Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Genome-wide localization of exosome components to active promoters and chromatin insulators in Drosophila

ABSTRACT: Chromatin insulators are functionally conserved DNA-protein complexes that are situated throughout the genome and organize independent transcriptional domains. Previous work implicated RNA as an important cofactor in chromatin insulator activity, although the mechanisms by which RNA affects insulator activity are not yet understood. Here we identify the exosome, the highly conserved major cellular 3’ to 5’ RNA degradation machinery, as a physical interactor of CP190-dependent chromatin insulator complexes in Drosophila. High resolution genome-wide profiling of exosome by ChIP-seq in two different embryonic cell lines reveals extensive and specific overlap with the CP190, BEAF-32, and CTCF insulator proteins. Colocalization occurs mainly at promoters but also well-characterized boundary elements, such as scs, scs’, Mcp, and Fab-8. Surprisingly, exosome associates primarily with promoters but not gene bodies, arguing against simple cotranscriptional recruitment to RNA substrates. We find that exosome is recruited to chromatin in a transcription dependent manner, preferentially to highly transcribed genes. Similar to insulator proteins, exosome is also significantly enriched at divergently transcribed promoters. Directed ChIP of exosome in cell lines depleted of insulator proteins shows that CTCF is specifically required for exosome association at Mcp and Fab-8 but not other sites, suggesting that alternate mechanisms must also contribute to exosome chromatin recruitment. Taken together, our results reveal a novel relationship between exosome and chromatin insulators throughout the genome. ChIP-seq of exosome components. RNA-seq after control and exosome subunit knockdown in Drosophila cell lines.

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

SUBMITTER: Ryan Dale

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-41950 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genome-wide localization of exosome components to active promoters and chromatin insulators in Drosophila.

Lim Su Jun SJ Boyle Patrick J PJ Chinen Madoka M Dale Ryan K RK Lei Elissa P EP

Nucleic acids research 20130128 5

Chromatin insulators are functionally conserved DNA-protein complexes situated throughout the genome that organize independent transcriptional domains. Previous work implicated RNA as an important cofactor in chromatin insulator activity, although the precise mechanisms are not yet understood. Here we identify the exosome, the highly conserved major cellular 3' to 5' RNA degradation machinery, as a physical interactor of CP190-dependent chromatin insulator complexes in Drosophila. Genome-wide pr ...[more]

PMID: 23358822

Shared Molecules

Only show the datasets with similarity scores above: 0.5

Threshold

0.5

Similar Datasets

Project description:DNA sequence and local chromatin landscape act jointly to determine transcription factor (TF) binding intensity profiles. To disentangle these influences, we developed an experimental approach, called protein/DNA binding and high-throughput sequencing (PB-seq), that allows the binding energy landscape to be characterized genome-wide in the absence of chromatin. We applied our methods to the Drosophila Heat Shock Factor (HSF), which inducibly binds a target DNA sequence element (HSE) following heat shock stress. PB-seq involves incubating sheared naked genomic DNA with recombinant HSF, partitioning the HSF-bound and HSF-free DNA, and then detecting HSF-bound DNA by high throughput sequencing. We compared PB-seq binding profiles with ones observed in vivo by ChIP-seq, and developed statistical models to predict the observed departures from idealized binding patterns based on covariates describing the local chromatin environment. We found that DNase I hypersensitivity and tetra-acetylation of H4 were the most influential covariates in predicting changes in HSF binding affinity. We also investigated the extent to which DNA accessibility, as measured by digital DNase I footprinting data, could be predicted from MNase-seq data and the ChIP-chip profiles for many histone modifications and TFs, and found GAGA element associated factor (GAF), tetra-acetylation of H4, and H4K16 acetylation to be the most predictive covariates. Lastly, we generated an unbiased model of HSF binding sequences, which revealed distinct biophysical properties of the HSF/HSE interaction and a previously unrecognized substructure within the HSE. These findings provide new insights into the interplay between the genomic sequence and the chromatin landscape in determining transcription factor binding intensity. We performed an in vitro binding experiment with purified HSF and naked, sheared genomic Drosophila S2 DNA (PB-seq), to derive an accurate set of potential HSF binding sites in the Drosophila genome. HSF-bound DNA was specifically eluted and detected by high throughput sequencing. Drosophila HSF was N-terminally tagged with glutathione s-transferase and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site. The C-terminus of the recombinant HSF was fused to the 3xFLAG epitope. Recombinant HSF was purified from E. coli with glutathione resin as previously described (PMID: 20078429) , with the following modifications: HSF-3xFLAG elution was achieved by addition of 6xHistidine tagged TEV protease and TEV protease was cleared from the HSF preparation using a Nickel-NTA column. We incubated 600pM HSF and 2500ng genomic DNA (sonicated to 100-600bp fragment size as previously described in PMID: 20844575) in 1500μl final volume of 1xHSF binding buffer and let it come to equilibrium for an hour at room temperature. We added 20μl ANTI-FLAG M2 affinity gel for 10 minutes, washed 8 times with 1xHSF binding buffer to remove unbound DNA; 3xFLAG peptide was added to a final concentration of 200ng/μl to specifically elute HSF and HSF-bound DNA. The mock IP was done in the absence of recombinant HSF.

Project description:Developmental programs are implemented by regulatory interactions between Transcription Factors (TFs) and their target genes, which remain yet poorly understood. While recent studies have focused on regulatory cascades of TFs that govern early development, little is known on how these are selected and controlled the ultimate cellular effectors of terminal differentiation. We addressed this question during late Drosophila embryogenesis when the finely tuned expression of a TF, Ovo/Shavenbaby (Svb), triggers the morphological differentiation of epidermal trichomes. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray profiling to identify Svb downstream target genes and show that Svb directly regulates a large set of terminal effectors of trichome formation. Functional assays delineated 18 Svb bound sequences driving specific expression of trichome effectors, with highly similar pattern and dynamics. Coupling computational modeling to functional dissection, we further investigated the regulatory logic of these enhancers. We find that these “terminal” enhancers harbor remarkable features with respect to their functional architectures. Trichome enhancers display weak if any clustering of Svb binding sites. Moreover, the in vivo function of each site relies on its intimate context, with a critical importance of the nucleotides flanking Svb binding sites. Finally, we identify additional cis-regulatory motifs, showing a broad diversity of positioning among trichome enhancers, and that critically contribute to their activity. Taken together, these results show that trichome formation is underpinned by unexpectedly diverse modes of regulation, and shed light on the functional architecture of enhancers governing a terminal differentiation program. Chromatin from 12-14 hour old embryos expressing svb tagged with GFP (Kondo T, Plaza S, Zanet J, Benrabah E, Valenti P, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi S, Payre F, Kageyama Y: Small peptides switch the transcriptional activity of Shavenbaby during Drosophila embryogenesis. Science 2010, 329:336-339) was collected in duplicate. Chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an antiGFP antibody and input chromatin was used as a control.