Dataset Information

Shortest Distance From Fovea to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Border Is Important in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To identify factors influencing visual outcome in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) and subfoveal hemorrhage (SFH) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

Anti-VEGF-treated eyes with SFH > 1 disc area (DA) were identified (n = 16) and changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to last follow-up, along with SFH area, thickness, minimum distance from fovea to SFH border, and time to resolution, were determined.

Results

At baseline, mean (± standard error of the mean) size and thickness of SFH were 14.9 ± 2.8 DA and 386.6 ± 46.9 μm, and mean Snellen VA and CST were 20/250 and 591.7 ± 57.0 μm. Median follow-up was 47.6 months. While more than 50% of patients had VA ≤ 20/200 at baseline and all time points through week 48, the percentage of patients with VA ≥ 20/50 increased to 30%-40% at months 6 and 12 and remained stable through month 48. Spearman rank correlation demonstrated 2 independent variables that correlated with good visual outcome, smaller area of SFH at baseline (r = -0.630; P = .009), and high frequency of anti-VEGF injections (r = 0.646; P = .007). In exceptional patients with good visual outcome despite large baseline SFH, shortest distance between the fovea and hemorrhage border significantly correlated with baseline VA (r = -0.503, P = .047) and final VA (r = -0.575, P = .02).

Conclusions

Patients with NVAMD and thick SFH, but short distance between fovea and uninvolved retina, can have good visual outcomes when given frequent anti-VEGF injections.

SUBMITTER: Kherani S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10020831 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Shortest Distance From Fovea to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Border Is Important in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Kherani Saleema S Scott Adrienne W AW Wenick Adam S AS Zimmer-Galler Ingrid I Brady Christopher J CJ Sodhi Akrit A Meyerle Catherine C Solomon Sharon D SD Shaukat Rimsha R Channa Roomasa R Adeyemo Olukemi O Handa James T JT Wang Jiangxia J Campochiaro Peter A PA

American journal of ophthalmology 20180228

<h4>Purpose</h4>To identify factors influencing visual outcome in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) and subfoveal hemorrhage (SFH) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective case series.<h4>Methods</h4>Anti-VEGF-treated eyes with SFH > 1 disc area (DA) were identified (n = 16) and changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to last follow-up, along with SFH area, thickness, ...[more]

PMID: 29499174

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate retinal fluid volume data extracted from optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans by artificial intelligence algorithms in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD).DesignPerspective.MethodsA review was performed of retinal image repository datasets from diverse clinical settings.SettingsClinical trial (HARBOR) and trial follow-on (Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 10-year Follow-On); real-world (Belfast and Tel-Aviv tertiary centers).Patients24,362 scans of 1,095 eyes (HARBOR); 4,673 of 880 (Belfast); 1,470 of 132 (Tel-Aviv); 511 of 511 (Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 10-year Follow-On). ObservationProcedures: Vienna Fluid Monitor or Notal OCT Analyzer applied to macular cube scans. OutcomeMeasures: Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) volumes.ResultsThe fluid volumes measured in neovascular AMD were expressed efficiently in nanoliters. Large ranges that differed by population were observed at the treatment-naïve stage: 0-3,435 nL (IRF), 0-5,018 nL (SRF), and 0-10,022 nL (PED). Mean volumes decreased rapidly and consistently with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. During maintenance therapy, mean IRF volumes were highest in Tel-Aviv (100 nL), lower in Belfast and HARBOR-Pro Re Nata, and lowest in HARBOR-monthly (21 nL). Mean SRF volumes were low in all: 30 nL (HARBOR-monthly) and 48-49 nL (others).ConclusionsQuantitative measures of IRF, SRF, and PED are important biomarkers in NV-AMD. Accurate volumes can be extracted efficiently from OCT scans by artificial intelligence algorithms to guide the treatment of exudative macular diseases. Automated fluid monitoring identifies fluid characteristics in different NV-AMD populations at baseline and during follow-up. For consistency between studies, we propose the nanoliter as a convenient unit. We explore the advantages of using these quantitative metrics in clinical practice and research.

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, bevacizumab is used off-label to treat AMD, despite the absence of similar supporting data.MethodsIn a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 1208 patients with neovascular AMD to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly schedule or as needed with monthly evaluation. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity at 1 year, with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters on the eye chart.ResultsBevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly, with 8.0 and 8.5 letters gained, respectively. Bevacizumab administered as needed was equivalent to ranibizumab as needed, with 5.9 and 6.8 letters gained, respectively. Ranibizumab as needed was equivalent to monthly ranibizumab, although the comparison between bevacizumab as needed and monthly bevacizumab was inconclusive. The mean decrease in central retinal thickness was greater in the ranibizumab-monthly group (196 μm) than in the other groups (152 to 168 μm, P=0.03 by analysis of variance). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar for patients receiving either bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P>0.20). The proportion of patients with serious systemic adverse events (primarily hospitalizations) was higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (24.1% vs. 19.0%; risk ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.66), with excess events broadly distributed in disease categories not identified in previous studies as areas of concern.ConclusionsAt 1 year, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity when administered according to the same schedule. Ranibizumab given as needed with monthly evaluation had effects on vision that were equivalent to those of ranibizumab administered monthly. Differences in rates of serious adverse events require further study. (Funded by the National Eye Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00593450.).

Dataset Information

Shortest Distance From Fovea to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Border Is Important in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Shortest Distance From Fovea to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Border Is Important in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets