Evaluating the Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry in Children According to Race.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ruppel H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10028535 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Evaluating the Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry in Children According to Race.
Ruppel Halley H Makeneni Spandana S Faerber Jennifer A JA Lane-Fall Meghan B MB Foglia Elizabeth E EE O'Byrne Michael L ML Bonafide Christopher P CP
JAMA pediatrics 20230501 5
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8972025 | biostudies-literature
Project description:For critically ill adults, oxygen saturation is continuously monitored using pulse oximetry (Spo2) as a surrogate for arterial oxygen saturation (Sao2). Skin pigmentation may affect accuracy of Spo2 by introducing error from statistical bias, variance, or both. We evaluated relationships between race, Spo2, Sao2, and hypoxemia (Sao2 < 88%) or hyperoxemia (Pao2 > 150 mm Hg) among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical ICU.DesignSingle-center, observational study.SettingMedical ICU at an academic medical center.PatientsCritically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation from July 2018 to February 2021, excluding patients with COVID-19, with race documented as Black or White in the electronic medical record, who had a pair of Spo2 and Sao2 measurements collected within 10 minutes of each other.InterventionsNone.MeasurementsWe included 1,024 patients with 5,557 paired measurements within 10 minutes, of which 3,885 (70%) were within 1 minute. Of all pairs, 769 (14%) were from Black patients and 4,788 (86%) were from White patients. In analyses using a mixed-effects model, we found that across the range of Spo2 values of 92-98%, the associated Sao2 value was approximately 1% point lower for Black patients compared with White patients. Among patients with a Spo2 value between 92% and 96%, Black patients were more likely to have both hypoxemia (3.5% vs 1.1%; p = 0.002) and hyperoxemia (4.7% vs 2.4%; p = 0.03), compared with White patients.ConclusionsAmong patients with a measured Spo2 of 92-96%, greater variation in Sao2 values at a given Spo2 resulted in a higher occurence rate of both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia for Black patients compared with White patients.
| S-EPMC9478292 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10998150 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Continuous monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) is the main method to guide respiratory and oxygen support in neonates during postnatal stabilization and after admission to neonatal intensive care unit. The accuracy of these devices is therefore crucial. The presence of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) in neonatal blood might affect SpO2 readings. We performed a systematic qualitative review to investigate the impact of HbF on SpO2 accuracy in neonates. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health database (CINAHL) and Cochrane library databases were searched from inception to January 2021 for human studies in the English language, which compared arterial oxygen saturations (SaO2) from neonatal blood with SpO2 readings and included HbF measurements in their reports. Ten observational studies were included. Eight studies reported SpO2-SaO2 bias that ranged from -3.6%, standard deviation (SD) 2.3%, to +4.2% (SD 2.4). However, it remains unclear to what extent this depends on HbF. Five studies showed that an increase in HbF changes the relation of partial oxygen pressure (paO2) to SpO2, which is physiologically explained by the leftward shift in oxygen dissociation curve. It is important to be aware of this shift when treating a neonate, especially for the lower SpO2 limits in preterm neonates to avoid undetected hypoxia.
| S-EPMC8145233 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesPulse oximetry (Sp o2 ) may overestimate arterial oxygen saturation (Sa o2 ) in blood laboratory testing. This study aimed to assess Sp o2 -Sa o2 difference in relation to race (i.e., patient self-reporting as Black or White), occult hypoxemia, and length of stay (LOS) in pediatric patients with COVID-19.DesignSingle-center retrospective study in pediatric COVID-19 patients. We used multivariable linear regressions to examine the association between race and oximetry measurements and between occult hypoxemia and LOS. Oximetry bias was defined using Sp o2 and Sa o2 data according to approved comparisons. Occult hypoxemia was defined as Sp o2 greater than 92% and Sa o2 less than 88%.SettingQuaternary pediatric hospital.PatientsPediatric COVID-19 patients admitted to Texas Children's Hospital between May 2020 and December 2021.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsThere were 2713 patients with complete physiological data in the analysis. Of the total, 61% were Black, and 39% were White. Oximetry bias was greater in Black compared with White patients ( p < 0.001), and this bias increased as the oxygen saturations decreased ( p < 0.001). Black and White patients had a 12% and 4% prevalence of occult hypoxemia, respectively ( p < 0.001). LOS was not associated with oximetry bias or occult hypoxemia once controlled for the level of support (intensive care, respiratory, circulatory).ConclusionsWe found an oximetry bias in the measurement of Sp o2 with respect to Sa o2 in symptomatic hospitalized pediatric patients with the diagnosis of COVID-19. Furthermore, race is related to an increased oximetry bias. However, we did not find a relationship between oximetry bias and the LOS in the hospital in this cohort of patients.
| S-EPMC10226388 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPhotoplethysmography (PPG) is a technology routinely used in clinical practice to assess blood oxygenation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR). Skin pigmentation may influence accuracy, leading to health outcomes disparities.ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis primarily aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PPG-derived SpO2 and PR by skin pigmentation. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate statistical biases and the clinical relevance of PPG-derived SpO2 and PR according to skin pigmentation.MethodsWe identified 23 pulse oximetry studies (n=59,684; 197,353 paired SpO2-arterial blood observations) and 4 wearable PR studies (n=176; 140,771 paired PPG-electrocardiography observations). We evaluated accuracy according to skin pigmentation group by comparing SpO2 accuracy root-mean-square values to the regulatory threshold of 3% and PR 95% limits of agreement values to +5 or -5 beats per minute (bpm), according to the standards of the American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, and the International Electrotechnical Commission. We evaluated biases and clinical relevance using mean bias and 95% CI.ResultsFor SpO2, accuracy root-mean-square values were 3.96%, 4.71%, and 4.15%, and pooled mean biases were 0.70% (95% CI 0.17%-1.22%), 0.27% (95% CI -0.64% to 1.19%), and 1.27% (95% CI 0.58%-1.95%) for light, medium, and dark pigmentation, respectively. For PR, 95% limits of agreement values were from -16.02 to 13.54, from -18.62 to 16.84, and from -33.69 to 32.54, and pooled mean biases were -1.24 (95% CI -5.31 to 2.83) bpm, -0.89 (95% CI -3.70 to 1.93) bpm, and -0.57 (95% CI -9.44 to 8.29) bpm for light, medium, and dark pigmentation, respectively.ConclusionsSpO2 and PR measurements may be inaccurate across all skin pigmentation groups, breaching U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance and industry standard thresholds. Pulse oximeters significantly overestimate SpO2 for both light and dark skin pigmentation, but this overestimation may not be clinically relevant. PRs obtained from wearables exhibit no statistically or clinically significant bias based on skin pigmentation.
| S-EPMC11502980 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Homecare is healthcare based on the principle "outpatient before inpatient," with the aim of moving at least some care-delivery to the home. But reliable determination of vital signs at home requires new, smart sensors, which can be used by the patients themselves. We present a novel pulse oximetry sensor worn in the ear channel. It was previously shown that measurement of heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation and related respiratory information can be performed with reliable accuracy under laboratory conditions. The present study explores the clinical feasibility of the sensor system for cardiovascular monitoring during sleep, with the aim to diagnose sleep apnea. For this, human trials were performed in a sleep laboratory including patients with a clinical suspicion of sleep apnea. Besides a general analysis of the sensor's signal quality during sleep, the evaluation focuses on heart rate dynamics and time-variant oxygen saturation. In addition, several methods to derive respiration rate from photoplethysmographic signals are examined and discussed. Results from the in-ear sensor are compared with standard polysomnography monitoring and demonstrate that this novel system allows long-term nocturnal measurement of heart rate, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate with sufficient accuracy.
| S-EPMC4819232 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn low- and middle-income countries, health workers use pulse oximeters for intermittent spot measurements of oxygen saturation (SpO2). However, the accuracy and reliability of pulse oximeters for spot measurements have not been determined. We evaluated the repeatability of spot measurements and the ideal observation time to guide recommendations during spot check measurements.MethodsTwo 1-minute measurements were taken for the 3,903 subjects enrolled in the study conducted April 2020-January 2022 in Uganda, collecting 1 Hz SpO2 and signal quality index (SQI) data. The repeatability between the 2 measurements was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), calculated using a median of all seconds of non-zero SpO2 values for each recording (any quality, Q1) and again with a quality filter only using seconds with SQI 90% or higher (good quality, Q2). The ICC was also recalculated for both conditions of Q1 and Q2 using the initial 5 seconds, then the initial 10 seconds, and continuing with 5-second increments up to the full 60 seconds. Lastly, the whole minute ICC was calculated with good quality (Q2), including only records where both measurements had a mean SQI of more than 70% (Q3).ResultsThe repeatability ICC with condition Q1 was 0.591 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.570, 0.611). Using only the first 5 seconds of each measurement reduced the repeatability to 0.200 (95% CI=0.169, 0.230). Filtering with Q2, the whole-minute ICC was 0.855 (95% CI=0.847, 0.864). The ICC did not improve beyond the first 35 seconds. For Q3, the repeatability rose to 0.908 (95% CI=0.901, 0.914).ConclusionsTraining guidelines must emphasize the importance of signal quality and duration of measurement, targeting a minimum of 35 seconds of adequate-quality, stable data. In addition, the design of new devices should incorporate user prompts and force quality checks to encourage more accurate pulse oximetry measurements.
| S-EPMC10461707 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivesClinicians commonly use continuous pulse oximetry (CPOx) for hospitalized children with respiratory illnesses. The Choosing Wisely initiative recommended discontinuing CPOx for children on room air. We used quality improvement methods to reduce time on CPOx in patients with wheezing.MethodsOur project took place on 1 unit of a children's hospital. We developed consensus-based criteria for CPOx discontinuation. Interventions included education, a checklist used during nurse handoff, and discontinuation criteria incorporated into order sets. We collected data on a second unit where we did not actively intervene to assess for secular trends and negative consequences of shorter monitoring. We followed time until medically ready, ICU transfers, hospital revisits, and medical emergency team calls on both units. We tracked the impact of interventions by using run charts and statistical process control charts.ResultsMedian time per week on CPOx after meeting goals decreased from 10.7 hours to 3.1 hours on the intervention unit. Median time per week on CPOx on the control unit decreased from 11.5 hours to 6.9 hours. There was no decrease in time until medically ready on either unit. The percentage of patients needing transfer, revisit, or medical emergency team call was similar on both units.ConclusionsWith interventions focused on clarity and awareness of CPOx discontinuation criteria, we decreased time on CPOx; however, we saw no impact on time until medically ready. We expect that other centers could use analogous methods to standardize and reduce oxygen monitoring to meet Choosing Wisely recommendations.
| S-EPMC9923595 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNewborns with a critical congenital heart disease left undiagnosed and untreated have a substantial risk for serious complications and subsequent failure to thrive. Prenatal ultrasound screening is not widely available, nor is postnatal echocardiography. Physical examination is the standard for postnatal screening. Pulse oximetry has been proposed in numerous studies as an alternative screening method. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the diagnostic accuracies of both screening methods separately and combined.MethodsA systematic literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Global Health databases up to 30 November 2023 was conducted with the following keywords: critical congenital heart disease, physical examination, clinical scores, pulse oximetry, and echocardiography. The search included all studies conducted in the newborn period using both physical examination and pulse oximetry as screening methods and excluded newborns admitted to the intensive care unit. All studies were assessed for risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 score. The review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 statement guideline.ResultsOut of 2711 articles, 20 articles were selected as eligible for meta-analysis. Cumulatively, the sample included 872,549 screened newborns. The pooled sensitivity of the physical examination screening method was found to be 0.69 (0.66-0.73 (95% CI)) and specificity was found to be 0.98 (0.98-0.98). For the pulse oximetry screening method, the pooled sensitivity and specificity yielded 0.78 (0.75-0.82) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively. The combined method of screening yielded improved diagnostic characteristics at a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (0.91-0.95) and 0.98 (0.98-0.98, respectively.ConclusionsThe evidence indicates that combining both physical examination and pulse oximetry to screen for critical congenital heart disease exceeds the accuracy of either separate method. The main limitation is that solely newborns with suspected critical congenital heart disease were subjected to the reference standard. We recommend adapting both methods to screen for critical congenital heart diseases, especially in settings lacking standard fetal ultrasound screening. To increase the sensitivity further, we recommend increasing the screening time window and employing the peripheral perfusion index.
| S-EPMC10814555 | biostudies-literature