Dataset Information

Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Compliance is crucial for the treatment outcome with removable appliances. Previous studies on treatment with the Twin Block appliance have focused on effectiveness in relation to other treatment methods or wear-time. Studies on different check-up intervals to improve compliance seem to be lacking.

Objectives

To compare the impact of two different check-up prescriptions on patient compliance and treatment outcome during treatment with Twin Block.

Trial design

Two-arm parallel group, single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

Materials and methods

Seventy-three patients, 38 boys, and 35 girls, mean age 11.2 years, were included and block-randomized into two groups treated with a Twin Block appliance. Group 1 was called for check-up visit every sixth week and group 2 every fourth week. Compliance was evaluated with a TheraMon® microsensor, moulded into the appliance, measuring wear-time. Overjet, overbite, and molar relationships were assessed on study casts before and after treatment. The treatment outcomes were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

In group 1, the reduction of overjet was 5.2 mm and the mean wear-time was 6.9 hours. In group 2, the reduction was 4.7 mm and the wear-time was 6.1 hours. Seventy-four per cent of the patients presented an overjet of 4 mm or less. Wear-time did not correlate to age, gender, or severity of malocclusion.

Harms

No harm was observed in any patient. Lateral open bites were registered during treatment but were normalized at the end of the treatment.

Limitations

The trial was a single-centre study and long-term effects were not evaluated.

Conclusions

During treatment with the Twin Block appliance, a 4-week check-up interval did not improve treatment outcome or increase wear-time, compared to a 6-week check-up interval. The mean wear-time was 6.5 hours per day, even if the recommendation was 12 hours.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05155774.

SUBMITTER: Frilund E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10065135 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.

Frilund Erik E Sonesson Mikael M Sonesson Mikael M Magnusson Anders A

European journal of orthodontics 20230301 2

<h4>Background</h4>Compliance is crucial for the treatment outcome with removable appliances. Previous studies on treatment with the Twin Block appliance have focused on effectiveness in relation to other treatment methods or wear-time. Studies on different check-up intervals to improve compliance seem to be lacking.<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the impact of two different check-up prescriptions on patient compliance and treatment outcome during treatment with Twin Block.<h4>Trial design</h4>Two ...[more]

PMID: 35968672

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOur meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of applying Herbst and Twin Block appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children.MethodsDatabases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China VIP Database (VIP), and Wanfang were thoroughly searched from inception to August 9, 2023. The outcomes included skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as the effect indicator, and the effect size was expressed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The heterogeneity of each outcome effect size was tested, and the heterogeneity statistic I2 ≥ 50% was analyzed by the random-effect model, otherwise, the fixed-effect model was conducted. Sensitivity analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 12 studies involving 574 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Herbst appliance had a statistically significant increase in mandibular body length (WMD: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.96, P < 0.001) compared with the Twin Block appliance. More increases in angle and distance of L1 to mandibular plane (MP) were found in the Herbst appliance compared with the Twin Block appliance. Significant and greater improvements in molar relationship (WMD: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.29, P = 0.002), posterior facial height (WMD: -1.23, 95% CI: -2.08 to -0.38, P = 0.005), convexity angle (WMD: -1.89, 95% CI: -3.12 to -0.66, P = 0.003), and Sella-Nasion plane angle (U1 to SN) (WMD: 3.34, 95% CI: 2.25 to 4.43, P < 0.001) were achieved in the Twin Block appliance. Herbst and Twin Block appliances produced similar effects in the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes including Sella-Nasion-point A (SNA), Sella-Nasion-point B, point A-Nasion-point B (ANB), overjet, and overbite.ConclusionAs the findings revealed both Herbst and Twin Block appliances contributed successfully to the correction of Class II malocclusion. Compared with the Twin Block appliance, the Herbst appliance may have more advantages in mandibular bone movement. Twin Block therapy resulted in more improvement in the aesthetics of the face.

Project description:Objective This study aimed to compare dentoskeletal changes in skeletal class-II malocclusion with removable twin block appliance and fixed AdvanSync2 appliance.Materials and methods A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted over a span of 1 year at AFID at Rawalpindi. Thirty patients with skeletal class-II malocclusion, 16 males (53.3%) and 14 females (46.6%), were randomly selected and divided in two equal groups (15 each) to be treated with either fixed functional appliances (FFAs) or with removable functional appliances (RFAs). Out of 30 patients, 15 between cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) stages of 2 and 3 were treated with RFA (twin block appliances) and remaining 15 between CVM stages of 4 and 5 were treated with FFA (AdvanSync2 appliances). Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2), angular variable, and linear variable were measured to compare the dentoskeletal effects between the two groups.Statitical analysis Paired sample t-test was used to assess significant difference between variables at T1 (Pre-treatment) and T2 (Post-treatment) stage for both RFA and FFA group. Comparison among the RFA and FFA group was made using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U Test. IBM SPSS version 25.0 was used for evaluation.Results No significant difference was found in angular variables between the RFA and FFA groups (p > 0.05) with the exception of linear variables. Sella-posterior nasal spine (S-PNS) length significantly increased and Jarabak's ratio significantly decreased for FFA group (p = 0.010 and 0.045, respectively), when compared with RFA group.Conclusion Both the appliances, twin block (RFA) and AdvanSync2 (FFA), are effective for correction of skeletal class-II malocclusion. Both the appliances produced similar effects in the sagittal plane but for better vertical control twin block should be the appliance of choice. AdvanSync2 appliance could be preferred over twin block appliance when dentoalveolar and slight retrusive effect on the maxilla is desired especially for individuals in postpubertal growth spurt.

Project description:Background Different techniques have been used to reduce functional treatment time including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and the majority of studies have been conducted on animals. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of LLLT on improving orthodontic functional treatment using the Twin-Block (TB) appliance. Materials and methods This study was a three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Patients were selected using the following inclusion criteria: skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulting from mandibular retrognathia (angle between the anterior cranial base and the NB plane (i.e., SNB angle): 73°-78°), the sagittal skeletal discrepancy angle (ANB angle) between 4° and 9°, and overjet between 5 and 9 mm. Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups. In the LLLT-TB group, the low-level laser device was used with a wavelength of 808 nm and power of 250 mW in addition to functional treatment with a Twin-Block appliance. The laser was applied on the skin at the bilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions, at five points, each point received 5 J of the laser for 20 seconds. The laser course was twice a week in the first month, every two weeks in the second month, and every three weeks up to the end of the treatment. The second group (the TB group) received functional treatment with a Twin-Block appliance, while patients in the third group (the untreated control group (UCG)) were observed for nine months without any intervention. Results There were statistically significant differences in treatment periods between the LLLT-TB group and the TB group (129 days and 235 days, respectively, P-value<0.001). The change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) was the highest in the LLLT-TB group compared with the TB and the UCG groups (4.41 mm, 3.66 mm, and 1.07 mm, respectively; P-value<0.001). Conclusions The application of low-level laser therapy on the condylar regions accelerated the functional treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion patients by approximately 45% and increased the bone growth and mandibular length. The improvement in the SNB angle was similar in both interventional groups. Irradiation of low-level laser stimulated bone growth at the condyles and did not cause anterior movement of the temporomandibular joint following functional orthopedic correction.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare the effects on vertical dentoskeletal dimension produced by Pendulum appliance and Clear Aligners in patients with Class II malocclusion.Trial designThis is a prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.MethodsThe Pendulum Group (PG) consisted of 20 patients (15F, 5 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 4.3 years. The Clear Aligners Group (CAG) comprised 20 patients (13F, 7 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.2 years. Distalization's protocol in PG involved the activation of TMA wires till the achievement of Class I molar relationship. A protocol of sequential distalization was applied in the CAG. For each subject lateral cephalograms have been analyzed before treatment (T1) and at the end of the therapy (T2). Descriptive statistics and statistical between-group comparisons (PG vs CAG) were calculated for the craniofacial starting forms at T1 and for the T2-T1 changes. Statistical between-group comparisons for the T2-T1 changes were performed with independent samples t-tests (P < 0.05).ResultsThe PG showed significantly greater increases in SN^GoGn° when compared with CAG (+ 2.1 and - 0.3 degrees, respectively). Clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane with significantly greater increase of SN^POccl angle was observed in PG (+ 2.8 degrees) when compared with CAG (- 4.2 degrees). The PG revealed a significant increase in the N-Me variable with a mean change of + 4.4 mm compared to the CAG with mean values of - 1.2 mm. The PG showed an increase in the ArGo^GoMe angle (+ 0.7° degrees) compared to the CAG (- 3.4° degrees). The PG showed significantly greater increases in both maxillary and mandibular first molar to palatal plane (+ 1.3 and + 2.1 mm, respectively) when compared with CAG (- 0.9 and - 0.2 mm, respectively).ConclusionsUpper molar distalization with clear aligners represents a valid alternative to non-extraction treatment of Class II malocclusion, reducing the extrusion of maxillary first molars and improving the management of the occlusal plane and vertical dimension.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05298280. Registered 28 March 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov .

Dataset Information

Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.

Background

Objectives

Trial design

Materials and methods

Results

Harms

Limitations

Conclusions

Clinical trial registration

Publications

Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets