Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Concerns regarding potential risk of dermal irritation have led to the exclusion of NICU patients from the recommendation regarding the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wash for daily skin cleansing to reduce bloodstream infections. Our aim was to assess the safety of 2% CHG bathing in NICU patients.

Methods

The regulator required a stepwise study enrollment to three successive groups: term infants, followed by near-term and pre-term infants. For comparison, we used a cohort of matched controls. A propensity score-adjusted regression model was used to compare the groups.

Intervention

Infants were bathed thrice-weekly with 2% CHG-impregnated washcloths. Participant's skin was examined daily.

Results

Over a total of 661 days of treatment: 384,129, and 148 days for the term, near-term and pre-term groups, respectively, no skin reactions were observed. The intervention group was generally sicker, however, bloodstream infections were similar between the groups.

Conclusion

For infants >30 weeks and >3 days old, 2% CHG bathing was safe. Large multicenter studies are urgently needed to establish the effectiveness of this practice in the NICU.

SUBMITTER: Bar-Meir M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10035923 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study.

Bar-Meir Maskit M   Bendelac Shoshana S   Shchors Irina I  

PloS one 20230323 3


<h4>Background</h4>Concerns regarding potential risk of dermal irritation have led to the exclusion of NICU patients from the recommendation regarding the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wash for daily skin cleansing to reduce bloodstream infections. Our aim was to assess the safety of 2% CHG bathing in NICU patients.<h4>Methods</h4>The regulator required a stepwise study enrollment to three successive groups: term infants, followed by near-term and pre-term infants. For comparison, we u  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10859163 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA561526 | ENA
| S-EPMC11583449 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8599896 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2880780 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8191200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10881769 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2254655 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10539092 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7852922 | biostudies-literature