Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Innate gene signature distinguishes humoral versus cytotoxic responses to influenza vaccination

ABSTRACT: Whole blood transcriptomics analysis of healthy individuals, immunized with the trivalent 2012-2013 season flu vaccine via transcutaneous, intramuscular or intradermal route. We define an early gene expression profile, detected at day 1 after immunization, that is associated with the development of either humoral or cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses. We used System Biology approach to analyse vaccine efficacy in order to find innate predictive biomarkers of the quality of adaptive responses for potential clinical use in the future. Moreover, from a methodological point of view this study increases knowledges on how vaccine route(s) can affect resulting immune responses and into mechanisms involved in the induction of humoral and cellular immunity to influenza vaccination.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Elena Goncalves

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-7741 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Using whole-blood transcriptional profiling, we investigated differences in the host response to vaccination and challenge in a rhesus macaque AIDS vaccine trial. Samples were collected from animals prior to and after vaccination with live irradiated vaccine cells secreting the modified endoplasmic reticulum chaperone gp96-Ig loaded with SIV peptides, either alone or in combination with a SIV-gp120 protein boost. Additional samples were collected following multiple low-dose rectal challenge with SIVmac251. Animals in the boosted group had a 73% reduced risk of infection. Surprisingly, few changes in gene expression were observed during the vaccination phase. Focusing on post-challenge comparisons, in particular for protected animals, we identified a host response signature of protection comprised of strong interferon signaling after the first challenge, which then largely abated after further challenges. We also identified a host response signature, comprised of early macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses, in animals with undetectable viral load five days after the first challenge, but which had unusually high viral titers after subsequent challenges. Statistical analysis showed that prime-boost vaccination significantly lowered the probability of infection in a time-consistent manner throughout several challenges. Given that humoral responses in the prime-boost group were highly significant pre-challenge correlates of protection, the strong innate signaling after the first challenge suggests that interferon signaling enhances vaccine-induced antibody responses and is an important contributor to protection from infection during repeated low-dose exposure to SIV. 36 Indian-origin outbred, young adult, male and female rhesus macaques divided into thre vaccination groups of 12 animals each. Groups were balanced for Mamu-A*01 (three in each group), Mamu-B*08 (one in each group), and for susceptible and resistant TRIM5α alleles. There were no Mamu-B*17+ animals. The prime group (PG) received Gp96 SIV Ig vaccine 292 cells that were transfected with plasmids encoding gp96-Ig, SIVmac251 rev-tat-nef, Gag and gp160 (35). They were injected intraperitoneally with 107 irradiated gp96SIVIg vaccine cells in HBSS, which secrete 10 μg of gp96SIVIg per 24 h. For the prime-boost group (PBG), 100 g of rSIVgp120 protein was added to the vaccine cells. The control group received 292-gp96 Ig cells not transfected with SIV antigens. After a 32-week vaccination phase, which consisted of priming in weeks 0, 6, and 25 and (for the PBG only) additional boosts in weeks 6 and 25, all animals were subject to up to seven weekly low-dose intrarectal challenges starting at 33-week with SIVmac251 at a dosage of 120 TCID50. Whenever an animal had detectable viral load (>50 copies/ml of plasma) at 5 days post challenge, it was considered viremic, further challenges were suspended, and only viral load screening continued on a weekly basis. Whole blood samples (preserved in PAXgene tubes) were collected 2 weeks prior to the first prime, 1 week after the first prime, 2 weeks before and 1 week after the third prime, 1 week before the first challenge, for newly infected animals five days into the corresponding study week and from viremic animals four days into the study week (also denoted as challenge 2 and challenge 3). Total RNA was isolated from Paxgene tubes using Paxgene Blood RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was assessed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using the nanochip format, and only intact RNA was used for microarray analyses.

Dataset Information

Innate gene signature distinguishes humoral versus cytotoxic responses to influenza vaccination

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure