Transcriptional profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 wild-type vs their delta-nrdR mutant in aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 delta nrdR
SUBMITTER: Eduard Torrents
PROVIDER: E-MTAB-3006 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a food-borne pathogen that causes bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hfq is an sRNA chaperone protein that is involved in post-transcriptional regulation of virulence genes in pathogenic bacteria. In EHEC strain EDL933, Hfq acts a negative regulator of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) that encodes most of the proteins involved in type three secretion and attaching and effacing lesions. We deleted hfq in E. coli O157:H7 strain 86-24 and compared global transcription profiles of the hfq mutant to the wild type strain in exponential growth phase. Deletion of hfq affected transcription of genes common to nonpathogenic and pathogenic strains of E. coli as well as pathogen-specific genes. Downregulated genes in the hfq mutant included ler as well as genes encoded in LEE2-5 that encode for type three secretion and AE lesion formation. Decreased expression of the LEE genes in the hfq mutant occurred at mid-, late, and stationary growth phases in both LB and DMEM media as detected by qRT-PCR. We also confirmed decreased regulation of the LEE genes by examining secreted proteins and AE lesion formation by the hfq mutant and WT strains. Deletion of hfq also caused decreased expression of the two-component system qseBC involved in inter-kingdom signaling and virulence gene regulation in EHEC as well as an increase in stx2AB expression that encodes for the deadly Shiga toxin. Altogether, these data indicate that Hfq plays a different regulatory role in EHEC 86-24 from what has been reported for EHEC strain EDL933 and that the role of Hfq in EHEC virulence regulation extends beyond the LEE. Comparison of transcriptional regulation of the WT 86-24 isolate and the hfq mutant for the identification of regulated targets that were followed up by functional analysis.
2012-01-06 | E-GEOD-30893 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The goals of this experiment was to obtain a transcriptional profile of EHEC 86-24 upon deletion of fusK or fusR genes. The samples were grown in DMEM until late logaritmic phase then RNA was extracted using the TriZol method.
2012-11-30 | E-GEOD-34991 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genes identified in ETEC E24377A after interaction with host cells (Caco-2) after time points of 30 min, 60 min and 120 min. Both the adherent and non-adherent cells were profiled as well as E24377a grown only in tissue culture media. Each time and sample has at least duplicate samples
2012-11-26 | E-GEOD-40427 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparison of wild type S. flexneri 2457T gene expression to deletion mutant of S. flexneri 2457T gene S4473 at three growth phases and intracellularly Broth culture was grown to mid-log in LB, intracellular growth was 3 hours post invasion of HCT-8 cell (colonic epithelial cell line).
2013-10-18 | E-GEOD-40851 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) colonizes the large intestine and causes attaching and effacing lesions (AE). Most of the genes involved in the formation of AE lesions are encoded within a chromosomal pathogenicity island termed the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE). The LysR-like transcriptional factor QseA regulates the LEE by binding directly to the regulatory region of ler. Here, we performed transcriptome analyses comparing WT EHEC and the isogenic qseA mutant in order to elucidate the extent of QseA’s role in gene regulation in EHEC. The following results compare genes that were up-regulated and down-regulated ! 2-fold in the qseA mutant strain compared to the WT strain. At mid-exponential growth, 222 genes were up-regulated and 1874 were downregulated. At late-exponential growth, a total of 55 genes were up-regulated and 605 genes were down-regulated. During mid-exponential growth, QseA represses its own transcription, whereas during late-logarithmic growth, QseA activates expression of the LEE genes as well as non-LEE encoded effector proteins. During both growth phases, several genes carried in O-islands, were activated by QseA, whereas genes involved in cell metabolism were repressed. We also performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments, and DNAseI footprints, and the results suggested that QseA directly binds both the ler proximal and distal promoters, its own promoter, as well as promoters of genes encoded in EHEC-specific O-islands. Additionally, we mapped the transcriptional start site of qseA, leading to the identification of two promoter sequences. Taken together, these results indicate that QseA acts as a global regulator in EHEC, coordinating expression of virulence genes. Design of the study was to make the knockout of the qseA gene and compare the transcriptional response to that and the wild type.
2010-09-07 | E-GEOD-18118 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A study on the effects of an sdiA mutant and the AHL molecule on the virulence of EHEC Comparison of wild type E. coli 8624 with and without AHL to and E. coli 8624 sdiA mutant with and without AHL to determine the effects of each factor on gene expression
2010-04-09 | E-GEOD-13562 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Escherichia coli 8624 and the isogenic mutants in qseE, qseF and qseG are compared to determine the role that each of the genes play in regulation of the transcriptome. These results are verified by qRT-PCR and reveal the important role of this three-component signaling system. Escherichia coli 8624 and the isogenic mutants in qseE, qseF and qseG are compared to determine the role that each of the genes play in regulation of the transcriptome. Single Affymetrix E. coli 2.0 Arrays are used as a starting point for this study and these results are further verified by qRT-PCR.
2010-04-05 | E-GEOD-12831 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The ability to respond to stress is at the core of an organismâs survival. The hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine play a central role in stress responses in mammals, which require the synchronized interaction of the whole neuroendocrine system. Bacteria also sense and respond to epinephrine and norepinephrine as a means to gauge the metabolic and immune state of the host. Mammalian adrenergic receptors are G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs), bacteria, however, sense these hormones through histidine sensor kinases (HKs). HKs autophosphorylate in response to multiple signals and transfer this phosphate to response regulators (RRs). Two bacterial adrenergic receptors have been identified in EHEC, QseC and QseE, with QseE being downstream of QseC in this signaling cascade. We mapped the QseC signaling cascade in the deadly pathogen enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), which exploits this signaling system to promote disease. Through QseC, EHEC activates expression of metabolic, virulence and stress response genes, synchronizing the cell response to these stress hormones. Coordination of these responses is achieved by QseC phosphorylating three of the thirty two EHEC RRs. The QseB RR, which is QseCâs cognate RR, activates the flagella regulon which controls bacteria motility and chemotaxis. The QseF RR, which is phosphorylated by the QseE adrenergic sensor, coordinates expression of virulence genes involved in formation of lesions in the intestinal epithelia by EHEC, and the bacterial SOS stress response. The third RR, KdpE, controls potassium uptake, osmolarity response, and also the formation of lesions in the intestine. Adrenergic regulation of bacterial gene expression shares several parallels with mammalian adrenergic signaling having profound effects in the whole organism. Understanding adrenergic regulation of a bacterial cell is a powerful approach to study the underlying mechanisms of stress and cellular survival. Experiment Overall Design: Microarray comparisons reveal some trends with respect to signaling cascades. Comparative methods were used to identify networks.
2009-11-16 | E-GEOD-15050 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We aim to compare global transcriptomic analysis of wt and delta-nrdRmutant in Escherichia coli LF82 strain.
2015-02-02 | E-MTAB-2288 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We aim to compare global transcriptomic analysis of wt and delta nrdRmutant in Escherichia coli LF82 strain.
2016-06-27 | E-MTAB-2295 | biostudies-arrayexpress