Barriers to enrollment in clinical trials of patients with aggressive B-cell NHL that progressed after CAR T-cell therapy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bezerra ED
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10139860 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Barriers to enrollment in clinical trials of patients with aggressive B-cell NHL that progressed after CAR T-cell therapy.
Bezerra Evandro D ED Iqbal Madiha M Munoz Javier J Khurana Arushi A Wang Yucai Y Maurer Matthew J MJ Bansal Radhika R Hathcock Matthew A MA Bennani Nora N Murthy Hemant S HS Rosenthal Allison C AC Paludo Jonas J Villasboas Jose C JC Johnston Patrick B PB Habermann Thomas M TM Ansell Stephen M SM Castro Januario E JE Witzig Thomas E TE Kharfan-Dabaja Mohamed A MA Nowakowski Grzegorz S GS Lin Yi Y
Blood advances 20230401 8
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10080401 | biostudies-literature
Project description:CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CD19 CAR) T cells are novel therapies showing great promise for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Single-arm studies showed significant variations in outcomes across distinct CD19 CAR T-cell products. To estimate the independent impact of the CAR T-cell product type on outcomes, we retrospectively analyzed data from 129 patients with R/R aggressive B-NHL treated with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine lymphodepletion followed by either a commercially available CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axicel] or tisagenlecleucel [tisacel]), or the investigational product JCAR014 on a phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT01865617). After adjustment for age, hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), largest lesion diameter, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CAR T-cell product type remained associated with outcomes in multivariable models. JCAR014 was independently associated with lower cytokine release syndrome (CRS) severity compared with axicel (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.08-0.46), with a trend toward lower CRS severity with tisacel compared with axicel (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.21-1.06; P = .07). Tisacel (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.48) and JCAR014 (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.47) were both associated with lower immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome severity compared with axicel. Lower odds of complete response (CR) were predicted with tisacel and JCAR014 compared with axicel. Although sensitivity analyses using either positron emission tomography- or computed tomography-based response criteria also suggested higher efficacy of axicel over JCAR014, the impact of tisacel vs axicel became undetermined. Higher preleukapheresis LDH, largest lesion diameter, and lower ALC were independently associated with lower odds of CR. We conclude that CD19 CAR T-cell product type independently impacts toxicity and efficacy in R/R aggressive B-NHL patients.
| S-EPMC9247364 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) do not experience a durable remission. Several novel agents are approved to treat relapsed, refractory aggressive B-NHL; however, it remains unclear how to sequence these therapies pre- and post-CAR-T. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to describe peri-CAR-T practice patterns and survival predictors for patients receiving CD19-directed CAR-T. Patients (n = 514) from 13 centers treated with CAR-T for B-NHL between 2015-2021 were included in the study. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the impact of the variables on survival outcomes. For all patients receiving CAR-T, a greater number of lines of therapy pre-CAR-T apheresis and bridging therapy were predictive of inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The median PFS and OS from the time of CAR-T cell infusion were 7.6 and 25.6 months, respectively. From the time of progression post-CAR-T, the median OS was 5.5 months. The median PFS of treatments administered in the first-line post-CAR-T failure was 2.8 months. Patients with refractory disease on day 30 had inferior OS and were less likely to receive subsequent treatment(s) than other patients with CAR-T failure. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for selected patients at any time following CAR-T failure led to durable responses in over half of patients at 1 year. These data provide a benchmark for future clinical trials in patients with post-CAR-T cell progression, which remains an unmet clinical need.
| S-EPMC10333741 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRecruiting a sufficient number of patients is often a challenge for conducting clinical trials. Published data reveal that only 10% of eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled in clinical trials. Consequentially, identifying barriers and facilitators may improve enrollment. These factors may differ in the pediatric population, for example, due to the involvement of parents in the decision-making process. We aimed to conduct an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric participants in clinical trials.MethodsA systematic literature search in PubMed and Epistemonikos of published systematic reviews focusing on barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials was conducted. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two authors independently. The methodological quality was judged using a critical appraisal tool. Finally, data were narratively synthesized.ResultsOf 283 identified systematic reviews, four met the inclusion criteria and were included in the overview. Parents belonging to an ethnic minority or having low socioeconomic status were identified as barriers to enrollment whereas higher parental education and higher age served as facilitators. Additionally, existing expectations, previous treatment experiences and preferences, study duration, type of control group, and the child's attitude toward study participation could favor or hinder participation. Furthermore, physicians' opinions of study-related treatments may also influence the enrollment process.ConclusionThis overview provides a summary of barriers and facilitators to the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials. Taking into account this information may enhance the enrollment of this hard-to-reach population.
| S-EPMC11577732 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Several recent advances have affected the treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the management of chemorefractory disease. Two randomized studies in early relapse disease have expanded the label to provide access to CAR T-cell therapy as early as second line for some patients. Despite the durable remissions that have been achieved, many patients will experience relapse. There is a growing population of patients previously treated with CAR T-cell therapy facing dismal outcomes. We review the prospective studies that inform treatment options in later lines and highlight the limited data examining outcomes with novel therapies after CAR T-cell failure. The treatment landscape is anticipated to continue to evolve with the emergence of bispecific antibodies that appear to be a promising approach, particularly after CAR T-cell therapy, although little is known about overlapping mechanisms of resistance. Enrichment for patients who have received prior CAR T-cell therapy on prospective trials is a critical unmet need to inform the preferred management for these high-risk patients.
| S-EPMC10727106 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Many factors contribute to the poor survival of malignant brain tumor patients, some of which are not easily remedied. However, one contributor to the lack of progress that may be modifiable is poor clinical trial accrual. Surveys of brain tumor patients and neuro-oncology providers suggest that clinicians do a poor job of discussing clinical trials with patients and referring patients for clinical trials. Yet, data from the Cancer Action Network of the American Cancer Society suggest that most eligible oncology patients asked to enroll on a clinical trial will agree to do so. To this end, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) in collaboration with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, including the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC), and other partners are working together with the intent to double clinical trial accrual over the next 5 years. Here we describe the factors contributing to poor clinical trial accrual in neuro-oncology and offer possible solutions.
| S-EPMC7594546 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Adolescent and young adult (AYA) enrollment in cancer clinical trials (CCT) is suboptimal. Few studies have explored site level barriers and facilitators to AYA enrollment on CCTs and the efficacy of interventions to enhance enrollment. A cross sectional survey was developed by the COG AYA Oncology Discipline Committee Responsible Investigator (RI) Network to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to enrollment, as well as opportunities to improve enrollment. Associations of barriers and facilitators to enrollment with program demographics were assessed. The survey was sent to all AYA RI Network members (n = 143) and quantitative and thematic analyses were conducted. The overall response rate was 42% (n = 60/143). Participants represented diverse institutions based on size, presence or absence of dedicated AYA programs, and proximity and relationship between pediatric and medical oncology practices within the institution. The most frequently cited barriers to enrolling AYAs in CCTs were administrative logistical issues (45%), disparate enrollment practices (42%) and communication issues (27%) between pediatric and medical oncology and perceived limited trial availability (27%). The most frequently reported facilitators to enrollment included having strong communication between pediatric and medical oncology (48%), having a supportive research infrastructure (35%) and the presence of AYA champions (33%). Many barriers and facilitators were similar across institutions and AYA program types. Shared barriers and facilitators to AYA CCT enrollment exist across the landscape of cancer care settings. Interventions aimed at increasing coordination between pediatric and medical oncology clinical trials offices and providers have high potential to improve site-level AYA enrollment.
| S-EPMC8907177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a novel, customized immunotherapy that is considered a 'living' and self-replicating drug to treat cancer, sometimes resulting in a complete cure. CAR T-cells are manufactured through genetic engineering of T-cells by equipping them with CARs to detect and target antigen-expressing cancer cells. CAR is designed to have an ectodomain extracellularly, a transmembrane domain spanning the cell membrane, and an endodomain intracellularly. Since its first discovery, the CAR structure has evolved greatly, from the first generation to the fifth generation, to offer new therapeutic alternatives for cancer patients. This treatment has achieved long-term and curative therapeutic efficacy in multiple blood malignancies that nowadays profoundly change the treatment landscape of lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. But CART-cell therapy is associated with several hurdles, such as limited therapeutic efficacy, little effect on solid tumors, adverse effects, expensive cost, and feasibility issues, hindering its broader implications.
| S-EPMC9746433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of adoptive T-cell therapy is to promote tumor-infiltrating immune cells following the transfer of either tumor-harvested or genetically engineered T lymphocytes. A new chapter in adoptive T-cell therapy began with the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. T cells harvested from peripheral blood are transduced with genetically engineered CARs that render the ability to recognize cancer cell-surface antigen and lyse cancer cells. The successes in CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell leukemia and lymphoma have led to efforts to expand this therapy to solid tumors. Herein, we discuss the rationale behind the preclinical development and clinical trials of T-cell therapies in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Furthermore, we highlight the ongoing investigation of combination immunotherapy strategies to synergistically potentiate endogenous as well as adoptively transferred immunity.
| S-EPMC8184643 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has made tremendous strides in the arena of hematological malignancies with approved therapies in certain leukemias, lymphomas, and recently myeloma with overall highly favorable response rates. While numerous clinical studies are still ongoing for hematological malignancies, research is developing to translate the feasibility of CAR T therapy in solid organ malignancies. Unfortunately, the majority of diagnosed cancers are primarily solid tumors. Thus, a highly unmet clinical need for further research and development exists in this field. This review article highlights currently active clinical trials and a few pertinent preclinical studies involving CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors while briefly discussing study outcomes and potential key targets that may allow for the feasibility of this therapy option. Finally, we mention critical challenges existing in the solid tumor environment and discuss developing strategies that may potentially overcome the existing barriers to CAR T cell progress in solid tumors.
| S-EPMC9175685 | biostudies-literature