Dataset Information

Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Lung cancer (LC) represents the second most diagnosed tumor and the malignancy with the highest mortality rate. In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of this tumor thanks to the discovery, testing, and clinical approval of novel therapeutic approaches. Firstly, targeted therapies aimed at inhibiting specific mutated tyrosine kinases or downstream factors were approved in clinical practice. Secondly, immunotherapy inducing the reactivation of the immune system to efficiently eliminate LC cells has been approved. This review describes in depth both current and ongoing clinical studies, which allowed the approval of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors as standard of care for LC. Moreover, the present advantages and pitfalls of new therapeutic approaches will be discussed. Finally, the acquired importance of human microbiota as a novel source of LC biomarkers, as well as therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of available therapies, was analyzed. Therapy against LC is increasingly becoming holistic, taking into consideration not only the genetic landscape of the tumor, but also the immune background and other individual variables, such as patient-specific gut microbial composition. On these bases, in the future, the research milestones reached will allow clinicians to treat LC patients with tailored approaches.

SUBMITTER: Leone GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10142433 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer.

Leone Gian Marco GM Candido Saverio S Lavoro Alessandro A Vivarelli Silvia S Gattuso Giuseppe G Calina Daniela D Libra Massimo M Falzone Luca L

Pharmaceutics 20230416 4

Lung cancer (LC) represents the second most diagnosed tumor and the malignancy with the highest mortality rate. In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of this tumor thanks to the discovery, testing, and clinical approval of novel therapeutic approaches. Firstly, targeted therapies aimed at inhibiting specific mutated tyrosine kinases or downstream factors were approved in clinical practice. Secondly, immunotherapy inducing the reactivation of the immune system to eff ...[more]

PMID: 37111737

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a revolutionary milestone in the field of immune-oncology. However, the low response rate is the major problem of ICI treatment. The recent studies showed that response rate to single-agent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition in unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is 25% so that researchers defined several biomarkers to predict the response of immunotherapy in ICIs treatment. Common biomarkers like tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression have several limitations, such as low accuracy and inadequately validated cutoff value.MethodsTwo published and an unpublished ICIs treatment NSCLC cohorts with 129 patients were collected and divided into a training cohort (n = 53), a validation cohort (n = 22), and two independent test cohorts (n = 34 and n = 20). We identified six immune-related pathways whose mutational status was significantly associated with overall survival after ICIs treatment. Then these pathways mutational status combined with TMB, PD-L1 expression and intratumor heterogeneity were incorporated to build a Bayesian-regularization neural networks (BRNN) model to predict the ICIs treatment response.ResultsWe firstly proved that TMB, PD-L1, and mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) were independent biomarkers. The survival analysis of six immune-related pathways revealed the mutational status could distinguish overall survival after ICIs treatment. When predicting immunotherapy efficacy, the overall accuracy of area under curve (AUC) in validation cohort reaches 0.85, outperforming previous predictors in either sensitivity or specificity. And the AUC in two independent test cohorts reach 0.74 and 0.80.ConclusionWe developed a pathway-model that could predict the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC patients. Our study made a significant contribution to solving the low prediction accuracy of immunotherapy of single biomarker. With the accumulation of larger data sets, further studies are warranted to refine the predictive performance of the approach.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by activating the immune system, a mechanism that may also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study seeks to investigate on how different irAEs impact prognosis of advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and identify useful approaches to manage irAEs.MethodsA thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and manual searches up to January 2024 were undertaken. Treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were obtained. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.1).ResultsThere were 106 studies with 41,050 advanced or recurrent LC patients included. The occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.59], OS (HR =0.57; 0.51-0.63), ORR [risk ratio (RR) =2.03; 95% CI: 1.81-2.28] and DCR (RR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.40-1.72) and remained significant after adjusting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. IrAEs affecting skin (OS: HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.38-0.53) and endocrine system (OS: HR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.62), of mild severity (OS: HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.35-0.79), arising in multiple sites (OS: HR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59), induced by monotherapy (OS: HR =0.58; 95% CI: 0.52-0.65), with a delayed onset (cutoff: 3 months; OS: HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.71) were identified as positive prognostic markers. In contrast, though pulmonary irAEs were found to be corelated with enhanced treatment response (ORR: RR =1.75; 95% CI: 1.37-2.25), they may harm survival, especially those with grade ≥3 (OS: HR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.39-4.14). Treatment resumption tended to improve PFS but might not reduce the risk of death compared to permanent discontinuation.ConclusionsIrAEs suggest better treatment outcomes generally, yet severe pneumonia could increase mortality risk. Close supervision and appropriate handling protocols are warranted to weigh treatment benefit against risk.

Project description:Background Radiation pneumonitis and immune-related pneumonitis have been studied independently, but little information has emerged on the interactions between radiation therapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). We examine whether RT and ICI are synergistic in causing pneumonitis. Methods A retrospective cohort was assembled using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, including Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th ed. (AJCC) stages IIIB–IV NSCLC between 2013–2017. Exposures to RT and ICI were determined by evaluating for treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (RT group and ICI group) and for a second exposure (e.g., ICI after RT) within 3 months after the first exposure (RT + ICI group). Untreated controls were matched to treated patients who were diagnosed in the same three-month window. A validated algorithm for identifying cases of pneumonitis in claims data was used to evaluate for the outcome within 6 months after treatment. The primary outcome was the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), a quantitative measure of additive interaction between two treatments. Results There were 18,780 patients included in the analysis with 9,345 (49.8%), 7,533 (40.2%), 1,332 (7.1%), and 550 (2.9%) in the control, RT, ICI, and RT + ICI groups, respectively. Relative to controls, the hazards ratios of pneumonitis were 11.5 (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.0), 6.2 (95% CI: 3.8 to 10.3), and 10.7 (95% CI: 6.0 to 19.2) in the RT, ICI, and RT-ICI groups, respectively. The RERIs were −6.1 (95% CI: −13.1 to −0.6, P=0.97) and −4.0 (95% CI: −10.7 to 1.5, P=0.91) in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, respectively, consistent with no evidence of additive interaction (RERI ≤0) between RT and ICI. Conclusions In this study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced NSCLC, RT and ICI were, at most, additive rather than synergistic in causing pneumonitis. Pneumonitis risk in patients treated with RT and ICI is not more than could be expected from each therapy alone.

Dataset Information

Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer.

Publications

Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets