Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Study design
Retrospective cohort study.Objective
To (1) define utilization trends for navigated instrumented posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), (2) compare reasons and rates of revision at 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year follow-up, and (3) compare 90-day perioperative complications between navigated versus conventional instrumented PLF.Methods
Patients who underwent navigated or conventional instrumented PLF were identified from the Humana insurance database using the PearlDiver Patient Records between 2007-2017. Usage of navigation was characterized. Patient demographics and operative characteristics (number of levels fused, interbody usage) were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Propensity score matching was done and comparisons were made for revision rates
SUBMITTER: Bovonratwet P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10189316 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature