Project description:Transcription signatures have been used to stratify breast cancer patients into clinically distinct subgroups. However, transcription alone does not determine protein expression. Of potentially equal importance for determining the tumor phenotype is the rate at which transcripts are translated to form protein. Protein translation is controlled to a major degree by miRNA, and cancer cells may deregulate the expression of key genes by altering the activity of relevant miRNAs. The importance of miRNA deregulation and the extent to which multiple miRNAs coordinately deregulate key proteins in breast cancer is only partly understood. To gain such insight, we analyzed genome-wide miRNA expression and mRNA/protein expression for a panel of 105 selected cancer related genes in breast carcinomas from 283 patients. The miRNA-mRNA-protein interactome for the selected genes was constructed by modeling protein expression as a joint function of mRNA and miRNA expression, considering the effect of both one miRNA at a time, and all studied miRNAs simultaneously. The interactome represents a map of the global effects of miRNAs on protein expression, capturing direct as well as indirect effects. The results reveal extensive association between miRNA and protein expression as well as coordinated effects of multiple miRNAs on individual proteins. Applying the model onto two other independent primary breast cancer cohorts confirmed the generalizability of key aspects of the interactome map. The mRNA expression profiling of 283 breast cancer samples was performed using the SurePrint G3 Human GE 8x60K one-color microarrays from Agilent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis, Low Input Quick Amp Labeling, v.6.5, May 2010). For each sample, 100 ng of RNA was amplified and hybridized on the array. Scanning was performed with Agilent Scanner G2565A, using AgilentG3_GX_1Color as profile. Signals were extracted using FE v.10.7.3.1 and protocol GE1_107_Sep09 (Agilent Technologies). Arrays were log2-transformed, quantile normalized and hospital-adjusted by subtracting from each probe value the mean probe value among samples from the same hospital. The Oslo Breast Cancer Consortium (OSBREAC)

Project description:Transcription signatures have been used to stratify breast cancer patients into clinically distinct subgroups. However, transcription alone does not determine protein expression. Of potentially equal importance for determining the tumor phenotype is the rate at which transcripts are translated to form protein. Protein translation is controlled to a major degree by miRNA, and cancer cells may deregulate the expression of key genes by altering the activity of relevant miRNAs. The importance of miRNA deregulation and the extent to which multiple miRNAs coordinately deregulate key proteins in breast cancer is only partly understood. To gain such insight, we analyzed genome-wide miRNA expression and mRNA/protein expression for a panel of 105 selected cancer related genes in breast carcinomas from 283 patients. The miRNA-mRNA-protein interactome for the selected genes was constructed by modeling protein expression as a joint function of mRNA and miRNA expression, considering the effect of both one miRNA at a time, and all studied miRNAs simultaneously. The interactome represents a map of the global effects of miRNAs on protein expression, capturing direct as well as indirect effects. The results reveal extensive association between miRNA and protein expression as well as coordinated effects of multiple miRNAs on individual proteins. Applying the model onto two other independent primary breast cancer cohorts confirmed the generalizability of key aspects of the interactome map. The miRNA expression profiling of 283 breast cancer samples was performed using the 8x15k “Human miRNA Microarray Kit release 14.0 (V2)” with design id 029297 from Agilent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In brief, 100 ng total RNA was dephosphorylated, labeled and hybridized for 20 hours, following the manufacturer’s protocol. Scanning was performed on Agilent Scanner G2565A, signals were extracted using Feature Extraction v10.7.3.1 and the subsequent data processing was performed using the GeneSpring software v11.0 (Agilent Technologies). In brief, the miRNA signal intensities were log2-transformed and normalized to the 90th percentile, and miRNAs that were detected in less than 10% of the samples were excluded. This resulted in 421 unique mature miRNAs. The Oslo Breast Cancer Consortium (OSBREAC)

Project description:Background: The global effect of copy number and epigenetic alterations on miRNA expression in cancer is poorly understood. In the present study, we integrate genome-wide copy number, DNA methylation and miRNA expression and identify genetic mechanisms underlying miRNA dysregulation in breast cancer. Results: We identify 70 miRNAs whose expression was associated with aberrations in copy number or methylation, or both. Among these, five miRNA families are represented. Interestingly, the members of these families are encoded on different chromosomes and are complementarily altered by gain or hypomethylation across the patients. In an independent breast cancer cohort of 123 patients, 41 of the 70 miRNAs were confirmed with respect to aberration pattern and association to expression. In vitro functional experiments were performed in breast cancer cell lines with miRNA mimics to evaluate the phenotype of the replicated miRNAs. let-7e-3p, which in tumors is found associated with hypermethylation, is shown to induce apoptosis and reduce cell viability, and low let-7e-3p expression is associated with poorer prognosis. The overexpression of three other miRNAs associated with copy number gain, miR-21-3p, miR-148b-3p and miR-151a-5p, increases proliferation of breast cancer cell lines. In addition, miR-151a-5p enhances the levels of phosphorylated AKT protein. Conclusions: Our data provide novel evidence of the mechanisms behind miRNA dysregulation in breast cancer. The study contributes to the understanding of how methylation and copy number aberrations influence miRNA expression, emphasizing miRNA functionality through redundant encoding, and suggests novel miRNAs important in breast cancer. The miRNA expression profiling of 149 breast cancer samples was performed using the 8x15k “Human miRNA Microarray Kit (V2)” with design id 019118 from Agilent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In brief, 100 ng total RNA was dephosphorylated, labeled and hybridized for 20 hours, following the manufacturer’s protocol. Scanning was performed on Agilent Scanner G2565A, signals were extracted using Feature Extraction v9.5 and the subsequent data processing was performed using the GeneSpring software v12.0 (Agilent Technologies). In brief, the miRNA signal intensities were log2-transformed and normalized to the 90th percentile, and miRNAs that were detected in less than 10% of the samples were excluded. This resulted in 448 unique mature miRNAs.

Project description:Background: The differential expression pattern of microRNAs (miRNAs) during mammary gland development might provide insights into their role in regulating the homeostasis of the breast epithelium. Our aim was to analyse these regulatory functions by deriving a comprehensive tissue-specific combined miRNA and mRNA expression profile of post-natal mouse mammary gland development. We measured the expression of 318 individual murine miRNAs by bead-based flow-cytometric profiling of whole mouse mammary glands throughout a 16-point developmental time course, including juvenile, puberty, mature virgin, gestation, lactation, and involution stages. In parallel whole-genome mRNA expression data were obtained. Results: One third (n = 102) of all murine miRNAs analysed were present during mammary gland development. MicroRNAs were represented in seven temporally co-expressed clusters, which were enriched for both miRNAs belonging to the same family and breast cancer-associated miRNAs. Global miRNA and mRNA expression was significantly reduced during lactation and the early stages of involution after weaning. For most detected miRNA families we did not observe systematic changes in the expression of predicted targets. For miRNA families whose targets did show significant changes, we observed inverse patterns of miRNA and target expression. The datasets are made publicly available and the combined expression profiles represent an important community resource for mammary gland biology research. Conclusions: MicroRNAs were expressed in co-regulated clusters during mammary gland development. Breast cancer-associated miRNAs were significantly enriched in these clusters. The mechanism and functional consequences of this miRNA co-regulation and its correlation with mRNA expression provide new avenues for research into mammary gland biology and generates candidates for functional validation. This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE15054: Characterisation of microRNA expression in post-natal mouse mammary gland development [gene] GSE15055: Characterisation of microRNA expression in post-natal mouse mammary gland development [miRNA] Refer to individual Series

Dataset Information

Integrated analysis reveals microRNA networks coordinately expressed with key proteins in breast cancer

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure