Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications.

Methods and results

This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4-5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used

SUBMITTER: Boveda S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10062361 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature