Prediction of Breast Cancer Estrogen Receptor Status using Machine Learning
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Gene expression profiles were generated from 199 primary breast cancer patients. Samples 1-176 were used in another study, GEO Series GSE22820, and form the training data set in this study. Sample numbers 200-222 form a validation set. This data is used to model a machine learning classifier for Estrogen Receptor Status. RNA was isolated from 199 primary breast cancer patients. A machine learning classifier was built to predict ER status using only three gene features.
Project description:Gene expression profiles were generated from 199 primary breast cancer patients. Samples 1-176 were used in another study, GEO Series GSE22820, and form the training data set in this study. Sample numbers 200-222 form a validation set. This data is used to model a machine learning classifier for Estrogen Receptor Status.
Project description:We used machine-learning algorithms to identify a hypoxia-associated methylation signature in patients with HPV negative HNSCC in the TCGA-HNSCC cohort. This current submission forms the basis of the independent validation cohort used to test the Hypoxia-M classifier in our study.
Project description:We experimented how well various supervised machine learning methods such as decision tree, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), support vector machine and random forest perform in classifying endometriosis from the control samples trained on both transcriptomics and methylomics data. The assessment was done from two different perspectives for improving classification performances: (a) implication of three different normalization techniques, and (b) implication of differential analysis using the generalized linear model (GLM). We concluded that an appropriate machine learning diagnostic pipeline for endometriosis should use TMM normalization for transcriptomics data, and quantile or voom normalization for methylomics data, GLM for feature space reduction and classification performance maximization.
Project description:We experimented how well various supervised machine learning methods such as decision tree, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), support vector machine and random forest perform in classifying endometriosis from the control samples trained on both transcriptomics and methylomics data. The assessment was done from two different perspectives for improving classification performances: (a) implication of three different normalization techniques, and (b) implication of differential analysis using the generalized linear model (GLM). We concluded that an appropriate machine learning diagnostic pipeline for endometriosis should use TMM normalization for transcriptomics data, and quantile or voom normalization for methylomics data, GLM for feature space reduction and classification performance maximization.
Project description:Efforts at finding potential biomarkers of tolerance after kidney transplantation have been hindered by limited sample size, as well as the complicated mechanisms underlying tolerance and the potential risk of rejection after immunosuppressant withdrawal. In this work, three different publicly available genome-wide expression data sets of peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) from 63 tolerant patients were used to compare 14 different machine learning models for their ability to predict spontaneous kidney graft tolerance. We found that the Best Subset Selection (BSS) regression approach was the most powerful with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 93.8% in the test group, and a specificity of 86.1% and a sensitivity of 80% in the validation group. A feature set with five genes (HLA-DOA, TCL1A, EBF1, CD79B, and PNOC) was identified using the BSS model. EBF1 downregulation was also an independent factor predictive of graft rejection and graft loss. An AUC value of 84.4% was achieved using the two-gene signature (EBF1 and HLA-DOA) as an input to our classifier. Overall, our systematic machine learning exploration suggests novel biological targets that might affect tolerance to renal allografts, and provides clinical insights that can potentially guide patient selection for immunosuppressant withdrawal.