Project description:Polygenic risk scores aggregate an individual's burden of risk alleles to estimate the overall genetic risk for a specific trait or disease. Polygenic risk scores derived from genome-wide association studies of European populations perform poorly for other ancestral groups. Given the potential for future clinical utility, underperformance of polygenic risk scores in South Asian populations has the potential to reinforce health inequalities. To determine whether European-derived polygenic risk scores underperform at multiple sclerosis prediction in a South Asian-ancestry population compared with a European-ancestry cohort, we used data from two longitudinal genetic cohort studies: Genes & Health (2015-present), a study of ∼50 000 British-Bangladeshi and British-Pakistani individuals, and UK Biobank (2006-present), which is comprised of ∼500 000 predominantly White British individuals. We compared individuals with and without multiple sclerosis in both studies (Genes & Health: N Cases = 42, N Control = 40 490; UK Biobank: N Cases = 2091, N Control = 374 866). Polygenic risk scores were calculated using clumping and thresholding with risk allele effect sizes obtained from the largest multiple sclerosis genome-wide association study to date. Scores were calculated with and without the major histocompatibility complex region, the most influential locus in determining multiple sclerosis risk. Polygenic risk score prediction was evaluated using Nagelkerke's pseudo-R 2 metric adjusted for case ascertainment, age, sex and the first four genetic principal components. We found that, as expected, European-derived polygenic risk scores perform poorly in the Genes & Health cohort, explaining 1.1% (including the major histocompatibility complex) and 1.5% (excluding the major histocompatibility complex) of disease risk. In contrast, multiple sclerosis polygenic risk scores explained 4.8% (including the major histocompatibility complex) and 2.8% (excluding the major histocompatibility complex) of disease risk in European-ancestry UK Biobank participants. These findings suggest that polygenic risk score prediction of multiple sclerosis based on European genome-wide association study results is less accurate in a South Asian population. Genetic studies of ancestrally diverse populations are required to ensure that polygenic risk scores can be useful across ancestries.

Project description:Understanding the pathogenicity of missense mutation (MM) is essential for shed light on genetic diseases, gene functions, and individual variations. In this study, we propose a novel computational approach, called MMPatho, for enhancing missense mutation pathogenic prediction. First, we established a large-scale nonredundant MM benchmark data set based on the entire Ensembl database, complemented by a focused blind test set specifically for pathogenic GOF/LOF MM. Based on this data set, for each mutation, we utilized Ensembl VEP v104 and dbNSFP v4.1a to extract variant-level, amino acid-level, individuals' outputs, and genome-level features. Additionally, protein sequences were generated using ENSP identifiers with the Ensembl API, and then encoded. The mutant sites' ESM-1b and ProtTrans-T5 embeddings were subsequently extracted. Then, our model group (MMPatho) was developed by leveraging upon these efforts, which comprised ConsMM and EvoIndMM. To be specific, ConsMM employs individuals' outputs and XGBoost with SHAP explanation analysis, while EvoIndMM investigates the potential enhancement of predictive capability by incorporating evolutionary information from ESM-1b and ProtT5-XL-U50, large protein language embeddings. Through rigorous comparative experiments, both ConsMM and EvoIndMM were capable of achieving remarkable AUROC (0.9836 and 0.9854) and AUPR (0.9852 and 0.9902) values on the blind test set devoid of overlapping variations and proteins from the training data, thus highlighting the superiority of our computational approach in the prediction of MM pathogenicity. Our Web server, available at http://csbio.njust.edu.cn/bioinf/mmpatho/, allows researchers to predict the pathogenicity (alongside the reliability index score) of MMs using the ConsMM and EvoIndMM models and provides extensive annotations for user input. Additionally, the newly constructed benchmark data set and blind test set can be accessed via the data page of our web server.

Dataset Information

MUSSEL: Enhanced Bayesian Polygenic Risk Prediction Leveraging Information across Multiple Ancestry Groups.

Publications

MUSSEL: Enhanced Bayesian Polygenic Risk Prediction Leveraging Information across Multiple Ancestry Groups.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets