Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Scoring and awarding credit are more complex for multiple-select items than for single-choice items. Forty-one different scoring methods were retrospectively applied to 2 multiple-select multiple-choice item types (Pick-N and Multiple-True-False [MTF]) from existing examination data.Objective
This study aimed to calculate and compare the mean scores for both item types by applying different scoring methods, and to investigate the effect of item quality on mean raw scores and the likelihood of resulting scores at or above the pass level (≥0.6).Methods
Items and responses from examinees (ie, marking events) were retrieved from previous examinations. Different scoring methods were retrospectively applied to the existing examination data to calculate correspo
SUBMITTER: Kanzow P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10131704 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature