Dataset Information

Trade-Offs between Competitive Ability and Resistance to Top-Down Control in Marine Microbes.

ABSTRACT: Trade-offs between competitive ability and resistance to top-down control manifest the "kill-the-winner" hypothesis that explains how mortality caused by protists and viruses can promote bacterial diversity. However, the existence of such trade-offs has rarely been investigated in natural marine bacterial communities. To address this question, we conducted on-board dilution experiments to manipulate top-down control pressure (protists only or protists plus viruses [protists+viruses] combined) and then applied 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing techniques to assess the responses of each bacterial taxon. Dilution experiments enabled us to measure the top-down-control-free growth rate as the competitive ability and top-down-control-caused mortality as the reverse of resistance to top-down control. Overall, bacterial taxa with higher top-down-control-free growth rates were accompanied by lower top-down-control-caused resistance. Furthermore, competition-resistance trade-offs were stronger and more consistent when top-down control was caused by protists+viruses combined than by protists only. When protists+viruses were diluted, the bacterial rank abundance distribution became steepened and evenness and richness were decreased. However, when protists were diluted, only richness decreased. Our results indicate the existence of competition-resistance trade-offs in marine microbes and demonstrate the positive impacts of such trade-offs on bacterial diversity. Regardless, the strength of the competition-resistance trade-offs and the impacts on bacterial diversity were contingent on whether top-down control was caused by protists+viruses combined or protists only. IMPORTANCE We addressed the "kill-the-winner" hypothesis from the perspective of its principle (the competition-resistance trade-off) in marine bacterial communities incubated in situ. Our results supported the existence of competition-resistance trade-offs and the positive effect on bacterial community diversity. The study linked theoretical expectations and complex natural systems and provided new knowledge regarding how top-down controls and competition trade-offs shaped natural bacterial communities.

SUBMITTER: Yang JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10134844 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Trade-Offs between Competitive Ability and Resistance to Top-Down Control in Marine Microbes.

Yang Jinny Wu JW Chang Feng-Hsun FH Yeh Yi-Chun YC Tsai An-Yi AY Chiang Kuo-Ping KP Shiah Fuh-Kwo FK Gong Gwo-Ching GC Hsieh Chih-Hao CH

mSystems 20230314 2

Trade-offs between competitive ability and resistance to top-down control manifest the "kill-the-winner" hypothesis that explains how mortality caused by protists and viruses can promote bacterial diversity. However, the existence of such trade-offs has rarely been investigated in natural marine bacterial communities. To address this question, we conducted on-board dilution experiments to manipulate top-down control pressure (protists only or protists plus viruses [protists+viruses] combined) an ...[more]

PMID: 36916988

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFighting disease while fighting rivals exposes males to constraints and trade-offs during male-male competition. We here tested how both the stage and intensity of infection with the fungal pathogen Metarhizium robertsii interfere with fighting success in Cardiocondyla obscurior ant males. Males of this species have evolved long lifespans during which they can gain many matings with the young queens of the colony, if successful in male-male competition. Since male fights occur inside the colony, the outcome of male-male competition can further be biased by interference of the colony's worker force.ResultsWe found that severe, but not yet mild, infection strongly impaired male fighting success. In late-stage infection, this could be attributed to worker aggression directed towards the infected rather than the healthy male and an already very high male morbidity even in the absence of fighting. Shortly after pathogen exposure, however, male mortality was particularly increased during combat. Since these males mounted a strong immune response, their reduced fighting success suggests a trade-off between immune investment and competitive ability already early in the infection. Even if the males themselves showed no difference in the number of attacks they raised against their healthy rivals across infection stages and levels, severely infected males were thus losing in male-male competition from an early stage of infection on.ConclusionsMales of the ant C. obscurior have a well-developed immune system that raises a strong immune response very fast after fungal exposure. This allows them to cope with mild pathogen exposures without compromising their success in male-male competition, and hence to gain multiple mating opportunities with the emerging virgin queens of the colony. Under severe infection, however, they are weak fighters and rarely survive a combat already at early infection when raising an immune response, as well as at progressed infection, when they are morbid and preferentially targeted by worker aggression. Workers thereby remove males that pose a future disease threat by biasing male-male competition. Our study thus reveals a novel social immunity mechanism how social insect workers protect the colony against disease risk.

Project description:The tradeoff between colonization and competitive ability has been proposed as a mechanism for ecological succession, and this tradeoff has been demonstrated in multiple successional communities. The tradeoff between competitive ability and predation resistance is also a widely-described phenomenon; however, this tradeoff is not usually postulated as a cause of ecological succession. Early successional species that arrive before predator colonization could be either (1) less vulnerable to predation than their successors, by virtue of being poor competitors (direct competition-predation tradeoff); or (2) equally or more vulnerable to predation, because they normally colonize ahead of predators in succession and therefore are not evolutionarily adapted to avoid predators that they rarely encounter (no competition-predation tradeoff). To test these alternative hypotheses, we established water-filled containers in an oak-hickory forest. We allowed half of the containers to be naturally colonized by early-successional Culex mosquitoes, mid-successional Aedes mosquitoes, and the mosquito predator Toxorhynchites rutilus. In the other half of the containers, we prevented Aedes colonization via systematic removal of Aedes eggs, but allowed Culex and T. rutilus to colonize. The numbers of mature Culex larvae and pupae, and later the total number of Culex, were significantly greater in containers where Aedes had been removed, which suggests that Culex are competitively suppressed by Aedes. Toxorhynchites rutilus abundance and colonization rate were unaffected by the removal of Aedes, and densities of both Culex and Aedes decreased significantly with T. rutilus abundance in both treatments. In-laboratory bioassays showed that Culex were significantly more vulnerable to predation by T. rutilus than were Aedes. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that Culex and Aedes demonstrate a direct colonization-competition tradeoff, and are inconsistent with the hypothesis of a direct competition-predation tradeoff.

Dataset Information

Trade-Offs between Competitive Ability and Resistance to Top-Down Control in Marine Microbes.

Publications

Trade-Offs between Competitive Ability and Resistance to Top-Down Control in Marine Microbes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets