Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background and aim
This study aimed to compare patients with and without sedation during emergency endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to clarify the safety and efficacy of sedation in emergency endoscopy.Methods
We retrospectively collected 389 patients who underwent emergency endoscopy for UGIB at Ureshino Medical Center from 2016 to 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: sedation group during emergency endoscopy and nonsedation group. Clinical characteristics, patient status on admission, and UGIB etiology were evaluated. Treatment outcomes and adverse events were evaluated using propensity score matching (PSM), and risk factors for mortality from UGIB were investigated using Cox multivariate analysis.Results
The sedation group was sign
SUBMITTER: Yamaguchi D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10102050 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature