Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

7 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Population Structure, and Comparative Genome Hybridization of European flor yeast reveal a unique family with few gene duplications.

ABSTRACT: Wine biological ageing is led in different countries in Europe: Spain, Italy, France, and Hungary, but until now no comparison of all these flor strains has been led. In this manuscript we investigated the population structure of these European flor strains from their microsatellite genotypes and analysed as well as their ploidy. We showed that almost all of these strains belong to the same cluster, and are mainly diploids. In order to detect a shared amplification pattern, we compared the hybridization profile on array of 6 flor strains from these four countries, and found only 2 genes amplified in the genome of 4 strains. Finally FLO11 polymorphism analysis revealed that most strains carry a 111 deletion in ICR1 non coding RNA, except a group of Jura Flor strains, which in contrast presented longer central core of the protein Flo11p. These results show that amplification is very likely not the main mechanism leading to the adaptation of flor yeast, and suggest that different adaptive itineraries can leading to an increase of hydrophobicity and velum formation. Wine and flor strains hybridization on affymetrix yeast2 arrays are compared to S288C Each strain is compared to S288C and is hybridized in duplicate or triplicate

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae x Saccharomyces kudriavzevii

SUBMITTER: Jean-Luc Legras

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-55925 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Population Structure and Comparative Genome Hybridization of European flor yeast reveal a unique group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with few gene duplications in their genome

Project description:Wine biological aging is a wine making process used to produce specific beverages in several countries in Europe, including Spain, Italy, France, and Hungary. This process involves the formation of a velum at the surface of the wine. Here, we present the first large scale comparison of all European flor strains involved in this process. We inferred the population structure of these European flor strains from their microsatellite genotype diversity and analyzed their ploidy. We show that almost all of these flor strains belong to the same cluster and are diploid, except for a few Spanish strains. Comparison of the array hybridization profile of six flor strains originating from these four countries, with that of three wine strains did not reveal any large segmental amplification. Nonetheless, some genes, including YKL221W/MCH2 and YKL222C, were amplified in the genome of four out of six flor strains. Finally, we correlated ICR1 ncRNA and FLO11 polymorphisms with flor yeast population structure, and associate the presence of wild type ICR1 and a long Flo11p with thin velum formation in a cluster of Jura strains. These results provide new insight into the diversity of flor yeast and show that combinations of different adaptive changes can lead to an increase of hydrophobicity and affect velum formation.

2014-06-01 | GSE55925 | GEO

Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the Northern European wine making environment.

Project description:The aim of this project was to evaluate the ploidy of a S. cerevisiae *S. kudriavzevii hybrid in comparison to the lab strain S288C. Other wine yeast have been icluded in the project for the global analysis. Comparison of Eg8 (2 arays) , to S288C (3 arrays), other strains V5, U13, Eg25 (2 arrays) are used to enable signal normalization acccross arrays with RMA package.

2012-02-09 | E-GEOD-31703 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray-CGH of wine yeast strains

Project description:Gene copy number comparison between similar wine yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different geographic origins. Microarray-CGH of wine strains EC1118, L-957 and LV CB compared to a common reference. Reference DNA was from laboratory strain S288C.

2010-02-13 | E-GEOD-16941 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparative genomic hybridization of wild type yeast isolated from clinical samples and wine fermentations to investigate genetic variability in yeast from different ecological niches

Project description:Using microarrays targeting the complete ORFeome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c, this study investigates the genetic variability present in wild type yeast from different ecological niches by comparative genome hybridization on array (aCGH). Genomic DNA of Saccharomyces strains isolated from clinical samples and strains from wine fermentations, either commercially available or isolated form spontaneous wine fermentations, was compared to genomic DNA of the sequenced laboratory strain S288c, using a common reference experimental design, with two dye-swap replicate hybridizations for each strain and six S288c self-self hybridizations for background noise estimation, in a total of 38 hybridizations.

2008-10-01 | E-MTAB-29 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcription profiling by array of yeast isolates at different time points during fermentation

Project description:Transcriptome analysis in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae as function of fermentation stage. Strains used were the reference strain S288C, two (06L3FF02 and 06L6FF20) isolates from the Bairrada wine region, Portugal, three (Lalvin EC-1118, Lalvin ICV D254 and AEB Fermol Rouge) wine yeast obtained commercially and one (J940047) isolate from a human patient. Fermentation was carried out in synthetic must MS300, in semi-anaerobic conditions. Cells were harvested at six time-points during fermentation: early exponential growth (T1), mid-exponential growth (T2), diauxic shift (T3), early stationary growth (T4) Mid-stationary growth (T5) and end of fermentation (T6). Hybridizations were carried out using a common reference design, using RNA obtained from S288C at T2, in dye-swap replicates, and four self-self hybridizations were performed using the common reference sample for control of the experiment background, in a total of 88 hybridizations.

2010-06-24 | E-MTAB-112 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the Northern European wine making environment.

2012-02-09 | GSE31703 | GEO

Impact of PDR8 allelic variation on yeast transcriptome profile in wine fermentation condition.

Project description:An eQTL analysis show that mutations in PDR8 gene in 59A strain versus S288c could trigger expressions variations of QDR2. In order to confirm this result and highlight other gene expression variations associated to PDR8 allelic variation, we performed an allele switch of PDR8 in 59A background (59A PDR8-S288c) and compared the transcriptomic profile of this strain to 59A. The analysis was performed in wine alcoholic fermentation conditions in stationary phase during nitrogen starvation and in alcoholic stress. PDR8 allelic variation: 9 non synonymous SNP (S288c->59A) 9(K->T), 17(S->L), 79(P->S), 198(G->D), 263(H->R), 267(T->S), 371(L->F), 550(A->G), 601(I->V).

2013-10-21 | GSE41738 | GEO

A combined genetic and genomic approach uncovers molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits

Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain. 40 samples are analysed with 2 technical replicates, using a unique reference named pool of the 30 segregants. The transcriptome of each segregant is compared to the transcriptome of the pool. The transcriptome of 5 biologic replicates of each parental strain is also compared to this reference. An haploid derivative of the commercialized wine yeast EC1118 which sequence is available (Novo et al. 2009. PNAS, 106:16333-16338) called 59A was used as industrial wine yeast. It is a prototroph strain and has a MATa sexual type. The haploid laboratory strain S288C (MATa) was used for crossing.

2011-01-19 | E-GEOD-26437 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Differential gene expression in high and low sulfide-producing yeast strains during wine fermentation

Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation.

2009-12-03 | GSE16215 | GEO

Systems-based approaches enable the development of industrial yeast strains with improved phenotypesSystems-based approaches enable the development of industrial yeast strains with improved phenotypes

Project description:Although metabolic engineering approaches have benefited the development of industrial strains enormously, they are often only partially successful, such that additional rounds of modification are generally needed to ensure microbial strains meet all the requirements of a particular process. Systems biology approaches can aid in yeast design providing an integrated view of yeast physiology and helping to identify targets for modification. Among other phenotypes, the generation of wine yeasts that are able to produce wines with reduced ethanol concentrations has been the focus of extensive research. However, while producing low-alcohol wines, these strains generally produce off-flavour metabolites as metabolic by-products. We therefore used transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics to investigate the physiological changes of such an engineered low-ethanol wine strain during wine fermentation to determine possible strategies for by-product remediation. Integration of ‘omics data led to the identification of several processes, including reactions related to the pyruvate node and redox homeostasis, as significantly different compared to a non-engineered parent strain, with acetaldehyde and 2,4,5-trimethyl 1,3-dioxolane identified as the main off-flavour metabolites. Gene remediation strategies were applied to decrease the formation of these metabolites, while maintaining the ‘low-alcohol’ phenotype.

2018-08-22 | PXD010381 | Pride

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data