Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Root transcriptional profile of tomato Fe-deficient plants in response to supply with natural chelating agents.


ABSTRACT: Tomato, a Strategy I model plant for Fe deficiency, is an important economical crop. The transcriptional responses induced by Fe deficiency in tomato roots were previously described (Zamboni et al., 2012). The changes in trascriptome caused by the supply of Fe to plants starved fro 1 week were described in relation to the different nature of chelating agents (Fe-WEHS, Fe-CITRATE and Fe-PS). Transcriptional profile obtained by roots (27-d) of 21-d-old tomato plants starved of iron (0 μM Fe-EDTA) for 1 week and supplied for 1 h with 1 μM of Fe as Fe-WEHS (supply_Fe_WEHS), Fe citrate (supply_Fe_CITRATE) and Fe-PS (supply_Fe_PS). Tomato plants were hydroponically grown in all three case of Fe supply. Three different biological replicates were used for each sample repeating the experiment three times. All samples were obtained pooling roots of six plants (27-d-old).

ORGANISM(S): Solanum lycopersicum

SUBMITTER: Anita Zamboni 

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-69419 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

altmetric image

Publications

Early transcriptomic response to Fe supply in Fe-deficient tomato plants is strongly influenced by the nature of the chelating agent.

Zamboni Anita A   Zanin Laura L   Tomasi Nicola N   Avesani Linda L   Pinton Roberto R   Varanini Zeno Z   Cesco Stefano S  

BMC genomics 20160107


<h4>Background</h4>It is well known that in the rhizosphere soluble Fe sources available for plants are mainly represented by a mixture of complexes between the micronutrient and organic ligands such as carboxylates and phytosiderophores (PS) released by roots, as well as fractions of humified organic matter. The use by roots of these three natural Fe sources (Fe-citrate, Fe-PS and Fe complexed to water-extractable humic substances, Fe-WEHS) have been already studied at physiological level but t  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2012-03-22 | E-GEOD-31112 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2015-11-12 | E-GEOD-52336 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-09-18 | E-GEOD-24805 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-02-13 | E-GEOD-37568 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-05-29 | E-GEOD-26962 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-01-05 | E-GEOD-30832 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-06-30 | E-GEOD-37638 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-02-29 | E-GEOD-28120 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2016-06-15 | E-GEOD-83324 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2014-07-11 | E-GEOD-22888 | biostudies-arrayexpress