Prognostic Value of Absolute Lymphocyte Count in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ueda K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10053370 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Prognostic Value of Absolute Lymphocyte Count in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab.
Ueda Kosuke K Ogasawara Naoyuki N Ito Naoki N Ohnishi Satoshi S Suekane Hiroki H Kurose Hirofumi H Hiroshige Tasuku T Chikui Katsuaki K Uemura Keiichiro K Nishihara Kiyoaki K Nakiri Makoto M Suekane Shigetaka S Igawa Tsukasa T
Journal of clinical medicine 20230321 6
Nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) is standard therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is a valuable prognostic factor in patients with various cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we determined the prognostic value of pretreatment ALC in advanced RCC patients treated with NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy. Data from 46 advanced RCC patients treated with NIVO + IPI between September 2018 and August 2022 were retrospec ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundNivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma.MethodsWe randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk.ResultsA total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follow-up of 25.2 months in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, the 18-month overall survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 78) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with sunitinib; the median overall survival was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 26.0 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 42% versus 27% (P<0.001), and the complete response rate was 9% versus 1%. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.82; P=0.03, not significant per the prespecified 0.009 threshold). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 509 of 547 patients (93%) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 521 of 535 patients (97%) in the sunitinib group; grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 250 patients (46%) and 335 patients (63%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% and 12% of the patients in the respective groups.ConclusionsOverall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate- and poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 214 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02231749 .).
| S-EPMC5972549 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn patients with melanoma, ipilimumab (an antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4]) prolongs overall survival, and nivolumab (an antibody against the programmed death 1 [PD-1] receptor) produced durable tumor regression in a phase 1 trial. On the basis of their distinct immunologic mechanisms of action and supportive preclinical data, we conducted a phase 1 trial of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma.MethodsWe administered intravenous doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab alone every 3 weeks for 4 doses (concurrent regimen). The combined treatment was subsequently administered every 12 weeks for up to 8 doses. In a sequenced regimen, patients previously treated with ipilimumab received nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 48 doses.ResultsA total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%.ConclusionsConcurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.).
| S-EPMC5698004 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy has become the standard of treatment for recurrent metastatic esophageal cancer (EC), and the value of efficacy predictive markers represented by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is limited. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prognostic value of peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at baseline in patients with recurrent metastatic EC treated with immunotherapy, and to further investigate the relationship between the minimal ALC value (Min ALC) and radiotherapy (RT) parameters.MethodsThe main inclusion criteria were: histologically or imaging confirmed recurrent or metastatic EC; complete routine blood test data. A total of 105 patients were included in a single-center institution, 65 of whom had previously received RT. The optimal cut-off value for baseline lymphopenia was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The prognostic value of baseline phase lymphopenia for immunotherapy were determined by cox regression analysis and the associated factors affecting lymphopenia were explored by logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe cut-off value for baseline ALC predicting 1-year overall survival (OS) was 625 cells/µL. The OS was significantly lower in the lymphopenia group (ALC ≤625 cells/µL) than in the non-lymphopenia group (ALC >625 cells/µL) (median OS: 6 vs. 12 months, P=0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-immunotherapy lymphopenia was an important factor influencing patient prognosis [hazard ratio (HR): 1.771, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.051-2.985; P=0.032)] (adjusted for clinical factors including sex, age, tumor location, histology, degree of differentiation, distant metastasis, use of RT). Patients with a previous grade 4 (G4) Min ALC during RT were more likely to develop pre-immunotherapy lymphopenia following diagnosis of recurrent metastasis [odds ratio (OR): 10.809, 95% CI: 2.185-53.471; P=0.004]. Planning target volume (PTV) volume greater than 521.2 cm3 (OR: 19.981, 95% CI: 1.372-290.985; P=0.028) was an independent risk factor affecting the G4 Min ALC during RT.ConclusionsLymphopenia is associated with a poorer immunotherapy prognosis in patients with recurrent metastatic EC and those with previous G4 Min ALC after RT. RT-related parameters, especially irradiation volume, can significantly affect lymphocyte counts.
| S-EPMC9358517 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of treatment with cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are unknown.MethodsIn this phase 3, double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had not previously received treatment and had intermediate or poor prognostic risk according to the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium categories. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of cabozantinib daily in addition to nivolumab and ipilimumab (experimental group) or matched placebo in addition to nivolumab and ipilimumab (control group). Nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) and ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) were administered once every 3 weeks for four cycles. Patients then received nivolumab maintenance therapy (480 mg once every 4 weeks) for up to 2 years. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and was assessed in the first 550 patients who had undergone randomization. The secondary end point was overall survival, assessed in all patients who had undergone randomization.ResultsOverall, 855 patients underwent randomization: 428 were assigned to the experimental group and 427 to the control group. Among the first 550 patients who had undergone randomization (276 in the experimental group and 274 in the control group), the probability of progression-free survival at 12 months was 0.57 in the experimental group and 0.49 in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.94; P = 0.01); 43% of the patients in the experimental group and 36% in the control group had a response. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 79% of the patients in the experimental group and in 56% in the control group. Follow-up for overall survival is ongoing.ConclusionsAmong patients with previously untreated, advanced renal-cell carcinoma who had intermediate or poor prognostic risk, treatment with cabozantinib plus nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the experimental group than in the control group. (Funded by Exelixis; COSMIC-313 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03937219.).
| S-EPMC10257898 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNivolumab plus ipilimumab improves overall survival and is associated with less toxicity compared with sunitinib in the first-line setting of advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The current study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced RCC from the payer perspectives high- and middle-income regions.MethodsA decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the health and economic outcomes of first-line sunitinib and nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment associated with advanced RCC. The clinical and utility data were obtained from published reports. The cost data were acquired for the payer perspectives of the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the uncertainties of the results. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used.ResultsNivolumab plus ipilimumab gained 0.70-0.76 QALYs compared with sunitinib. Our analysis determined the following ICERs for nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib in first-line advanced RCC treatment: US $ 85,506 /QALY; UK $ 126,499/QALY; and China $ 4682/QALY. Sensitivity analyses found the model outputs to be most affected for body weight and for the prices of nivolumab, sunitinib and ipilimumab.ConclusionsNivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment could gain more health benefits for advanced RCC in comparison with standard sunitinib, which is considered to be cost-effective in the US and China but not in the UK.
| S-EPMC6247499 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeIn the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes.Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated.ResultsMedian OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF-mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF-wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed.ConclusionThese 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.
| S-EPMC8718224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy that mainly afflicts young individuals of African descent and has few treatment options. Despite the approval of combination immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) for other kidney cancers, its efficacy against RMC remains elusive. We conducted a prospective clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with RMC. Enrollment was halted for futility after a prespecified interim analysis revealed that all 10 patients experienced rapid disease progression with 5/10 meeting radiological criteria for hyperprogression. Median progression-free survival was only 1.38 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28, 1.60). To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we analyzed high-quality single-cell RNA sequencing data from RMC patients before and after nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment. Our analysis suggested that ICT-triggered interferon gamma upregulation induces RMC tumor cells to activate key myeloid regulators such as the CEBPB / p300 complex that promote tumor cell proliferation leading to hyperprogression. Using an immunocompetent somatic mosaic genetically engineered mouse model of RMC, we confirmed that combination ICT induced hyperprogression of primary and metastatic tumors compared with IgG control by hijacking myeloid-affiliated transcriptional circuits. Blocking of this “myeloid mimicry” adaptive mechanism using a selective inhibitor of p300 induced sensitivity to combination ICT in our animal model of RMC. These findings provide novel insights into RMC adaptation to ICT and demonstrate that inhibiting master myeloid regulators can elicit antitumor responses to ICT thus informing the next generation of immunotherapy strategies targeting hyperprogression.
2025-06-30 | GSE256326 | GEO
Project description:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab and ipilimumab (N/I) are important treatment options for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The tumor microenvironment (TME) in these ICI-treated patients is largely unknown. Twenty-four patients treated with N/I between July 2015 and June 2020 were analyzed. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was conducted to define the TME, including various T cell subsets, B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells. The median age of the study patients was 61 years (range, 39-80) and 75.0% of these cases were men. The objective response rate with N/I was 50.0%. The densities of the CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (P=0.005), specifically CD137+ CD8+ T cells (P=0.017), Foxp3- CD4+ helper T cells (P=0.003), Foxp3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells (P=0.045), CD68+ CD206- M1 macrophages (P=0.008), and CD68+ CD206+ M2 macrophages (P=0.021) were significantly higher in the treatment responders. At a median follow-up duration of 24.7 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.6 months. The high densities (≥median) of Foxp3- CD4+ helper T cells (P=0.016) and CD68+ CD206- M1 macrophages (P=0.008) were significantly associated with better PFS, and the density of CD137+ CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (P=0.079) was marginally associated with better PFS. After multivariate analysis, the higher density of Foxp3- CD4+ helper T cells was independently associated with better PFS (hazard ratio 0.19; P=0.016). The properties and clinical implications of the TME properties in RCC indicate that Foxp3- CD4+ helper T cells, M1 macrophages, and CD137+ CD8+ T cells are potential predictive biomarkers and treatment targets.
| S-EPMC9552830 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe Fast Real-time Assessment of Combination Therapies in Immuno-ONcology study in patients with aRCC (FRACTION-RCC) was designed to assess new immuno-oncology (IO) combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We present results in IO-naive patients treated with nivolumab (NIVO) + relatlimab (RELA) or NIVO + ipilimumab (IPI) in track 1.MethodsThe open-label, randomised, phase II FRACTION-RCC trial enrolled patients with aRCC from 32 hospitals and cancer centres across six countries. Patients were enrolled in track 1 (IO-naive) or track 2 (IO-experienced). IO-naive patients were stratified by previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and randomised to NIVO (240 mg) + RELA (80 mg) intravenously once every 2 weeks or NIVO (3 mg/kg) + IPI (1 mg/kg) intravenously once every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by NIVO (480 mg) once every 4 weeks, each up to ∼2 years. The primary endpoints were objective response by investigator (RECIST version 1.1), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks. Safety was a secondary endpoint; biomarker analyses were exploratory.ResultsFRACTION-RCC enrolled patients between 2 February 2017 and 23 January 2020. In track 1, 30 patients each were treated with NIVO + RELA or NIVO + IPI (clinical database lock, 1 November 2021). With NIVO + RELA [median follow-up, 48.6 months; interquartile range (IQR) 46.9-51.7 months], objective response was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 49%], with 33 weeks (95% CI 16-53 weeks) median DOR. The PFS rate at 24 weeks was 43% (95% CI 25% to 60%). With NIVO + IPI (median follow-up, 48.7 months; IQR 47.1-52.0 months), the objective response was 20% (95% CI 8% to 39%), with the median DOR not reached (95% CI 33 weeks-not estimable). The PFS rate at 24 weeks was 49% (95% CI 29% to 66%). Higher baseline lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels were detected among track 1 NIVO + RELA responders. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 4/30 (13%) patients treated with NIVO + RELA and 10/30 (33%) patients treated with NIVO + IPI. No deaths were attributed to study treatments.ConclusionsResults showed antitumour activity and manageable safety with NIVO + RELA. Findings also support NIVO + IPI as an effective combination regimen in IO-naive patients with aRCC.
| S-EPMC11667034 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn the ongoing phase 3, CheckMate 214 trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab improved overall survival compared with sunitinib in patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to assess whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be used to further describe the benefit-risk profile of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib.MethodsIn the phase 3, randomised, controlled, CheckMate 214 trial, patients aged 18 years and older with previously untreated, advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a clear-cell component were recruited from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 28 countries. Patients were categorised by risk status into favourable, intermediate, and poor risk subgroups and randomly assigned (1:1) to open-label nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle. Randomisation was done with a block size of four and stratified by risk status and geographical region. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), and EuroQol five dimensional three level (EQ-5D-3L) instruments. The coprimary endpoints of the trial, reported previously, were overall survival, progression-free survival, and the proportion of patients who had an objective response in those categorised as at intermediate or poor risk. PROs in all randomised participants were assessed as an exploratory endpoint; here we report this exploratory endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02231749, and is ongoing but is now closed to recruitment.FindingsBetween Oct 16, 2014, and Feb 23, 2016, of 1390 patients screened, 1096 (79%) were randomly assigned to treatment, of whom 847 (77%) were at intermediate or poor risk and randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=425) or sunitinib (n=422). Median follow-up was 25·2 months (IQR 23·0-27·4). PROs were more favourable with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than sunitinib throughout the first 103 weeks after baseline, with mean change from baseline at week 103 for FKSI-19 total score being 4·00 (95% CI 1·91 to 6·09) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus -3·14 (-6·03 to -0·25) for sunitinib (p<0·0001), and for FACT-G total score being 4·77 (1·73 to 7·82) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus -4·32 (-8·54 to -0·11) for sunitinib (p=0·0005). Significant differences were also seen for four of five FKSI-19 domains (disease-related symptoms, physical disease-related symptoms, treatment side-effects, and functional wellbeing) and FACT-G physical and functional wellbeing domains. However, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups at week 103 in EQ-5D-3L visual analogue rating scale (VAS) scores, with mean change from baseline to week 103 of 10·07 (95% CI 4·35 to 15·80) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 6·40 (-1·36 to 14·16) for sunitinib (p=0·45). Compared with sunitinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab reduced risk of deterioration in FKSI-19 total score (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54; 95% CI 0·46-0·63), FACT-G total score (0·63, 0·52-0·75), and EQ-5D-3L VAS score (HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·63-0·89) and UK utility scores (0·67, 0·57-0·80).InterpretationNivolumab plus ipilimumab leads to fewer symptoms and better HRQoL than sunitinib in patients at intermediate or poor risk with advanced renal cell carcinoma. These results suggest that the superior efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib comes with the additional benefit of improved HRQoL.FundingBristol-Myers Squibb and ONO Pharmaceutical.
| S-EPMC6701190 | biostudies-literature