Editorial: Automatic methods for multiple sclerosis new lesions detection and segmentation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Commowick O
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10043498 | biostudies-literature | 2023
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Editorial: Automatic methods for multiple sclerosis new lesions detection and segmentation.
Commowick Olivier O Combès Benoît B Cervenansky Frédéric F Dojat Michel M
Frontiers in neuroscience 20230314
Similar Datasets
Project description:In recent years, many automatic brain structure segmentation methods have been proposed. However, these methods are commonly tested with non-lesioned brains and the effect of lesions on their performance has not been evaluated. Here, we analyze the effect of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on three well-known automatic brain structure segmentation methods, namely, FreeSurfer, FIRST and multi-atlas fused by majority voting, which use learning-based, deformable and atlas-based strategies, respectively. To perform a quantitative analysis, 100 synthetic images of MS patients with a total of 2174 lesions are simulated on two public databases with available brain structure ground truth information (IBSR18 and MICCAI'12). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) differences and the volume differences between the healthy and the simulated images are calculated for the subcortical structures and the brainstem. We observe that the three strategies are affected when lesions are present. However, the effects of the lesions do not follow the same pattern; the lesions either make the segmentation method underperform or surprisingly augment the segmentation accuracy. The obtained results show that FreeSurfer is the method most affected by the presence of lesions, with DSC differences (generated - healthy) ranging from - 0.11 ± 0.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87, whereas FIRST tends to be the most robust method when lesions are present (- 2.40 ± 5.54 to 0.44 ± 0.94). Lesion location is not important for global strategies such as FreeSurfer or majority voting, where structure segmentation is affected wherever the lesions exist. On the other hand, FIRST is more affected when the lesions are overlaid or close to the structure of analysis. The most affected structure by the presence of lesions is the nucleus accumbens (from - 1.12 ± 2.53 to 1.32 ± 4.00 for the left hemisphere and from - 2.40 ± 5.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87 for the right hemisphere), whereas the structures that show less variation include the thalamus (from 0.03 ± 0.35 to 0.74 ± 0.89 and from - 0.48 ± 1.08 to - 0.04 ± 0.22) and the brainstem (from - 0.20 ± 0.38 to 1.03 ± 1.31). The three segmentation approaches are affected by the presence of MS lesions, which demonstrates that there exists a problem in the automatic segmentation methods of the deep gray matter (DGM) structures that has to be taken into account when using them as a tool to measure the disease progression.
| S-EPMC5430150 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The location and extent of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important criteria for diagnosis, follow-up and prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical trials have shown that quantitative values, such as lesion volumes, are meaningful in MS prognosis. Manual lesion delineation for the segmentation of lesions is, however, time-consuming and suffers from observer variability. In this paper, we propose MSmetrix, an accurate and reliable automatic method for lesion segmentation based on MRI, independent of scanner or acquisition protocol and without requiring any training data. In MSmetrix, 3D T1-weighted and FLAIR MR images are used in a probabilistic model to detect white matter (WM) lesions as an outlier to normal brain while segmenting the brain tissue into grey matter, WM and cerebrospinal fluid. The actual lesion segmentation is performed based on prior knowledge about the location (within WM) and the appearance (hyperintense on FLAIR) of lesions. The accuracy of MSmetrix is evaluated by comparing its output with expert reference segmentations of 20 MRI datasets of MS patients. Spatial overlap (Dice) between the MSmetrix and the expert lesion segmentation is 0.67 ± 0.11. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) equals 0.8 indicating a good volumetric agreement between the MSmetrix and expert labelling. The reproducibility of MSmetrix' lesion volumes is evaluated based on 10 MS patients, scanned twice with a short interval on three different scanners. The agreement between the first and the second scan on each scanner is evaluated through the spatial overlap and absolute lesion volume difference between them. The spatial overlap was 0.69 ± 0.14 and absolute total lesion volume difference between the two scans was 0.54 ± 0.58 ml. Finally, the accuracy and reproducibility of MSmetrix compare favourably with other publicly available MS lesion segmentation algorithms, applied on the same data using default parameter settings.
| S-EPMC4474324 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gadolinium-enhancing lesions reflect active disease and are critical for in-patient monitoring in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this work, we have developed the first fully automated method to segment and count the gadolinium-enhancing lesions from routine clinical MRI of MS patients. The proposed method first segments the potential lesions using 2D-UNet from multi-channel scans (T1 post-contrast, T1 pre-contrast, FLAIR, T2, and proton-density) and classifies the lesions using a random forest classifier. The algorithm was trained and validated on 600 MRIs with manual segmentation. We compared the effect of loss functions (Dice, cross entropy, and bootstrapping cross entropy) and number of input contrasts. We compared the lesion counts with those by radiologists using 2,846 images. Dice, lesion-wise sensitivity, and false discovery rate with full 5 contrasts were 0.698, 0.844, and 0.307, which improved to 0.767, 0.969, and 0.00 in large lesions (>100 voxels). The model using bootstrapping loss function provided a statistically significant increase of 7.1% in sensitivity and of 2.3% in Dice compared with the model using cross entropy loss. T1 post/pre-contrast and FLAIR were the most important contrasts. For large lesions, the 2D-UNet model trained using T1 pre-contrast, FLAIR, T2, PD had a lesion-wise sensitivity of 0.688 and false discovery rate 0.083, even without T1 post-contrast. For counting lesions in 2846 routine MRI images, the model with 2D-UNet and random forest, which was trained with bootstrapping cross entropy, achieved accuracy of 87.7% using T1 pre-contrast, T1 post-contrast, and FLAIR when lesion counts were categorized as 0, 1, and 2 or more. The model performs well in routine non-standardized MRI datasets, allows large-scale analysis of clinical datasets, and may have clinical applications.
| S-EPMC8409666 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI data provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation eliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of large-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across multi-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability related to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. In particular, a precise delineation of lesions is hindered by a broad heterogeneity of lesion contrast, size, location, and shape. The goal of this study was to develop a fully-automatic framework - robust to variability in both image parameters and clinical condition - for segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data of MS and non-MS cases. Scans of 1042 subjects (459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies) were included in this multi-site study (n = 30). Data spanned three contrasts (T1-, T2-, and T2∗-weighted) for a total of 1943 vol and featured large heterogeneity in terms of resolution, orientation, coverage, and clinical conditions. The proposed cord and lesion automatic segmentation approach is based on a sequence of two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To deal with the very small proportion of spinal cord and/or lesion voxels compared to the rest of the volume, a first CNN with 2D dilated convolutions detects the spinal cord centerline, followed by a second CNN with 3D convolutions that segments the spinal cord and/or lesions. CNNs were trained independently with the Dice loss. When compared against manual segmentation, our CNN-based approach showed a median Dice of 95% vs. 88% for PropSeg (p ≤ 0.05), a state-of-the-art spinal cord segmentation method. Regarding lesion segmentation on MS data, our framework provided a Dice of 60%, a relative volume difference of -15%, and a lesion-wise detection sensitivity and precision of 83% and 77%, respectively. In this study, we introduce a robust method to segment the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions on a variety of MRI contrasts. The proposed framework is open-source and readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.
| S-EPMC6759925 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Accurate segmentation of MS lesions on MRI is difficult and, if performed manually, time consuming. Automatic segmentations rely strongly on the image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Literature examining segmentation tool performances in real-world multi-site data acquisition settings is scarce. OBJECTIVE:FLAIR2, a combination of T2-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, improves tissue contrast while suppressing CSF. We compared the use of FLAIR and FLAIR2 in LesionTOADS, OASIS and the lesion segmentation toolbox (LST) when applied to non-homogenized, multi-center 2D-imaging data. METHODS:Lesions were segmented on 47 MS patient data sets obtained from 34 sites using LesionTOADS, OASIS and LST, and compared to a semi-automatically generated reference. The performance of FLAIR and FLAIR2 was assessed using the relative lesion volume difference (LVD), Dice coefficient (DSC), sensitivity (SEN) and symmetric surface distance (SSD). Performance improvements related to lesion volumes (LVs) were evaluated for all tools. For comparison, LesionTOADS was also used to segment lesions from 3 T single-center MR data of 40 clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients. RESULTS:Compared to FLAIR, the use of FLAIR2 in LesionTOADS led to improvements of 31.6% (LVD), 14.0% (DSC), 25.1% (SEN), and 47.0% (SSD) in the multi-center study. DSC and SSD significantly improved for larger LVs, while LVD and SEN were enhanced independent of LV. OASIS showed little difference between FLAIR and FLAIR2, likely due to its inherent use of T2w and FLAIR. LST replicated the benefits of FLAIR2 only in part, indicating that further optimization, particularly at low LVs is needed. In the CIS study, LesionTOADS did not benefit from the use of FLAIR2 as the segmentation performance for both FLAIR and FLAIR2 was heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world, multi-center experiment, FLAIR2 outperformed FLAIR in its ability to segment MS lesions with LesionTOADS. The computation of FLAIR2 enhanced lesion detection, at minimally increased computational time or cost, even retrospectively. Further work is needed to determine how LesionTOADS and other tools, such as LST, can optimally benefit from the improved FLAIR2 contrast.
| S-EPMC6646743 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the performance of deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in segmenting gadolinium-enhancing lesions using a large cohort of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.MethodsA three-dimensional (3D) CNN model was trained for segmentation of gadolinium-enhancing lesions using multispectral magnetic resonance imaging data (MRI) from 1006 relapsing-remitting MS patients. The network performance was evaluated for three combinations of multispectral MRI used as input: (U5) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, and pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted images; (U2) pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted images; and (U1) only post-contrast T1-weighted images. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and lesion-wise true-positive (TPR) and false-positive (FPR) rates. Performance was also evaluated as a function of enhancing lesion volume.ResultsThe DSC/TPR/FPR values averaged over all the enhancing lesion sizes were 0.77/0.90/0.23 using the U5 model. These values for the largest enhancement volumes (>500 mm3) were 0.81/0.97/0.04. For U2, the average DSC/TPR/FPR values were 0.72/0.86/0.31. Comparable performance was observed with U1. For all types of input, the network performance degraded with decreased enhancement size.ConclusionExcellent segmentation of enhancing lesions was observed for enhancement volume ⩾70 mm3. The best performance was achieved when the input included all five multispectral image sets.
| S-EPMC7680286 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intensity-based multi-atlas segmentation strategies have shown to be particularly successful in segmenting brain images of healthy subjects. However, in the same way as most of the methods in the state of the art, their performance tends to be affected by the presence of MRI visible lesions, such as those found in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Here, we present an approach to minimize the effect of the abnormal lesion intensities on multi-atlas segmentation. We propose a new voxel/patch correspondence model for intensity-based multi-atlas label fusion strategies that leads to more accurate similarity measures, having a key role in the final brain segmentation. We present the theory of this model and integrate it into two well-known fusion strategies: Non-local Spatial STAPLE (NLSS) and Joint Label Fusion (JLF). The experiments performed show that our proposal improves the segmentation performance of the lesion areas. The results indicate a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) improvement of 1.96% for NLSS (3.29% inside and 0.79% around the lesion masks) and, an improvement of 2.06% for JLF (2.31% inside and 1.42% around lesions). Furthermore, we show that, with the proposed strategy, the well-established preprocessing step of lesion filling can be disregarded, obtaining similar or even more accurate segmentation results.
| S-EPMC6396016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The quantification of new or enlarged lesions from follow-up MRI scans is an important surrogate of clinical disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Not only is manual segmentation time consuming, but inter-rater variability is high. Currently, only a few fully automated methods are available. We address this gap in the field by employing a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) with encoder-decoder architecture for fully automatic longitudinal lesion segmentation. Input data consist of two fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (baseline and follow-up) per patient. Each image is entered into the encoder and the feature maps are concatenated and then fed into the decoder. The output is a 3D mask indicating new or enlarged lesions (compared to the baseline scan). The proposed method was trained on 1809 single point and 1444 longitudinal patient data sets and then validated on 185 independent longitudinal data sets from two different scanners. From the two validation data sets, manual segmentations were available from three experienced raters, respectively. The performance of the proposed method was compared to the open source Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST), which is a current state-of-art longitudinal lesion segmentation method. The mean lesion-wise inter-rater sensitivity was 62%, while the mean inter-rater number of false positive (FP) findings was 0.41 lesions per case. The two validated algorithms showed a mean sensitivity of 60% (CNN), 46% (LST) and a mean FP of 0.48 (CNN), 1.86 (LST) per case. Sensitivity and number of FP were not significantly different (p < 0.05) between the CNN and manual raters. New or enlarged lesions counted by the CNN algorithm appeared to be comparable with manual expert ratings. The proposed algorithm seems to outperform currently available approaches, particularly LST. The high inter-rater variability in case of manual segmentation indicates the complexity of identifying new or enlarged lesions. An automated CNN-based approach can quickly provide an independent and deterministic assessment of new or enlarged lesions from baseline to follow-up scans with acceptable reliability.
| S-EPMC7554211 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Total brain white matter lesion (WML) volume is the most widely established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measure in studies of multiple sclerosis (MS). To estimate WML volume, there are a number of automatic segmentation methods available, yet manual delineation remains the gold standard approach. Automatic approaches often yield a probability map to which a threshold is applied to create lesion segmentation masks. Unfortunately, few approaches systematically determine the threshold employed; many methods use a manually selected threshold, thus introducing human error and bias into the automated procedure. In this study, we propose and validate an automatic thresholding algorithm, Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis (TAPAS), to obtain subject-specific threshold estimates for probability map automatic segmentation of T2-weighted (T2) hyperintense WMLs. Using multimodal MRI, the proposed method applies an automatic segmentation algorithm to obtain probability maps. We obtain the true subject-specific threshold that maximizes the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Then the subject-specific thresholds are modeled on a naive estimate of volume using a generalized additive model. Applying this model, we predict a subject-specific threshold in data not used for training. We ran a Monte Carlo-resampled split-sample cross-validation (100 validation sets) using two data sets: the first obtained from the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) on a Philips 3 Tesla (3T) scanner (n = 94) and a second collected at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) using a Siemens 3T scanner (n = 40). By means of the proposed automated technique, in the JHH data we found an average reduction in subject-level absolute error of 0.1 mL per one mL increase in manual volume. Using Bland-Altman analysis, we found that volumetric bias associated with group-level thresholding was mitigated when applying TAPAS. The BWH data showed similar absolute error estimates using group-level thresholding or TAPAS likely since Bland-Altman analyses indicated no systematic biases associated with group or TAPAS volume estimates. The current study presents the first validated fully automated method for subject-specific threshold prediction to segment brain lesions.
| S-EPMC7236059 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Different types of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) can be observed through MRI in the brain and spinal cord, especially Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions for patients suffering from MS and age-related WMH for subjects with cognitive disorders and/or elderly people. To better diagnose and monitor the disease progression, the quantitative evaluation of WMH load has proven to be useful for clinical routine and trials. Since manual delineation for WMH segmentation is highly time-consuming and suffers from intra and inter observer variability, several methods have been proposed to automatically segment either MS lesions or age-related WMH, but none is validated on both WMH types. Here, we aim at proposing the White matter Hyperintensities Automatic Segmentation Algorithm adapted to 3D T2-FLAIR datasets (WHASA-3D), a fast and robust automatic segmentation tool designed to be implemented in clinical practice for the detection of both MS lesions and age-related WMH in the brain, using both 3D T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images. In order to increase its robustness for MS lesions, WHASA-3D expands the original WHASA method, which relies on the coupling of non-linear diffusion framework and watershed parcellation, where regions considered as WMH are selected based on intensity and location characteristics, and finally refined with geodesic dilation. The previous validation was performed on 2D T2-FLAIR and subjects with cognitive disorders and elderly subjects. 60 subjects from a heterogeneous database of dementia patients, multiple sclerosis patients and elderly subjects with multiple MRI scanners and a wide range of lesion loads were used to evaluate WHASA and WHASA-3D through volume and spatial agreement in comparison with consensus reference segmentations. In addition, a direct comparison on the MS database with six available supervised and unsupervised state-of-the-art WMH segmentation methods (LST-LGA and LPA, Lesion-TOADS, lesionBrain, BIANCA and nicMSlesions) with default and optimised settings (when feasible) was conducted. WHASA-3D confirmed an improved performance with respect to WHASA, achieving a better spatial overlap (Dice) (0.67 vs 0.63), a reduced absolute volume error (AVE) (3.11 vs 6.2 mL) and an increased volume agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) (0.96 vs 0.78). Compared to available state-of-the-art algorithms on the MS database, WHASA-3D outperformed both unsupervised and supervised methods when used with their default settings, showing the highest volume agreement (ICC = 0.95) as well as the highest average Dice (0.58). Optimising and/or retraining LST-LGA, BIANCA and nicMSlesions, using a subset of the MS database as training set, resulted in improved performances on the remaining testing set (average Dice: LST-LGA default/optimized = 0.41/0.51, BIANCA default/optimized = 0.22/0.39, nicMSlesions default/optimized = 0.17/0.63, WHASA-3D = 0.58). Evaluation and comparison results suggest that WHASA-3D is a reliable and easy-to-use method for the automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities, for both MS lesions and age-related WMH. Further validation on larger datasets would be useful to confirm these first findings.
| S-EPMC8896108 | biostudies-literature