Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

RNA-seq of Tfh cells from BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice immunized with OVA-IFA or OVA-CpG

ABSTRACT: The aim of the project was the identification of the transcriptional signature of effector T cells and Tfh cells that emerge following immunization with different adjuvants. For this purpose OVA-specific TCR-transgenic cells (from DO11.10 or OT-II mice) were adoptively transferred into congenic BALB/c or C57Bl/6 mice, subsequently immunized with OVA-IFA or OVA-CpG. At day 11, the OVA-specific T effector and Tfh cells were FACS sorted from the draining lymph nodes for RNA sequencing.

INSTRUMENT(S): NextSeq 550

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

SUBMITTER: Luis Graca

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-12086 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Molecular Pathways and Transcriptional Networks Involved in the Macrophage Response to LPS, poly(I:C) and CpG DNA Stimulation Background: Toll-like family of receptors recognizes pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from different organisms. TLR4 is the receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), dsRNA viral mimic poly(I:C) binds to TLR3, and bacterial CpG DNA signals through TLR9. TLR4 signaling is mediated by adaptor molecules Myd88 and TRIF while TLR3 pathway involves only the TRIF adaptor and TLR9 signals solely through Myd88. Methods: To identify genes other than those in TLR pathways that mediate macrophage response to different PAMPs, RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with LPS, poly(I:C), or CpG DNA, and RNA was profiled on microarrays 6 hrs and 24 hrs post-treatment. Gene expression data were analyzed to determine genes, pathways and transcriptional networks that are in common and unique to each of the three TLR stimuli. Potentially novel candidates revealed by this analysis were tested for their role in innate immunity using RNA interference. Results: Many genes are differentially regulated by LPS and poly(I:C) at both 6 hrs and 24 hrs following treatment, while CpG DNA elicits a much less pronounced transcriptional response. By analyzing gene expression data for networks and pathways, we prioritized differentially expressed genes that are in common to all three PAMPs as well as those shared by LPS and poly(I:C). Knockdown by RNA interference of two genes, Plec1 and TPST1, inhibited production of IL-6 in response to LPS in cultured macrophages. Conclusions: We have identified novel innate immunity genes that may be important in macrophage response to LPS, poly(I:C), and CpG DNA stimuli. Our results provide potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets that should be further investigated in mice and human populations. For each treatment (LPS, polyIC, CpG DNA, media only), three biological replicates (separate macrophage cultures and RNA isolations) were profiled. Each sample was labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 and co-hybridized with Stratagene Universal Mouse Reference (dye flip techical replicates). Expression at 2 timepoints (6 and 24 hours post-treatment) was assessed.

Dataset Information

RNA-seq of Tfh cells from BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice immunized with OVA-IFA or OVA-CpG

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure