INO80-regulated genes in S-phase after MMS treatment
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SUBMITTER: X Shen
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-18555 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Publications
Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication.
Falbo Karina B KB Alabert Constance C Katou Yuki Y Wu Su S Han Junhong J Wehr Tammy T Xiao Jing J He Xiangwei X Zhang Zhiguo Z Shi Yang Y Shirahige Katsu K Pasero Philippe P Shen Xuetong X
Nature structural & molecular biology 20091025 11
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes have been shown to participate in DNA replication in addition to transcription and DNA repair. However, the mechanisms of their involvement in DNA replication remain unclear. Here, we reveal a specific function of the yeast INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in the DNA damage tolerance pathways. Whereas INO80 is necessary for the resumption of replication at forks stalled by methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), it is not required for replication fork colla ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes have been shown to participate in DNA replication in addition to transcription and DNA repair. However, the mechanisms of their involvement in DNA replication remain unclear. Here, we reveal a specific function of the yeast INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in the DNA damage tolerance pathways. Whereas INO80 is necessary for the resumption of replication at forks stalled by methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), it is not required for replication fork collapse after treatment with hydroxyurea (HU). Mechanistically, INO80 regulates DNA damage tolerance during replication through modulation of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) ubiquitination and Rad51-mediated processing of recombination intermediates at impeded replication forks. Our findings establish a mechanistic link between INO80 and DNA damage tolerance pathways, indicating that chromatin remodeling is important for accurate DNA replication. INO80 distribution in WT cells was measured.
2010-06-20 | E-GEOD-18570 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Eukaryotic cells package their genomes around histone octamers. In response to DNA damage checkpoint kinase-induced core histone degradation leads to a 20-40% reduction in nucleosome density in yeast. To gain insights into this process we report the first comprehensive proteomic analysis of yeast chromatin and the alterations that occur in response to DNA damage. We analyzed the protein content of formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin using tandem mass tag (TMT), multiplexing and high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS), after sucrose gradient enrichment of the chromatin fraction. Quantitative damage-induced changes in the chromatin-bound proteome (called chromatome), were compared among wild-type cells and those defective for the INO80 remodeler (arp8Δ), or high mobility group box proteins (Nhp6a and Nhp6b, nhp6ΔΔ). We find massive changes in the chromatome in response to Zeocin, which are strongly attenuated in cells lacking a functional INO80 remodeler.
2021-02-02 | PXD022369 | Pride
Project description:Analysis of gene expression across the cell cycle from wild type cells, and cells expressing alleles of Yox1, Yhp1, Hcm1, and Tos4 that cannot be phosphorylated by Cdk1. Expression of S-phase and M/G1 transcripts are downregulated when phosphorylation of these factors is blocked, demonstrating that Cdk1 promotes expression of late cell cycle genes. These experiments are two-color hybridizations of RNA isolated from synchronized wild type (WT) or phosphomutant (4P) cells, compared to RNA from asyncrhonous wild type cells in mid-log phase. Wild type and mutant cells were synchronized in G1 phase, released into the cell cycle and samples collected at 15 minute intervals. Each time course was carried out in duplicate, the replicate experiment was performed as a dye swap.
2014-04-10 | E-GEOD-55121 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: Chromatin remodeling complexes facilitate the access of enzymes that mediate transcription, replication or repair of DNA by modulating nucleosome position and/or composition. Ino80 is the DNA-dependent Snf2-like ATPase subunit of a complex whose nucleosome remodeling activity requires actin-related proteins, Arp4, Arp5 and Arp8, as well as two RuvB-like DNA helicase subunits. Budding yeast mutants deficient for Ino80 function are not only hypersensitive to reagents that induce DNA double strand breaks, but also to those that impair replication fork progression. Results: To understand why ino80 mutants are sensitive to agents that perturb DNA replication, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation to map the binding sites of the Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex on four budding yeast chromosomes. We found that Ino80 and Arp5 binding sites coincide with origins of DNA replication and tRNA genes. In addition, Ino80 was bound at 67% of the promoters of genes that are sensitive to ino80 mutation. When replication forks were arrested near origins in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), the presence of the Ino80 complex at stalled forks and at unfired origins increased dramatically. Importantly, the resumption of DNA replication after release from a HU block was impaired in the absence of Ino80 activity. Mutant cells accumulated double-strand breaks as they attempted to restart replication. Consistently, ino80-deficient cells, although proficient for checkpoint activation, delay recovery from the checkpoint response. Conclusions: The Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex is enriched at stalled replication forks where it promotes the resumption of replication upon recovery from fork arrest. Keywords: ChIP-chip • The goal of the experiment Genome-wide localization of Ino80 on chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae • Keywords DNA replication, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genome tilling array (chromosome III, IV, V, VI) • Experimental factor Distribution of Ino80 in random culture Distribution of Ino80 in G1 phase Distribution of Ino80 in early S phase • Experimental design ChIP analyses: W303 background cells expressing Myc-tagged Ino80 were used for the ChIP using anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (9E11). ChIP-chip analyses: In all cases, hybridization data for ChIP fraction was compared with WCE (whole cell extract) fraction. Saccharomyces cerevisiae affymetrix genome tiling array (SC3456a520015F for chromosome III, IV, V, VI) was used. • Quality control steps taken Confirmation of several loci by quantitative real time PCR.
2008-04-10 | E-GEOD-9420 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This is transcription analysis of genes regulated by the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in S-phase of the cell cycle after MMS treatment.
2009-10-25 | GSE18555 | GEO
Project description:Haploid cells of Lachancea kluyveri were arrested in G1 phase using Saccharomices cerevisiae alpha factor. After, release in a new media, cells go synchronously through S-phase. One sample is taken every five minutes. Microarrays are used to monitor the change of DNA copy number from 1 to 2, all along the genome during S-phase. Two-condition experiment, G1 cells vs. S-phase cells at different time points. Biological replicates: 3 biological replicates.
2013-02-01 | E-GEOD-37244 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of Htz1 in wild-type and ino80 mutant yeast demonstrated that Ino80 plays a role in replacing Htz1 with H2A. Comparison of Htz1 localization in wt vs ino80 mutant yeast Prior to immunoprecipitation, cells arrested with alpha-factor or nocodazole: - The alpha-factor mating pheromone arrests yeast of the a mating type in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. - Nocodazole disrupts the polymerization of microtubules, blocking the cells from entering mitosis and arresting them in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle.
2010-12-01 | E-GEOD-25722 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:DNA lesions can block a replication fork, leading to its collapse and gross chromosomal rearrangements. To circumvent such outcomes, DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways become engaged, allowing the replisome to bypass the lesion and complete S phase in the presence of unrepaired damage. Here we demonstrate a newly identified role for NuA4, including complex components Esa1 and Yng2, on the Translesion Synthesis (TLS) branch of DDT. Moreover, Our data suggest that NuA4 functionality within the tolerance pathway is likely direct as genome-wide transcriptional analysis with esa1-L254P mutants showed little changes in the expression of TLS factors compared to wild type during MMS treatment. When Yng2 expression is restricted to G2/M, cell viability and mutagenesis rates are restored to the levels measured when only the error-free branch of DDT is disrupted, indicating that the critical role of NuA4 in TLS functions in G2, after chromosomal replication is complete. Lastly, disruption of HTZ1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone variant H2A.Z and target of NuA4, exhibits mutagenic rates of reversion that are comparable to the levels measured with NuA4 complex mutants, esa1-L254P and yng2M-NM-^T. The esa1-L254P strain was compared to wild type through a series of microarrays utilizing dye swaps with and without treatment of MMS. These included synchronized cells in G1 and S phase through alpha factor treatment. Four unique microarrays were performed each with dye swaps, comparing wild type to esa1-L254P in G1 and S phase with and without treatment with MMS. As a set of controls, four microarrays were performed comparing identical strains with and without MMS in G1 or S phase.
2015-02-21 | E-GEOD-66176 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE9233: Genome-wide localization of Ino80 and Arp5 on chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae GSE9420: Genome-wide localization of Ino80 on chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Keywords: SuperSeries Refer to individual Series
2008-04-10 | E-GEOD-9421 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Faithful DNA replication is essential for normal cell division and differentiation. In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication takes place on chromatin. This poses the critical question as to how DNA replication can progress through chromatin, which is inhibitory to all DNA-dependent processes. Here, we have developed a novel genome-wide method to measure chromatin accessibility to micrococcal nuclease that is normalized for nucleosome density, NCAM (Normalized Chromatin Accessibility to MNase) assay. This method enabled us to discover that chromatin accessibility increases specifically at and ahead of DNA replication forks in normal S phase and during replication stress. We further found that Mec1, a key regulatory ATR-like kinase in the S-phase checkpoint, is required for both normal chromatin accessibility around replication forks and replication fork rate during replication stress. In this study we sought to analyze the chromatin structural changes that take place at sites of DNA replication. To this end, we obtained yeast cell populations synchronously undergoing DNA replication by M-NM-1-factor G1 arrest and release. In order to analyze chromatin structure at sites of DNA replication we first mapped the genomic locations undergoing DNA replication to high-resolution, strand-specific microarrays tiling chromosomes III, VI, and XII, covering ~14% of the genome. Two complementary approaches were taken: (1) we mapped fork positions by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of a FLAG-tagged DNA polymerase 1 (Pol1), a replication fork component and (2) we mapped the sites of active DNA synthesis by generating DNA copy number profiles. We then analyzed chromatin structure at the sites of DNA replication by Micrococcal nuclease mononucleosome mapping and by generating histone H3 density maps. We further generated a Normalized Chromatin Accessibility to MNase (NCAM) signal by normalizing MNase mononucleosome signal for histone H3 density. NCAM signal represents a measure of nucleosome accessibility to MNase that is normalized for nucleosome content. These three approaches allowed us to assess potential changes in nucleosome positioning, nucleosome density, and nucleosome accessibility during DNA replication. We searched for changes in chromatin structure by comparing, during S phase, regions undergoing DNA replication to those not yet replicated, and also by comparing the same region before replication (not replicated, G1 arrested control) and during DNA replication in S phase. We typically harvested S phase cells at 30 or 60 minutes after release from G1 arrest. Experimental conditions included releasing cells into rich media at 24M-BM-0C or into rich media containing 200 mM Hydroxyurea (HU). Both conditions slowed down replication fork rate and made these experiments feasible. For each strain, samples for the different experiments (Chromatin for Pol1 and H3 ChIP, in vivo MNase digestion, and DNA for DNA copy number profiles) were harvested simultaneously for each time point. Therefore, comparisons between time points for each strain must be made using samples from the same replicate experiment. Our analysis included WT cells, as well as S phase checkpoint mutants (M-NM-^Tmec1 M-NM-^Tsml1 and mec1-100 M-NM-^Tsml1), as well as control strains (M-NM-^Tsml1).
2013-01-17 | E-GEOD-43548 | biostudies-arrayexpress