Project description:PU.1 is an Ets family transcription factor that is essential for the differentiation of both myeloid and lymphoid cells. PU.1 is down-regulated in classical Hodgkin lymphoma cells via methylation of the PU.1 promoter. To evaluate whether down-regulation of PU.1 is essential for the growth of cHL cells, we generated L428 derived cell lines conditionally express PU.1 by tet-off system (designated L428tetPU.1). Conditonally expressed PU.1 by tetracycline removal induced complete growth arrest and apoptosis in L428 cells. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by PU.1, we compared gene expression profiles of L428tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction, by DNA microarray. We extracted total RNA from L428tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction by tetracycline removal. We compared gene expression profiles of KL428tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction using DNA microarray analysis. 4 independent experiments were performed with each RNA samples.
Project description:PU.1 is an Ets family transcription factor that is essential for the differentiation of both myeloid and lymphoid cells. PU.1 is down-regulated in classical Hodgkin lymphoma cells via methylation of the PU.1 promoter. To evaluate whether down-regulation of PU.1 is essential for the growth of cHL cells, we generated KM-H2 derived cell lines conditionally express PU.1 by tet-off system (designated KM-H2tetPU.1). Conditonally expressed PU.1 by tetracycline removal induced complete growth arrest and apoptosis in KM-H2 cells. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by PU.1, we compared gene expression profiles of KM-H2tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction, by DNA microarray. We extracted total RNA from KM-H2tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction by tetracycline removal. We compared gene expression profiles of KM-H2tetPU.1 cells 0, 1 and 3 days after PU.1 induction using DNA microarray analysis. 4 independent experiments were performed with each RNA samples.
Project description:Comparison between gene expression profiles of splenic stroma from wild type and lymphotoxin beta receptor knockout mice. The goal was to identify a set of genes which expression in splenic stroma is under lymphotoxin control and which can potentially be important for proper stroma development and function in secondary lymphoid organs. Total RNA isolated from mechanically separated stroma and splenocytes of wild type and LTbR-KO mice, as well as cultured spleen stroma cells from wild type mice. technical replicate - extract: A,B technical replicate - extract: C,D technical replicate - extract: E,F technical replicate - extract: G,H
Project description:High-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) are genomically complex, heterogeneous cancers with a high mortality rate, due to acquired chemoresistance and lack of targeted therapy options. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi) target the retinoblastoma (RB) signaling network, and have been successfully incorporated into treatment regimens for breast and other cancers. Here, we have compared mechanisms of response and resistance to three CDKi that target either CDK4/6 or CDK2 and abrogate E2F target gene expression. We identify CCNE1 gain and RB1 loss as mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition, whereas receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and RAS signaling is associated with CDK2 inhibitor resistance. Mechanistically, we show that ETS factors are mediators of RTK/RAS signaling that cooperate with E2F in cell cycle progression. Consequently, CDK2 inhibition sensitizes cyclin E1-driven but not RAS-driven ovarian cancer cells to platinum-based chemotherapy. In summary, this study outlines a rational approach for incorporating CDKi into treatment regimens for HGSOC. For parental HEY, two replicates per condition (control=10%, SNS032-treated, PD0332991-treated) were analyzed. For CDKi-resistant cells, two individual subclones derived from single cells were analyzed, except OAW28 sublines (two polyclonal populations per subline), OV90-PD/SNS-R (two polyclonal populations) and OV90-SNS-R-1 (polyclonal population, whereas OV90-SNS-R-2 is derived from a single colony).