ChIP-chip time-course from DmD8 cells with Pol II (Ser 2 and Ser 5 phosphorylated) antibody or Su(H) antibody after Notch activation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster
SUBMITTER: Sarah Bray
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-35720 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. Here we have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and have related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were cultured in Schneiders medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), 5ug/ml insulin (Sigma) and 5% penicillin / streptomycin (Sigma) according to standard protocols. Notch signalling was initiated by replacing cell media with 2mM EDTA in PBS. The cells were stimulated for 5 minutes before washing out EDTA using normal culture media. The cells were then collected at 18 time points at 0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 5M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 15M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 25M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 35M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 50M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y, 70M-bM-^@M-^Y, 80M-bM-^@M-^Y, 90M-bM-^@M-^Y, 100M-bM-^@M-^Y, 110M-bM-^@M-^Y, 120M-bM-^@M-^Y and 150M-bM-^@M-^Y after stimulation in 4 independent time trials. For control samples, for each time trial, media was replaced with fresh media to mimic the addition and removal of EDTA in corresponding experimental samples and then collected at equivalent times. For each trial 50 M-BM-5g of the untreated control RNA sample of each time point was pooled to create a trial specific reference sample. Samples from trials #1 and #3 were labelled with Cy5 and trails #2 and #4 as dye-swap with Cy3.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35557 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were collected at 7 time points (0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y and 100M-bM-^@M-^Y) after a 5 minute Notch stimulation as 3 independent replicates. Immunoprecipitation was performed with Pol II (Ser 2 and Ser 5 phosphorylated) antibody and compared to the total input DNA. Samples from replicates #1 and #3 were labelled with Cy5, and replicate #2 was labelled with Cy3 as a dye-swap.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35715 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were collected at 7 time points (0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y and 100M-bM-^@M-^Y) after a 5 minute Notch stimulation as 3 independent replicates. Immunoprecipitation was performed with Su(H) antibody and compared to the total input DNA. Samples from replicates #1 and #2 were labelled with Cy5, and replicate #3 was labelled with Cy3 as a dye-swap. For time point 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, only 2 biological replicates were obtained.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35719 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The conserved Notch pathway functions in diverse developmental and disease-related processes, requiring mechanisms to ensure appropriate target-selection and gene activation in each context. To investigate, we partitioned Drosophila chromatin into different states, based on histone modifications, establishing the preferred chromatin conditions for binding of CSL, the Notch pathway transcription factor. While most histone modifications were unchanged by CSL binding or Notch activation, rapid changes in H3K56 acetylation occurred at Notch regulated-enhancers. This modification required the histone acetyl-transferase CBP and was independent of transcription. Such rapid changes in H3K56 acetylation are a conserved indicator of enhancer activation, also occurring at mammalian Notch-regulated Hey1 and at Drosophila ecdysone-regulated genes. This core histone modification may therefore underpin the changes in chromatin accessibility needed to promote transcription following signaling activation. H3K56ac profile of control cells (KP) and of NICD overexpression cells (KN). In total 6 samples, with 2 input files (from 2 different conditions) and 2 replicates of H3K56ac ChIP samples of each condition.
2015-07-01 | E-GEOD-66221 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Our work describes novel roles for EZH2 in the specification of cortical neurons. Previous reports established the current model of EZH2-mediated control of neuronal progenitors differentiation through the regulation of their proliferation and developmental transitions. We built on these findings and studied the role of EZH2 in post-mitotic glutamatergic neurons differentiated from embryonic stem cells, a particularly relevant cell type where the impact of its regulation has thus far remained elusive. Briefly, our key results can be summarized as follows: 1. The conditional deletion of EZH2 at the moment of cell cycle exit in neural progenitors allowed us to study the role of EZH2 selectively in post-mitotic glutamatergic neurons. 2. Time course transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of H3K27me3 in absence of EZH2 revealed a significant dysregulation of transcriptional networks affecting synaptic plasticity, in particular long term depression. 3. These analyses also revealed potential novel roles of EZH2 in controlling the regulation between the glutamatergic signature and the GABAergic one, suggesting a mechanism entailing failure of Prdm13 repression, a histone methyltransferase with a known role in determining GABAergic neurons specification.
2022-03-28 | E-MTAB-11363 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Copy number variants (CNV) influence the expression of genes that map not only within, but also on their flanks. To assess the possible mechanism(s) underlying this “neighboring effect”, we compared intrachromosomal interactions and histone modifications in cell lines of patients affected by genomic disorders and control individuals. We detected alteration of intrachromosomal interactions (chromosomal looping) between the loci of affected genes and the rearranged interval using chromosome conformation capture (4C-seq). These results are consistent with the observed gene expression alterations. We also pinpointed concomitant changes in histone modifications between samples. Modified genes were often looping together, possibly forming an interacting cluster. We conclude that large genomic rearrangements can lead to chromatin conformation changes that extend far away from the structural variant, thus possibly modulating expression globally and modifying the phenotype. For example, we observe that the chromatin conformation, histone marks and relative expression levels of the AUTS2 gene, mutations of which are associated with autism and intellectual disabilities, are modified in Williams-Beuren syndrome patients cell lines. Examination of 2 different histone modifications in genomic disorders patients' cell lines.
2013-11-16 | E-GEOD-33784 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:three pairs of isogenic human mammary epithelial and fibroblast cells, were used to characterized cell type specific dna methylation using using methyla cytosin immunoprecipitation
2013-01-17 | E-MEXP-3651 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq of MEIS1 in the human megakaryocytic cell line CHRF-288-11
2012-01-04 | E-MTAB-859 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq experiments of 3xFlag-Dpf2, Oct4, Sox2 and several histone marks were performed in wild-type and Dpf2 -/- cells to investigate the effect of Dpf2 on the binding of those factors.
2018-11-23 | E-MTAB-6165 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of centromeric protein A, histone3 K4 and K9 modifications, HP1a and HP1g
2010-02-27 | E-TABM-705 | biostudies-arrayexpress