplasia in lateral prostate (DLP) has been induced by elevated circulating levels of estrogen and PRL in NBL with estrogen (E2)-filled implants, while physiological level of testosterone (T) was maintained with T-filled implants. The effect of estrogen and PRL was studied by using ICI and bromocriptine (Br) as their respective blockers, both can effectively inhibited dysplasia development under T+E2 induction. Transcript expression profile of the four treatment groups (Control, T+E2, T+E2+Br, and T+E2+ICI) has been characterized in this array.
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
Project description:Bisphenol A (BPA) is primarily used to make polycarbonate plastic, with a global capacity of production exceeding 8 million tons per year. Biomonitoring studies with human urine, blood and tissue samples suggest that humans are subjected to widespread and continuous exposure to BPA. It has been well established that early life exposure to BPA predisposes the prostate gland to carcinogenesis later in life. However, it remains unknown if BPA exposure during adulthood induces benign or neoplastic pathology in the prostate. The main objective of the present study is to determine the effects of BPA exposures during adulthood on the prostate and to characterize the global transcriptional reprogramming underlying endocrine disruption by BPA. We elevated circulating levels of free BPA in Noble rats to the human-relevant internal dose range with BPA-filled Silastic implants while maintaining the physiological levels of testosterone (T) with T-filled implants. Cotreatment with T and 17β-estradiol (E2) was our reference regimen which induced preneoplastic and cancereous lesions. The T + low/high dose of BPA induced prostatic hyperplasia, low-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (LGPIN) and intraepithelial infiltration of T-lymphocytes specifically in the lateral prostate (LP). Using microarray analysis, we delineated specific impacts of low and high dose of BPA (with the T-support) on the gene expression program in LPs. Hierarchical clustering revealed that the endocrine disrupting effects of T + low dose of BPA showed partial resemblance to those of T + high dose of BPA and T+E2. In contrast, the influence of T+ high dose of BPA on the LP transcriptome was completely different from those of T + E2. Further, IPA analysis of specific T+ low or high BPA gene signature identified a transcription factor, HNF4α, as a regulatory hub affecting a number of differentially expressed genes by BPA exposures. These findings suggest that the adult rat prostate is still venerable to the endocrine disrupting effects of BPA. Perhaps chronic exposure to low dose of BPA provides a niche comprising heightened cell proliferation, inflammatory responses and disrupted gene expression program, which favor the onset and development of prostatic benign or malignant diseases in men. Rat lateral prostates were collected from untreated control and treated groups [Testosterone (T) + Estradiol (E2), T + low dose Bisphenol A (low BPA) and T + high BPA] for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays. We sought to identify transcriptional signature of BPA exposures in the lateral prostate gland.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of different mouse mammary cellular compartments (basal, luminal and stromal) under define hormone treatments: estrogen, progesterone, estrogen plus progesterone and the vehicle control. Goal was to determine the effect of ovarian hormones on mammary cellular compartment gene expression. Four-condition experiment within each cellular compartment. vehicle vs. estrogen, progesterone and estrogen plus progesterone. Biological replicates: 3 vehicle control, 4 estrogen treatment, 3 progesterone treatment, 4 estrogen plus progesterone treatment in each epithelial compartment (luminal, basal). 3 vehicle control, 3 estrogen, 3 progesterone, 3 estrogen plus progesterone in the stromal compartment.