Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Response to van Dyck, O'Dell, & Mecca letter to the editor regarding Andrews et al. (2019).

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Andrews JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10189864 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Response to van Dyck, O'Dell, & Mecca letter to the editor regarding Andrews et al. (2019).

Andrews J Scott JS Desai Urvi U Kirson Noam Y NY Matthews Brandy R BR

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) 20230401 2

PMID: 37206624

Similar Datasets

Letter to the Editor response: Nygaard et al.

Project description:The article by Nygaard and others (2016) proposes that applying batch correction approaches to microarray data from studies with unbalanced designs may inadvertently exaggerate the differences observed. In seeking to illustrate their point, Nygaard and others (2016) utilized a dataset (GSE61901) from a study we published (Towfic and others, 2014) and showed that one analysis pipeline utilizing the traditional approach to batch correction (ComBat) yielded over 1000 differentially expressed probesets, while an alternative approach proposed by Nygaard and others (2016). (utilizing batch as a fixed effect and averaging technical replicates) recovered 11 differentially expressed probesets.

| S-EPMC5379915 | biostudies-literature

Response to Letter to the Editor by Goupell et al.