Dataset Information

Systematic comparison of tools used for m⁶A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

ABSTRACT: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been increasingly recognized as a new and important regulator of gene expression. To date, transcriptome-wide m6A detection primarily relies on well-established methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. However, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform has recently emerged as a promising alternative method to study m6A. While multiple computational tools are being developed to facilitate the direct detection of nucleotide modifications, little is known about the capabilities and limitations of these tools. Here, we systematically compare ten tools used for mapping m6A from ONT DRS data. We find that most tools present a trade-off between precision and recall, and integrating results from multiple tools greatly improve performance. Using a negative control could improve precision by subtracting certain intrinsic bias. We also observed variation in detection capabilities and quantitative information among motifs, and identified sequencing depth and m6A stoichiometry as potential factors affecting performance. Our study provides insight into the computational tools currently used for mapping m6A based on ONT DRS data and highlights the potential for further improving these tools, which may serve as the basis for future research.

SUBMITTER: Zhong ZD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10076423 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systematic comparison of tools used for m<sup>6</sup>A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Zhong Zhen-Dong ZD Xie Ying-Yuan YY Chen Hong-Xuan HX Lan Ye-Lin YL Liu Xue-Hong XH Ji Jing-Yun JY Wu Fu F Jin Lingmei L Chen Jiekai J Mak Daniel W DW Zhang Zhang Z Luo Guan-Zheng GZ

Nature communications 20230405 1

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been increasingly recognized as a new and important regulator of gene expression. To date, transcriptome-wide m6A detection primarily relies on well-established methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. However, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform has recently emerged as a promising alternative method to study m6A. While multiple computational tools are being developed to facilitate the direct detection of ...[more]

PMID: 37019930

Similar Datasets

Project description:Modifications on viral RNAs (vRNAs), either genomic RNAs or RNA transcripts, have complex effects on the viral life cycle and cellular responses to viral infection. The advent of Oxford Nanopore Technologies Direct RNA Sequencing provides a new strategy for studying RNA modifications. To this end, multiple computational tools have been developed, but a systemic evaluation of their performance in mapping vRNA modifications is lacking. Here, 10 computational tools were tested using the Sindbis virus (SINV) RNAs isolated from infected mammalian (BHK-21) or mosquito (C6/36) cells, with in vitro-transcribed RNAs serving as modification-free control. Three single-mode approaches were shown to be inapplicable in the viral context, and three out of seven comparative methods required cutoff adjustments to reduce false-positive predictions. Utilizing optimized cutoffs, an integrated analysis of comparative tools suggested that the intersected predictions of Tombo_com and xPore were significantly enriched compared with the background. Consequently, a pipeline integrating Tombo_com and xPore was proposed for vRNA modification detection; the performance of which was supported by N6-methyladenosine prediction in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNAs using publicly available data. When applied to SINV RNAs, this pipeline revealed more intensive modifications in subgenomic RNAs than in genomic RNAs. Modified uridines were frequently identified, exhibiting substantive overlapping between vRNAs generated in different cell lines. On the other hand, the interpretation of other modifications remained unclear, underlining the limitations of the current computational tools despite their notable potential.IMPORTANCEComputational approaches utilizing Oxford Nanopore Technologies Direct RNA Sequencing data were almost exclusively designed to map eukaryotic epitranscriptomes. Therefore, extra caution must be exercised when using these tools to detect vRNA modifications, as in most cases, vRNA modification profiles should be regarded as unknown epitranscriptomes without prior knowledge. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the performance of 10 computational tools in detecting vRNA modification sites. All tested single-mode methods failed to differentiate native and in vitro-transcribed samples. Using optimized cutoff values, seven tested comparative tools generated very different predictions. An integrated analysis showed significant enrichment of Tombo_com and xPore predictions against the background. A pipeline for vRNA modification detection was proposed accordingly and applied to Sindbis virus RNAs. In conclusion, our study underscores the need for the careful application of computational tools to analyze viral epitranscriptomics. It also offers insights into alphaviral RNA modifications, although further validation is required.

Project description:The transcriptomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone C isolates NN2 and SG17M during the mid-exponential and early stationary phases of planktonic growth were evaluated by direct RNA sequencing on the nanopore platform and compared with established short-read cDNA sequencing on the Illumina platform. Fifty to ninety percent of the sense RNAs turned out to be rRNA molecules, followed by similar proportions of mRNA transcripts and noncoding RNAs. The two platforms detected similar proportions of uncharged tRNAs and 29 yet-undescribed antisense tRNAs. For example, the rarest arginine codon was paired with the most abundant tRNAArg, and the tRNAArg gene is missing for the most frequent arginine codon. More than 90% of the antisense RNA molecules were complementary to a coding sequence. The antisense RNAs were evenly distributed in the genomes. Direct RNA sequencing identified more than 4,000 distinct nonoverlapping antisense RNAs during exponential and stationary growth. Besides highly expressed small antisense RNAs less than 200 bases in size, a population of longer antisense RNAs was sequenced that covered a broad range (a few hundred to thousands of bases) and could be complementary to a contig of several genes. In summary, direct RNA sequencing identified yet-undescribed RNA molecules and an unexpected composition of the pools of tRNAs and sense and antisense RNAs. IMPORTANCE Genome-wide gene expression of bacteria is commonly studied by high-throughput sequencing of size-selected cDNA fragment libraries of reverse-transcribed RNA preparations. However, the depletion of rRNAs, enzymatic reverse transcription, and the fragmentation, size selection, and amplification during library preparation lead to inevitable losses of information about the initial composition of the RNA pool. We demonstrate that direct RNA sequencing on the Nanopore platform can overcome these limitations. Nanopore sequencing of total RNA yielded novel insights into the Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome that-if replicated in other species-will change our view of the bacterial RNA world. The discovery of sense-antisense pairs of transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), tRNAs, and mRNAs indicates a further and unknown level of gene regulation in bacteria.

Dataset Information

Systematic comparison of tools used for m⁶A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Publications

Systematic comparison of tools used for m<sup>6</sup>A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Publications

Systematic comparison of tools used for m<sup>6</sup>A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Systematic comparison of tools used for m⁶A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.