RNAseq of primary human monocyte derived macrophages (MDM) and differentiated THP-1 macrophages exposed to graphene-related (nano)materials (GRMs)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Illumina NovaSeq 6000
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
SUBMITTER: Tina Buerki
PROVIDER: E-MTAB-10099 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Publications
Gene expression profiling of human macrophages after graphene oxide and graphene nanoplatelets treatment reveals particle-specific regulation of pathways.
Korejwo Daria D Chortarea Savvina S Louka Chrysovalanto C Buljan Marija M Rothen-Rutishauser Barbara B Wick Peter P Buerki-Thurnherr Tina T
NanoImpact 20230127
Graphene and its derivatives are attractive materials envisaged to enable a wealth of novel applications in many fields including energy, electronics, composite materials or health. A comprehensive understanding of the potential adverse effects of graphene-related materials (GRM) in humans is a prerequisite to the safe use of these promising materials. Here, we exploited gene expression profiling to identify transcriptional responses and toxicity pathways induced by graphene oxide (GO) and graph ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Major- and minor-group rhinoviruses enter their host by binding to the cell surface molecules ICAM-1 and LDL-R, respectively, which are present on both macrophages and epithelial cells. Although epithelial cells are the primary site of productive HRV infection, previous studies have implicated macrophages in establishing the cytokine dysregulation that occurs during rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations. Even though major- and minor-group rhinoviruses are nearly genetically identical, these viruses do not replicate with equal success in monocyte-lineage cell lines. In human primary macrophages, differential mitochondrial activity and signaling pathway activation was observed between major- and minor-group rhinovirus upon initial HRV binding, indicating discordant receptor-dependent response to these rhinovirus types. As well, variances in phosphorylation of kinases (p38, JNK, ERK5) and transcription factors (ATF-2, CREB, CEBP-alpha) were observed between the major- and minor- group HRV treatments. The difference between major- and minor- group HRV activation of signaling pathways was confirmed through RNA-sequencing and observation of differential production of the asthma-relevant cytokines CCL20, CCL2, and IL-10. This is the first report of genetically similar viruses eliciting dissimilar cytokine release, transcription factor phosphorylation, and MAPK activation from macrophages. These results suggest that receptor dependence plays a role in establishing the inflammatory microenvironment initiated in part by monocytic-lineage cells in the human airway upon exposure to rhinovirus. RNA sequencing of monocyte-derived macrophages after mock infection or infection by HRV16 or HRV1A
2014-03-14 | E-GEOD-55271 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Macrophages are sentinels of the immune system and THP1 monocytic cells are one of the widely used models to study immune responses in macrophages. Several monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation protocols exist with phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) being widely used and accepted. However, the concentrations and durations of PMA treatment to induce differentiation varies widely in published literature. In this study, we determined the proteome expression dynamics of THP1 macrophages differentiated from monocytes by three commonly used PMA-based differentiation protocols using dimethyl labeling-based quantitative proteomics analysis. Our analysis shows that variations in PMA concentration and varying periods of rest post-stimulation result in downstream differences in proteome expression and cellular processes. We demonstrate that these differences result in altered expression of cytokines upon stimulation with different TLR ligands. Together, these findings provide a valuable resource that significantly expands the knowledge of protein expression dynamics in in vitro models of macrophages which in turn has profound impact on the immune responses being studied.
2021-09-08 | PXD015872 | Pride
Project description:The data is supplementary to the RNA-seq analysis of LPS and palmitate stimulation of THP-1 macrophages (E-MTAB-6064), where palmitate for the cell treatment was dissolved in sodium hydroxide and coupled with BSA at a molar ratio 7.5:1. Here we stimulated THP-1 macrophages with the corresponding concentration of BSA (4%) and NaOH (0.4 mM) in the presence of 10 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 24 hours added to the standard RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to estimate the effects and compared them with unstimulated THP-1 macrophages cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and 10nM PMA.
2019-05-17 | E-MTAB-6439 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We analysed the capacity of THP-1 cells (differentiated to macrophagoid cells) to recognize RNA sequences via pattern recognition receptors in vitro. Gene expression was analysed by RNA-Microarray. Cytokine production was analysed by ELISA assays. We used microarrays to investigate differential gene expression in THP-1 cell line undifferentiated in comparison with 3 days or 8 days differentiated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Microarray analysis revealed differential gene expression patterns of THP-1 when differentiated. THP-1 cells, undifferentiated, 3 days PMA-differentiated and 8 days PMA-differentiated
2015-11-09 | E-GEOD-67264 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE25137: Functional and cellular constraints that shaped the PPARg binding landscape in human and mouse macrophages: human expression GSE25426: Functional and cellular constraints that shaped the PPARg binding landscape in human and mouse macrophages: human ChIP-Seq Refer to individual Series
2011-12-01 | E-GEOD-25608 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:(1) qPCR Gene Expression Data The THP-1 cell line was sub-cloned and one clone (#5) was selected for its ability to differentiate relatively homogeneously in response to phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma). THP-1.5 was used for all subsequent experiments. THP-1.5 cells were cultured in RPMI, 10% FBS, Penicillin/Streptomycin, 10mM HEPES, 1mM Sodium Pyruvate, 50uM 2-Mercaptoethanol. THP-1.5 were treated with 30ng/ml PMA over a time-course of 96h. Total cell lysates were harvested in TRIzol reagent at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours, including an undifferentiated control. Undifferentiated cells were harvested in TRIzol reagent at the beginning of the LPS time-course. One biological replicate was prepared for each time point. Total RNA was purified from TRIzol lysates according to manufacturerâs instructions. Genespecific primer pairs were designed using Primer3 software, with an optimal primer size of 20 bases, amplification size of 140bp, and annealing temperature of 60°C. Primer sequences were designed for 2,396 candidate genes including four potential controls: GAPDH, beta actin (ACTB), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1). The RNA samples were reverse transcribed to produce cDNA and then subjected to quantitative PCR using SYBR Green (Molecular Probes) using the ABI Prism 7900HT system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with a 384-well amplification plate; genes for each sample were assayed in triplicate. Reactions were carried out in 20μL volumes in 384-well plates; each reaction contained: 0.5 U of HotStar Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen) and the manufacturerâs 1à amplification buffer adjusted to a final concentration of 1mM MgCl2, 160μM dNTPs, 1/38000 SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes), 7% DMSO, 0.4% ROX Reference Dye (Invitrogen), 300 nM of each primer (forward and reverse), and 2μL of 40-fold diluted first-strand cDNA synthesis reaction mixture (12.5ng total RNA equivalent). Polymerase activation at 95ºC for 15 min was followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 94ºC, 30 s at 60ºC, and 30 s at 72ºC. The dissociation curve analysis, which evaluates each PCR product to be amplified from single cDNA, was carried out in accordance with the manufacturerâs protocol. Expression levels were reported as Ct values. The large number of genes assayed and the replicates measures required that samples be distributed across multiple amplification plates, with an average of twelve plates per sample. Because it was envisioned that GAPDH would serve as a single-gene normalization control, this gene was included on each plate. All primer pairs were replicated in triplicates. Raw qPCR expression measures were quantified using Applied Biosystems SDS software and reported as Ct values. The Ct value represents the number of cycles or rounds of amplification required for the fluorescence of a gene or primer pair to surpass an arbitrary threshold. The magnitude of the Ct value is inversely proportional to the expression level so that a gene expressed at a high level will have a low Ct value and vice versa. Replicate Ct values were combined by averaging, with additional quality control constraints imposed by a standard filtering method developed by the RIKEN group for the preprocessing of their qPCR data. Briefly this method entails: 1. Sort the triplicate Ct values in ascending order: Ct1, Ct2, Ct3. Calculate differences between consecutive Ct values: difference1 = Ct2 â Ct1 and difference2 = Ct3 â Ct2. 2. Four regions are defined (where Region4 overrides the other regions): Region1: difference ⦠0.2, Region2: 0.2 < difference ⦠1.0, Region3: 1.0 < difference, Region4: one of the Ct values in the difference calculation is 40 If difference1 and difference2 fall in the same region, then the three replicate Ct values are averaged to give a final representative measure. If difference1 and difference2 are in different regions, then the two replicate Ct values that are in the small number region are averaged instead. This particular filtering method is specific to the data set we used here and does not represent a part of the normalization procedure itself; Alternate methods of filtering can be applied if appropriate prior to normalization. Moreover while the presentation in this manuscript has used Ct values as an example, any measure of transcript abundance, including those corrected for primer efficiency can be used as input to our data-driven methods. (2) Quantile Normalization Algorithm Quantile normalization proceeds in two stages. First, if samples are distributed across multiple plates, normalization is applied to all of the genes assayed for each sample to remove plate-to-plate effects by enforcing the same quantile distribution on each plate. Then, an overall quantile normalization is applied between samples, assuring that each sample has the same distribution of expression values as all of the other samples to be compared. A similar approach using quantile ormalization has been previously described in the context of microarray normalization. Briefly, our method entails the following steps: i) qPCR data from a single RNA sample are stored in a matrix M of dimension k (maximum number of genes or primer pairs on a plate) rows by p (number of plates) columns. Plates with differing numbers of genes are made equivalent by padded plates with missing values to constrain M to a rectangular structure. ii) Each column is sorted into ascending order and stored in matrix Mâ. The sorted columns correspond to the quantile distribution of each plate. The missing values are placed at the end of each ordered column. All calculations in quantile normalization are performed on non-missing values. iii) The average quantile distribution is calculated by taking the average of each row in Mâ. Each column in Mâ is replaced by this average quantile distribution and rearranged to have the same ordering as the original row order in M. This gives the within-sample normalized data from one RNA sample. iv) Steps analogous to 1 â 3 are repeated for each sample. Between-sample normalization is performed by storing the within-normalized data as a new matrix N of dimension k (total number of genes, in our example k = 2,396) rows by n (number of samples) columns. Steps 2 and 3 are then applied to this matrix. (3) Rank-Invariant Set Normalization Algorithm We describe an extension of this method for use on qPCR data with any number of experimental conditions or samples in which we identify a set of stably-expressed genes from within the measured expression data and then use these to adjust expression between samples. Briefly, i) qPCR data from all samples are stored in matrix R of dimension g (total number of genes or primer pairs used for all plates) rows by s (total number of samples). ii) We first select gene sets that are rank-invariant across a single sample compared to a common reference. The reference may be chosen in a variety of ways, depending on the experimental design and aims of the experiment. As described in Tseng et al., the reference may be designated as a particular sample from the experiment (e.g. time zero in a time course experiment), the average or median of all samples, or selecting the sample which is closest to the average or median of all samples. Genes are considered to be rank-invariant if they retain their ordering or rank with respect to expression across the experimental sample versus the common reference sample. We collect sets of rank-invariant genes for all of the s pairwise comparisons, relative to a common reference. We take the intersection of all s sets to obtain the final set of rank-invariant genes that is used for normalization. iii) Let αj represent the average expression value of the rank-invariant genes in sample j. (α1, â¦, αs) then represents the vector of rank-invariant average expression values for all conditions 1 to s iv) We calculate the scale f The THP-1 cell line was sub-cloned and one clone (#5) was selected for its ability to differentiate relatively homogeneously in response to phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma). THP-1.5 was used for all subsequent experiments. THP-1.5 cells were cultured in RPMI, 10% FBS, Penicillin/Streptomycin, 10mM HEPES, 1mM Sodium Pyruvate, 50uM 2-Mercaptoethanol. THP-1.5 were treated with 30ng/ml PMA over a time-course of 96h. Total cell lysates were harvested in TRIzol reagent at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours, including an undifferentiated control. Total RNA was purifed from TRIzol lysates according to manufacturerâs instructions. The RNA samples were reverse transcribed to produce cDNA and then subjected to quantitative PCR using SYBR Green (Molecular Probes) using the ABI Prism 7900HT system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,USA) with a 384-well amplification plate; genes for each sample were assayed in triplicate.
2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-15528 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study we performed an RNA-seq analysis of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and palmitate (PAL) stimulated THP-1 macrophages to study the gene regulatory mechanisms underlying classical innnate immune response and chronical inflammatory response caused by metabolic stress. This analysis was done to complement single-cell transcriptome analyses of the same cell models.
2019-05-15 | E-MTAB-6064 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genome-wide comparisons of transcription factor binding sites in different species allow for a direct evaluation of the evolutionary constraints that shape transcription factor binding landscapes. To gain insights into the evolution of the PPARg-dependent transcriptional network we obtained binding data for PPARg, RXR and PU.1 in human macrophages and compared the profiles to matching data from mouse macrophages. We found that PPARg binding was highly divergent and only 5% of the PPARg bound regions were occupied in both species. Despite the low conservation of PPARg binding sites, conserved PPARg target genes contribute more than 30% to the functional target genes identified in human macrophages. In addition conserved target genes are strongly enriched for lipid metabolic functions. We detected the lineage-specification factor PU.1 at the majority of human PPARg binding sites. This confirmed the juxtaposed binding configuration found in mouse macrophages and demonstrated the preservation of tissue-specific adjacent PPARg-Pu.1 binding in the absence of individual binding site conservation. Finally, based on this of PPARg and PU.1 binding between human and mouse we suggest a mechanism by which PU.1 facilitates PPARg binding site turnover in macrophages. Comparison of RNAs level in Rosiglitazone (RSG) and vehicle (DMSO) treated PMA differentiated THP-1 cells over a timecourse from 0.5h to 12h
2011-12-01 | E-GEOD-25137 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Global kinase activity induced by cytokines IL-32g and IL-17A/F were determined using peptide arrays representing phophorylation targets The objective of this study was to identify common and unique phosphorylation targets of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-32 and IL-17. These cytokines are associated with the pathogenesis and severity of chronic inflammatory disorders, therefore signaling intermediates of these cytokines could be beneficial as alternate theraputic targets that may likely influence different inflammatory pathways. Phosphorylation of proteins is a critical mechanism in the regulation of cellular processes. This process is meticulously regulated by enzymes known as kinases, which are increasingly being identified as drug targets for a variety of diseases. In this study we interrogated kinase activities (kinome) induced in the presence of the human recombinant cytokines IL-32g and IL-17A/F employing peptide arrays representing 300 peptides, printed in triplicate, representing select phosphorylation events. Human macrophage-like THP-1 cells were used for this comparative kinome analysis. Macrophage-like THP-1 cells were stimulated with either IL-32g (20 ng/ml) or IL-17A/F (20 ng/ml) for 15 min, and the peptide arrays were used to comprehensively analyze protein phosphorylation profiles in the presence of these cytokines. Two independet biological experiments were performed and the kinoem analysis was done in triplicates for each. The phosphorylations of the peptides on the array were quantified in the cytokine-treated cells relative to the un-stimulated control cells. Differentially phosphorylated targets were defined as greater than 1.5 fold increase or decrease (p < 0.06) in phosphorylation compared to un-stimulated control cells.
2011-04-16 | E-GEOD-28649 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:R. conorii (pathogenic) and R. montanensis (non-pathogenic) display opposite survival versus death phenotypes in macrophage-like cells, respectively. We herein employed a global transcriptomic profiling of host responses to infection (1hpi) of human THP-1 macrophages with R. conorii and R. montanensis. Shortly, total RNA was harvested from uninfected, R. conorii- and R. montanensis-infected THP-1 macrophages, DNA was removed from RNA purification (DNAse treatment), ribosomal RNA was depleted and cDNA libraries were constructed. The samples were sequenced using an Ion Proton V2 chip on Ion Chef Instrument. The programmes Cufflinks and Cuffmerge were used to map transcripts and calculate gene expression, and Cuffdiff was used to calculate which samples had genes, which were statistically significantly differentially expressed between conditions.
2019-12-01 | E-MTAB-6724 | biostudies-arrayexpress