Comparative analysis of the Illumina Mouse Methylation BeadChip and Reduced Representation Bisulphite Sequencing for routine DNA methylation analysis of murine samples
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background: Researching the murine epigenome in disease models has been hampered by the lack of an appropriate and cost-effective DNA methylation array. Until recently, investigators have been limited to the relatively expensive and analysis intensive bisulphite sequencing methods. Here, we performed a comprehensive, comparative analysis between the new Mouse Methylation BeadChip (MMB) and reduced representation bisulphite sequencing (RRBS) in two murine models of colorectal carcinogenesis, providing insight into the utility to each platforms in a real world environment. Results: We captured 1.47x106 CpGs by RRBS and 2.64x105 CpGs by MMB, mapping to 13,778 and 13,365 CpG islands, respectively. RRBS captured significantly more CpGs per island (median 41 for RRBS versus 2 for MMB). We found
INSTRUMENT(S): Illumina NovaSeq 6000
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
SUBMITTER: Lochlan Fennell
PROVIDER: E-MTAB-12214 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
ACCESS DATA