Outcome comparison of pyrotinib with current standard of care in the second/third line setting in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with HER2 mutation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Mao S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10150891 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Outcome comparison of pyrotinib with current standard of care in the second/third line setting in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with HER2 mutation.
Mao Shiqi S Luo Libo L Yang Shuo S Wang Yan Y Zhou Fei F Yu Jia J Chen Bin B Gao Guanghui G Li Xuefei X Zhao Chao C Cheng Lei L Liu Yiwei Y Wang Wanying W Jia Keyi K Shao Chuchu C Liu Xinyu X Chen Xiaoxia X Su Chunxia C Zhou Caicun C Wu Fengying F Ren Shengxiang S
Chinese medical journal 20230405 7
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThis study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of elacestrant (ELA) and standard-of-care (SOC) as second-/third-line treatment for pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC) in the US.MethodsThe 3 health states partitioned survival model (PSM) was conducted from the perspective of the US third-party payers. The time horizon for the model lasted 10 years. Effectiveness and safety data were derived from the EMERALD trial (NCT03778931). Costs were derived from the pricing files of Medicare and Medicaid Services, and utility values were derived from published studies. One-way sensitivity analysis as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to observe model stability.ResultELA led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $8,672,360/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with SOC in the overall population and $2,900,560/QALY gained compared with fulvestrant (FUL) in the ESR1(estrogen receptor 1) mutation subgroup. The two ICERs of ELA were significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $150,000/QALY.ConclusionsELA was not cost-effective for the second-/third-line treatment of patients with ER+/HER2-A/MBC compared with SOC in the US.
| S-EPMC10758478 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors has dramatically improved care for the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, but navigating the rapidly-expanding treatment evidence base is challenging. In this narrative review, we provide best-practice recommendations for the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in Canada based on relevant literature, clinical guidelines, and our own clinical experience. Due to statistically significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor is our preferred first-line treatment for de novo advanced disease or relapse ≥12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ribociclib or abemaciclib + fulvestrant is our preferred first-line treatment for patients experiencing early relapse. Abemaciclib or palbociclib may be used when alternatives to ribociclib are needed, and endocrine therapy can be used alone in the case of contraindication to CDK4/6 inhibitors or limited life expectancy. Considerations for special populations-including frail and fit elderly patients, as well as those with visceral disease, brain metastases, and oligometastatic disease-are also explored. For monitoring, we recommend an approach across CDK4/6 inhibitors. For mutational testing, we recommend routinely performing ER/PR/HER2 testing to confirm the subtype of advanced disease at the time of progression and to consider ESR1 and PIK3CA testing for select patients. Where possible, engage a multidisciplinary care team to apply evidence in a patient-centric manner.
| S-EPMC10297170 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite the success of anti-HER2 therapy in patients with breast cancer with HER2 amplification or HER2 overexpression, the results of clinical trials on anti-HER2 therapy for lung cancer have not been satisfactory. The aim of the present study was to report a case of a non-smoker, female patient diagnosed with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma harboring HER2 amplification. The disease progressed despite surgery and multiple lines of chemotherapy, plus trastuzumab or lapatinib. The pan-ErbB inhibitor pyrotinib (400 mg/day) was commenced as a fourth-line regimen, and the patient achieved complete response with a time to progression (TTP) of 6 months. After the lung adenocarcinoma progressed, pyrotinib was continued, along with anlotinib and nivolumab. The patient achieved stable disease (SD) status with another 6 months of TTP. The overall survival of the patient was 28 months. Therefore, the present case suggests that the development of novel drugs may provide new and effective therapeutic regimens for lung cancer with HER2 amplification.
| S-EPMC8408680 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The prognosis of patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGC) remains poor. Current available systemic armamentarium is limited, and little progress has been made over the last decades. Main achievements have been obtained in first-line setting, however an increasingly proportion of patients are considered for second-line therapy, although data from randomized trials are scarce or even lacking. In this comprehensive review we examine the literature to summarize the efficacy and limitations of second-line systemic options in patients with advanced UGC, with a glimpse into the innovations.
| S-EPMC5934153 | biostudies-other
Project description:Most patients with lung cancer have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype and have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Improvements in both first-line and subsequent therapies are allowing longer survival and enhanced quality of life for these patients. The median overall survival observed in many second-line trials is approximately 9 months, and many patients receive further therapy after second-line therapy. The cytotoxic agents pemetrexed and docetaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib and gefitinib are standard second-line therapies. For patients with EGFR mutation, a TKI is the favored second-line therapy if not already used in first-line therapy. For patients without the EGFR mutation, TKIs are an option, but many oncologists favor cytotoxic therapy. The inhibitor of the EML4/ALK fusion protein, crizotinib, has recently become a standard second-line treatment for patients with the gene rearrangement and has promise for patients with the ROS1 rearrangement.
| S-EPMC3755933 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with recurrent/metastatic endometrial cancer that progresses after chemotherapy have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Preclinical data suggest the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may provide clinical benefit in these patients.MethodsIn this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer refractory to one or two previous chemotherapy regimens received everolimus 10 mg per day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the non-progressive disease rate at 3 months. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free, and overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsForty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 65 years); 66% received one previous chemotherapy regimen. The 3-month non-progressive disease rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 22-52%), including two patients (5%) with partial response (PR). At 6 months, two additional patients experienced PR. Median duration of response was 3.1 months. Median progression-free and OS were 2.8 months and 8.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were anaemia (100%), fatigue (93%), hypercholesterolaemia (81%), and lymphopenia (81%).ConclusionEverolimus demonstrated efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. These results support the further development of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-targeted therapies in endometrial cancer.
| S-EPMC3658508 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Increasing evidences from phase II or III trials have proved that salvage systematic therapy, including chemotherapy, target therapy, or checkpoint inhibitor therapy can prolong survival in patients who do not succeed with second line therapy, yet there are no guidelines for the optimum third-line treatments. To compare the effectiveness and safety of current third-line therapies for metastatic Gastric Cancer (mGC), we conducted this network analysis. Methods: Literature up to Sep 30, 2019 were systematically searched and analyzed by a Bayesian fixed-effect model. Results: This study included seven randomized clinical trails which involved 2,655 patients. It turns out that for overall survival, nivolumab has the highest probability to be the optimal choice for overall survival (OS). For patients with no peritoneal metastases, the network meta-analysis showed that Nivolumab (HR:0.64; 95% CI: 0.48-0.85) and Trifluridine/tipiacil (HR:0.66; 95% CI: 0.51-0.86) were associated with significantly higher improvement in OS than placebo. However, patients with peritoneal metastases could not benefit from nivolumab, ramucirumab, or Trifluridine/tipiacil, when compared with a placebo. For progression-free survival, apatinib (850 mg) was the most likely candidate, followed by ramucirumab. Statistically, Apatinib (850 mg), Trifluridine/tipiacil, and SLC had higher incidences of high-grade adverse events (AEs) than placebo. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that nivolumab has the best balance between acceptability and effectiveness in the third line therapy for mGC.
| S-EPMC7191061 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have a poor prognosis and a substantial unmet clinical need. The study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with lenvatinib for advanced iCCA in second-line setting.MethodsThe patients at multiple centers, who progressed after the first-line chemotherapy or could not tolerate chemotherapy, were treated with the combination of sintilimab plus lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and the secondary endpoints included tumor objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 41 patients with advanced iCCA were enrolled for this multi-center observational study. Under a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the median age was 59 years (range, 33-75 years). Sixteen patients died of disease progression, with a median TTP of 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.9-8.3). ORR and DCR were 46.3% and 70.3%, respectively. The patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥10% reported a significantly higher ORR compared to those with PD-L1 TPS <10%, 93.8% (15/16) vs. 16.0% (4/25), p<0.001. The median TTP was significantly improved in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥10%, 16.9 months (95% CI, 7.5-26.3) vs. 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-6.4), p=0.001. Attaining treatment response predicts favorable TTP in a multivariate Cox model. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with 70.3% probability, and no treatment-related death had been reported.ConclusionThe combination of sintilimab plus lenvatinib is effective and well tolerated for advanced iCCA in the second-line setting. PD-L1 TPS expression may predict the efficacy of the combination therapy. Further investigation is warranted to investigate this combination regimen in advanced iCCA.
| S-EPMC9333059 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The study of DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 demonstrated the favorable efficacy and optimal dosage of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in managing the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received previous treatment. The study sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd in both the United States (US) and Chinese healthcare systems. Markov models were developed to evaluate the overall cost, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and life years (LYs) of treatment with T-DXd compared with docetaxel, nivolumab, and pyrotinib for patients in the US and China. The level of willingness-to-pay (WTP) in the US and China is 150,000/QALYs and 32,517/QALYs, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to ensure the precision of the model. T-DXd yielded additional QALYs of 0.63 and 0.06 with an ICER of $338997.84 and $1437258.33 per QALY, respectively, in the US compared to the docetaxel and nivolumab regimens. And T-DXd yielded additional QALYs of 0.63, 0.06, and 0.13 with an ICER of $137959.45, $623805.93, and $515447.12 per QALY, respectively, in China compared to the docetaxel, nivolumab, and pyrotinib regimens. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of drugs is the most influential factor. T-DXd provides substantial therapeutic benefit for NSCLC patients with HER2 mutations who have had previous treatment but is not deemed cost-effective in either the US or China when compared to docetaxel, nivolumab, and pyrotinib. Price reduction is perhaps the main way to make T-DXd cost-effective.
| S-EPMC11853545 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal malignant diseases worldwide. The majority of patients present with advanced disease and, therefore, need palliative chemotherapy. Some chemotherapeutic regimens have been well established as first-line therapies and have been shown to increase survival; however, almost all patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will experience disease progression after first-line therapy. Nevertheless, many patients who retain good performance status after initial treatment remain good candidates for additional therapy. Historically, few studies have assessed second-line therapy, with most reports representing small phase II trials with variable findings; however, clinical research for second-line treatment has increased in the past decade, and several randomized controlled trials using different regimens have been published. The current literature shows varying results on treatment efficacy and tolerability. Thus, we reviewed the published data on the use of chemotherapy in the second-line setting for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
| S-EPMC6084072 | biostudies-literature