Dataset Information

Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To compare visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap (IF) and peeling (IP) techniques for full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs).

Methods

A retrospective case series with propensity-score matching (PSM). Patients with a minimum 12 months follow-up were divided into IF and IP groups and matched based on FTMH size and preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). BCVA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings were obtained to assess outer retinal layer integrity, foveal thickness, and foveal displacement.

Results

Twenty-six eyes were included in each group after PSM. The IF group showed significantly greater BCVA after 1 month, its corresponding change from preoperative BCVA, proportions of eyes with ellipsoid zone defects <250 μm after 1 month, and interdigitation zone restoration after 6 and 12 months (P = 0.007, 0.038, 0.048, 0.025, and 0.023, respectively), as well as less foveal gliosis after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (P = 0.020, 0.017, 0.050, and 0.024, respectively). In the IP group, the mean outer nuclear layer thickness significantly decreased at 3 (P = 0.019) and 12 months (P = 0.016) compared to 1 month, and the foveal displacement toward the optic disc was significant after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (P = 0.049, 0.006, 0.001, and <0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Compared to IP, IF promoted faster recovery of BCVA and outer retinal layers and was more protective against postoperative foveal thinning and displacement; hence, it should be considered for small and large FTMHs.

SUBMITTER: Kwak JJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10102159 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.

Kwak Jay Jiyong JJ Byeon Suk Ho SH

Eye (London, England) 20220518 6

<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap (IF) and peeling (IP) techniques for full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs).<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective case series with propensity-score matching (PSM). Patients with a minimum 12 months follow-up were divided into IF and IP groups and matched based on FTMH size and preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). BCVA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings were obtained to ass ...[more]

PMID: 35585135

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of macular holes (MHs). However, there is a possibility of poor postoperative anatomical closure with conventional ILM peeling for MHs larger than 400 μm. Therefore, a novel inverted ILM flap technique was developed for such cases.ObjectivesThis meta-analysis study was performed to evaluate and compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique and ILM peeling in large MHs.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The trial eligibility and risk of bias were assessed according to Cochrane review methods. The primary outcome measures included MH closure rate and postoperative visual acuity (VA). Subgroup analysis of postoperative VA based on follow-up time was also conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsFive RCTs with a total of 155 eyes in the inverted ILM flap group and 161 eyes in the ILM peeling group were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical meta-analysis revealed that the overall MH closure rate in the inverted ILM flap group was significantly higher than that in the ILM peeling group (OR = 3.10; 95% CI: 1.25-7.66; p = 0.01). The postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than the ILM peeling group (WMD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.07; p = 0.0002). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated that the postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than the ILM peeling group (WMD = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08; p = 0.0004) at the 3-month follow-up. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up (WMD = -0.09; 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.02; p = 0.10).ConclusionsVitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique showed a higher anatomical closure rate as well as visual gain - although only in the short term as no difference in visual recovery was found at the 6-month follow-up - than did ILM peeling in large MHs. The inverted ILM flap technique should be considered as a preferred and routine procedure for the treatment of patients with MHs larger than 400 µm.

Dataset Information

Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets