Genomic agonism and phenotypic antagonism between estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
SUBMITTER: Hari Singhal
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-80098 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-80367 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-80366 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-80365 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A murine model that mimic the decidualization and regression observed in human was used to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the dynamic processes in endometrium. Ovariectomized mice were treated sequentially with steroid hormones and then, to induce decidualization, oil was injected into the uterine lumen. A process similar to menstruation was induced by hormone-withdrawal. The uterine tissues were collected at 4 time-points after the induction of decidualization. Experiment Overall Design: The uterine tissues were collected at 36 (T1), 48 (T2), 60 (T3) and 84 hours (T4) after the last progesterone injection. There are 4 experimental animals for each time-point, and the RNAs collected from animals within the same time-point group were pooled together for Affymetrix microarray analysis using U74Av2 Chips.
2008-06-14 | E-GEOD-6359 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:17β-HSD1 expression modulates T47D transcript profile in in steroid-deprived medium. The enzyme specifically regulates apoptosis and cancer-related genes in T47D cells cultured in steroid-deprived medium. Genes that primarily involved in Cell cycle progression, such as the Cyclin A2 gene, CCNA2, are generally down-regulated whereas most genes involved in apoptosis and cell death, such as the proapoptotic gene XAF1 and FGF12, are on the contrary up-regulated by 17β-HSD1 knockdown, and 21% of the modulated genes belong to this latter functional category. This correborates with its role previously shown in increasing breast cancer cell proliferation (Aka et al, 2010) and indicates that in addition to its direct role as cell proliferation via incresing E2 and decreasing DHT, 17β-HSD1 may also be involved in oncogenesis by favoring its anti-apoptosis pathway in breast cancer cells 17β-HSD1 may also be involved in oncogenesis by favoring anti-apoptosis pathway and/or inhibiting cell survival pathway. We tested the ability of estrogen to induce or repress endogenous genes of T47D by microarray analysis. A total of 131 genes were found to increase or decrease 1.5-fold or higher in response to 17 beta-estradiol (1 nM for 48 h). Besides, the gene regulation occuring in steroid-deprived conditions showed that 17β-HSD1 modulates gene expression in steroid-independent manners. Our study thus demonstrates that 17β-HSD1 modulates the E2-independent transcription of endogenous genes in T47D cells. The E2-dependent transcription as well as the E2-independent transcription are significantly modulated by 17β-HSD1 in breast cancer cells We first report here that breast cancer cell transcript profile is independtly modulated by both 17β-HSD1 and its principale product estradiol. Microarrays was used to study the effect of 17β-HSD1 gene knockdown on gene expression and on endogenous ERG in T47D cells. The sense and antisense sequences of three 17β-HSD1 siRNAs were selected and synthesized. Scramble siRNA was used as control siRNA. Two days before transfection, T47D cells in T75 were cultured in steroid deprived medium. On the transfection day, cells in T75 flasks were trypsined and ressuspended in a fresh charcoal-treated medium. Cells were then reverse-transfected with 17β-HSD1 specific siRNAs or with negative control siRNA.Two days (48 hours) after transfection, cell culture media were replaced by fresh charcoal-treated medium containing either the steroid E2 (1 nM) or ethanol as a vehicle control, and cells were incubated for two more days before RNA extraction.
2016-09-01 | E-GEOD-77345 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2013-11-05 | E-GEOD-48379 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The expression of K-ras transgene is induced in K-rasV12+/-/Cre+/+/ROSA26R-LacZ+/+ transgenic mice uteri, which were primed with hormone treatment. Decidualization was artificially induced in these uteri and hormone injection was withdrawn to induced menstruation-like endometrial degeneration. Microarray was then used to study the molecular changes in these menstruating uteri following the K-ras activation. Uterine tissues were collected from K-ras induced and littermate controled menstruating uteri. Experiments were carried out using Illumina Mouse WG-6 BeadChips (n=6 in each group). Data were normalized in R environment using the Lumi Bioconductor package.
2010-06-20 | E-GEOD-15518 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In addition to the glucocorticoids, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is regulated by post-translational modifications, including SUMOylation. We have analyzed how SUMOylation influences the activity of endogenous GR target genes and the receptor chromatin binding by using isogenic HEK293 cells expressing wild-type GR (wtGR) or SUMOylation-defective GR (GR3KR). Gene expression profiling revealed that both dexamethasone up- and down-regulated genes are affected by the GR sumoylation and that the affected genes are significantly associated with pathways of cellular proliferation and survival. The GR3KR-expressing cells proliferated more rapidly and their anti-proliferative response to dexamethasone was less pronounced than in the wtGR-expressing cells. ChIP-seq analyses indicated that the SUMOylation modulates the chromatin occupancy of GR on several loci associated with cellular growth in a fashion which parallels with their differential dexamethasone-regulated expression between the two cell lines. Moreover, genome-wide SUMO-2/3 marks, which were generally associated with active chromatin, showed markedly higher overlap with the wtGR cistrome than with the GR3KR cistrome. In sum, our results indicate that the SUMOylation does not simply repress the GR activity, but regulates the activity of the receptor in a target locus selective fashion, playing an important role in controlling the GR activity on genes influencing cell growth. Examination of GR and SUMO-2/3 binding from isogenic HEK293 cell lines stably expressing either wtGR or GR3KR, in biological duplicates, using Illumina HiSeq 2000. GR binding from control HEK293 (FRT) cell line and input sample from FRT were used as controls for GR. Sequenced IgG sample from FRT cell line was used as control for SUMO-2/3
2013-11-05 | E-GEOD-48374 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The three-dimensional (3D) organization of the genome within the cell nucleus contributes to cell-specific gene expression in different cell types1. High-throughput 3CM-bM-^@M-^Sderived methods have revealed that the genome is segmented into contiguous topologically associating domains (TADs), which help to orchestrate gene expression changes during differentiation and development2-5. Using ChIP-Seq, Hi-C and 3D modelling techniques, we reveal that TADs regulate the rapid gene expression changes induced by progestin in T47D breast cancer cells. In response to the hormone, TADs maintain their borders and operate as discrete regulatory units in which the majority of the genes are either transcriptionally activated or repressed. Additionally, the epigenetic signatures of the TADs are coordinately modified by hormone in correlation with the transcriptional changes. Hormone-induced changes in gene activity and chromatin remodelling are accompanied by structural changes that are distinct for activated or repressed TADs. Integrative 3D modelling revealed that TADs are structurally expanded if active and compacted if repressed, and that this is accompanied by differential changes in accessibility. We thus propose that TADs function as M-bM-^@M-^\regulonsM-bM-^@M-^] to enable spatially proximal genes to be coordinately transcribed in response to hormones. T47D-MTVL human breast cancer cells were incubated with the progestin R5020 for different times at 37M-BM-:C and prepared for ChIP-Seq or Hi-C according published protocols
2014-10-06 | E-GEOD-53463 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Androgen receptor (AR) plays an important regulatory role during prostate cancer development. ARM-bM-^@M-^Ys transcriptional activity is regulated by androgenic ligands, but also by post-translational modifications. To study the role of the AR SUMOylation in genuine chromatin environment, we compared androgen-regulated gene expression and AR chromatin occupancy in PC-3 prostate cancer and HEK293 cell lines stably expressing wild-type (wt) or SUMOylation site-mutated AR (AR-K386R,K520R). Our genome-wide gene expression analyses reveal that the SUMOylation modulates the AR function in a target gene and pathway selective manner. The transcripts that are differentially regulated by androgen and SUMOylation are linked to cellular movement, cell death, cellular proliferation, cellular development and cell cycle. In line with these data, SUMOylation mutant AR cells proliferate faster and are more sensitive to apoptosis. Moreover, ChIP-seq analyses show that the SUMOylation modulates the chromatin occupancy of AR on many loci in a fashion that parallels with their differential androgen-regulated expression. De novo motif analyses show that other transcription factor-binding motifs are differentially enriched at the wtAR- and the AR-K386R,K520R-preferred genomic binding positions. Taken together, our data indicate that SUMOylation does not simply repress the AR activity, but it regulates ARM-bM-^@M-^Ys interaction with the chromatin and the receptorM-bM-^@M-^Ys target gene selection. Androgen receptor (AR) genomic binding was studied in wild-type AR (wtAR) or SUMOylation-deficient AR (AR-K2R) stably expressing cells HEK293 cells, in biological dublicates. Cells were treated 40 min either with 10 nM R1881 or EtOH (vehicle) and input was used as control (FRT_input GSM1176703).
2014-07-03 | E-GEOD-54109 | biostudies-arrayexpress