Snakes and ladders: A qualitative study understanding the active ingredients of social interaction around the use of audit and feedback.

ABSTRACT: Explore characteristics of the facilitator, group, and interaction that influence whether a group discussion about data leads to the identification of a clearly specified action plan. Peer-facilitated group discussions among primary care physicians were carried out and recorded. A follow-up focus group was conducted with peer facilitators to explore which aspects of the discussion promoted action planning. Qualitative data was analyzed using an inductive-deductive thematic analysis approach using the conceptual model developed by Cooke et al. Group discussions were coded case-specifically and then analyzed to identify which themes influenced action planning as it relates to performance improvement. Physicians were more likely to interact with practice-level data and explore actions for per

SUBMITTER: Desveaux L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10182419 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature