Dataset Information

Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) is a new burnout measure developed to replace the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Studies have supported the psychometric properties and cross-cultural measurement invariance of the BAT. However, some unresolved questions remain. These questions are the appropriate level of score interpretation, convergent validity with the MBI, and measurement invariance using sample groups from countries outside of Europe.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional survey approach to obtain 794 participants from Australia (n = 200), the Netherlands (n = 199), South Africa (n = 197), and the United States (n = 198). In brief, we used bifactor modelling to investigate the appropriate score interpretation and convergent validity with the MBI. Hereafter, we used the Rasch model and ordinal logistic regression to investigate differential item functioning.

Results

The bifactor model showed a large general factor and four small group factors, which suggests calculating and interpreting a general burnout score. This model further shows that the BAT and MBI measure the same burnout construct but that the BAT is a more comprehensive burnout measure. Most items fit the Rasch model, and few showed non-negligible differential item functioning.

Conclusions

Our results support the psychometric properties and cross-cultural measurement invariance of the BAT in Australia, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the United States. Furthermore, we provide some clarity on the three previously mentioned unresolved questions.

SUBMITTER: Redelinghuys K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10161461 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries.

Redelinghuys Kleinjan K Morgan Brandon B

BMC public health 20230504 1

<h4>Background</h4>The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) is a new burnout measure developed to replace the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Studies have supported the psychometric properties and cross-cultural measurement invariance of the BAT. However, some unresolved questions remain. These questions are the appropriate level of score interpretation, convergent validity with the MBI, and measurement invariance using sample groups from countries outside of Europe.<h4>Methods</h4>We used a cross-sec ...[more]

PMID: 37143022

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsOccupational Burnout (OB) is currently measured through several Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and some of them have become widely used in occupational health research and practice. We, therefore, aimed to review and grade the psychometric validity of the five OB PROMs considered as valid for OB measure in mental health professionals (the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Pines' Burnout Measure (BM), the Psychologist Burnout Inventory (PBI), the OLdenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)).MethodsWe conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE databases. We reviewed studies published between January 1980 and September 2018 following a methodological framework, in which each step of PROM validation, the reference method, analytical technics and result interpretation criteria were assessed. Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments we evaluated the risk of bias in studies assessing content and criterion validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing and responsiveness of each PROM. Finally, we assessed the level of evidence for the validity of each PROM using the GRADE approach.ResultsWe identified 6541 studies, 19 of which were included for review. Fifteen studies dealt with MBI whereas BM, PBI, OLBI and CBI were each examined in only one study. OLBI had the most complete validation, followed by CBI, MBI, BM and PBI, respectively. When examining the result interpretation correctness, the strongest disagreement was observed for MBI (27% of results), BM (25%) and CBI (17%). There was no disagreement regarding PBI and OLBI. For OLBI and CBI, the quality of evidence for sufficient content validity, the crucial psychometric property, was moderate; for MBI, BM and PBI, it was very low.ConclusionTo be validly and reliably used in medical research and practice, PROM should exhibit robust psychometric properties. Among the five PROMs reviewed, CBI and, to a lesser extent, OLBI meet this prerequisite. The cross-cultural validity of these PROMs was beyond the scope of our work and should be addressed in the future. Moreover, the development of a diagnostic standard for OB would be helpful to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the PROMs and further reexamine their validity.The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42019124621).

Project description:BackgroundMany workplaces, within the healthcare sector, experience high rates of mental health problems such as burnout, anxiety, and depression, due to poor psychosocial working conditions and midwives are not an exception. To develop preventive interventions, epidemiologic surveillance of burnout levels, and their relation to professional specific working conditions is needed. Aims of this study is to assess the construct validity of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) in the context of Swedish midwives, to evaluate whether the item responses can be combined into a single score and differential item functioning regarding age. Another aim was to assess the burnout levels of Swedish midwives.MethodsData come from a national cohort of Swedish midwives (n = 1664). The construct validity was evaluated using Rasch analysis. Burnout levels were presented by median and first (Q1) and third (Q3) quartiles for the BAT total score and the four subscales (exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive and emotional impairment).ResultsIn the analysis including all 23 items the fit to the Rasch model was not obtained. Items within each subscale clustered together in a residual correlation matrix in a pattern consistent with the underlying conceptualization of the BAT, indicating multidimensionality. The Rasch analysis was re-run using the four testlets as input variables which resulted in a good fit. The median burnout level was 2.0 (Q1 = 1.6, Q3 = 2.4). The four subscales differentiated the picture (elevated levels on exhaustion and low levels on the other three subscales).ConclusionsThe construct validity of the BAT for use in the context of Swedish midwives was confirmed. The results indicated a strong general factor, meaning that the responses can be combined into a single burnout score. The scale works invariantly for different age groups. The results of this study secure access to a validated instrument to be used for accurate assessment of the burnout levels among midwives in Sweden.

Dataset Information

Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets