The association of cardiac troponin and cardiovascular events in patients with concomitant heart failure preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
SUBMITTER: Kim B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10207698 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:AimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are interlinked and frequently coexisting conditions. To date, patients with AF and HFpEF have limited evidence guiding their management. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of adverse outcomes among patients with AF and HFpEF.MethodsThe Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. From the registry, we explored predictors for a composite of cardiac death or HF hospitalization among AF patients with HFpEF (defined as having a prior HF hospitalization or New York Heart Association class ≥2 in association with heart disease and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%). Besides, we investigated whether the scoring using the predictors identified by the Fushimi AF Registry could stratify the outcomes in patients with AF and HFpEF registered in another independent Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure Registry.ResultsOf 755 patients with AF and HFpEF [mean age: 77.5 ± 9.9 years; female: 391 (52%); paroxysmal AF: 258 (34%); and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.5 ± 1.5], cardiac death or HF hospitalization occurred in 246 patients (33%) during the median follow-up period of 4.4 years in the Fushimi AF Registry. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, age ≥75 years [hazard ratio (HR): 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26-2.36] and non-cardiovascular comorbidities such as anaemia (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.37-2.46), chronic kidney disease (HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.27-2.26), diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.09) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.08-3.22) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Meanwhile, cardiovascular comorbidities including coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy were not significantly associated with adverse outcomes. These results were also the case when analysed for patients with AF and HFpEF who registered in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry (N = 878). The score assigning 1 point for each five predictors (age, anaemia, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ranging 0-5 points) stratified the incidence of adverse outcomes among patients with AF and HFpEF registered in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure Registry as well as among those in the Fushimi AF Registry (both log-rank; P < 0.001).ConclusionsNon-cardiovascular comorbidities such as anaemia, diabetes mellitus and kidney or pulmonary disease in addition to advanced age were independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with AF and HFpEF. Our study suggests the importance of focusing on these non-cardiovascular comorbidities for individualized risk stratification and optimal management in patients with AF and HFpEF.
| S-EPMC11769661 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsData regarding prognostic events following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are scarce. We conducted this study to compare the incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) following CA for AF between patients with HFpEF and those with systolic heart failure (HF).Methods and resultsThis single-centre observational study included 142 patients with HF who underwent CA for AF (median follow-up: 4.0 [2.6, 6.3] years). The patients were grouped based on the presence of HFpEF (n = 84) and systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, n = 58). We compared the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of MACE, comprising all-cause death, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH), and HF hospitalization (HFH) between both groups and the number of HFH before and after CA in each group. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictors of MACE in patients with HFpEF. The incidence of MACE was comparable between the groups (following the first procedure: HFpEF: 23%, 4.7/100 person-years, vs. systolic HF: 28%, 6.6/100 person-years, P = 0.18; last procedure: 20%, 4.8/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 6.9/100 person-years, P = 0.21). Although the incidence of HFH was lower in patients with HFpEF than in those with systolic HF (first procedure: 14%, 2.9/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 5.7/100 person-years, P = 0.07; last procedure: 11%, 2.5/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 6.9/100 person-years, P = 0.01), the incidence of CVH was higher (first procedure: 8%, 1.7/100 person-years, vs. 5%, 1.2/100 person-years, P = 0.74; last procedure: 6%, 1.4/100 person-years, vs. 2%, 0.5/100 person-years, P = 0.4). The number of HFH significantly decreased in both groups after CA (HFpEF: 1 hospitalization [the first and third quartiles: 0, 1] in pre-CA, vs. 0 hospitalizations [0, 0] in post-CA, P < 0.0001; systolic HF: 1 hospitalization [0, 1], vs. 0 hospitalizations [0, 0], P < 0.005). The proportion of HFH among total clinical events was significantly smaller in patients with HFpEF than in those with systolic HF (following the first procedure: 56% vs. 88%, P < 0.005; last procedure: 52% vs. 92%, P < 0.005).ConclusionsCA for AF could be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, similar to those with systolic HF. However, clinical events other than HFH should be considered cautiously in such patients.
| S-EPMC9715889 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundParoxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) are common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the implications of left atrial (LA) myopathy and dysrhythmia across the spectrum of AF burden in HFpEF.MethodsConsecutive patients with HFpEF (n = 285) and control subjects (n = 146) underwent invasive exercise testing and echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure, function, and pericardial restraint.ResultsPatients with HFpEF were categorized into stages of AF progression: 181 (65%) had no history of AF, 49 (18%) had paroxysmal AF, and 48 (17%) had permanent AF. Patients with permanent AF were more congested with greater pulmonary vascular disease and lower cardiac output. LA volumes increased, while LA compliance, LA reservoir strain, and right ventricular function decreased with increasing AF burden. The presence of permanent AF was characterized by a distinct pathophysiology, with greater total heart volume caused by atrial dilatation, leading to elevated filling pressures through heightened pericardial restraint. Survival decreased with increasing AF burden. Ten-year progression to permanent AF was common, particularly in paroxysmal AF (52%), and the likelihood of AF progression increased with higher AF stage, poorer LA compliance, and lower LA strain.ConclusionsLA compliance and mechanics progressively decline with increasing AF burden in HFpEF, increasing risk for new onset AF and progressive AF. These changes promote development of a unique phenotype of HFpEF characterized by heightened ventricular interaction, right heart failure, and worsening pulmonary vascular disease. Further study is required to identify therapeutic interventions targeting LA myopathy to improve outcomes in HFpEF.
| S-EPMC7455760 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist with overlapping pathophysiology like left atrial (LA) remodeling, which might differ given different underlying mechanisms.ObjectivesWe sought to investigate the different patterns of LA wall remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.MethodsWe compared LA wall characteristics including wall volume (LAWV), wall thickness (LAWT), and wall thickness heterogeneity (LAWT[SD]) and LA structure, function among the controls (without AF or HFpEF, n = 115), HFpEF alone (n = 59), AF alone (n = 37), and HFpEF+AF (n = 38) groups using multi-detector computed tomography and echocardiography.ResultsLA wall remodeling was most predominant and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was worst in HFpEF+AF patients as compared to the rest. Despite lower E/e' (9.8 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 6.4) yet comparable LA volume, LAWT and PALS in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone, LAWV [12.6 (11.6-15.3) vs. 12.0 (10.2-13.7); p = 0.01] and LAWT(SD) [0.68 (0.61-0.71) vs. 0.60 (0.56-0.65); p < 0.001] were significantly greater in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone even after multi-variate adjustment and propensity matching. After excluding the HFpEF+AF group, both LAWV and LAWT [SD] provided incremental values when added to PALS or LAVi (all p for net reclassification improvement <0.05) in discriminating AF alone, with LAWT[SD] yielding the largest C-statistic (0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86) among all LA wall indices.ConclusionsDespite a similar extent of LA enlargement and dysfunction in HFpEF vs. AF alone, larger LAWV and LAWT [SD] can distinguish AF from HFpEF alone, suggesting the distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanism of LA remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.
| S-EPMC9086706 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7529338 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related advanced liver fibrosis (Stage 3 or 4) was reported to be linked to worse prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aims to assess the relationship between liver fibrosis scores and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence in patients with HFpEF in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial.Methods and resultsBaseline liver fibrosis levels, assessed by NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) or Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), with AF incidence were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) using the Cox proportional hazard model. The risk for advanced fibrosis was estimated to be 21.5% (447/2072) as assessed by FIB-4 (>3.25) and 4.2% (88/2072) as assessed by NFS (>0.676) in HFpEF patients without baseline AF. After a median follow-up of 3.11 years, 106 new-onset AF cases occurred. In multivariate analysis, elevated NFS [NFS = -1.455-0.676: HR 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-4.68; NFS > 0.676: HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.27-6.80; per 1 unit increase: HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32], not FIB-4 (FIB-4 = 1.45-3.25: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67-1.55; FIB-4 > 3.25: HR 1.69, 95% CI 0.76-3.79; per 1 unit increase: HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37), was associated with increased AF incidence. The NFS (C-index 0.662), not FIB-4 (C-index 0.531), had a moderate predictive ability in predicting incident AF.ConclusionsAmong patients with HFpEF, the risk of advanced liver fibrosis is associated with an increased incidence of new-onset AF and may be a novel predictor for new-onset AF. Additional studies are needed to confirm our results.
| S-EPMC9773713 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Device therapy is a nonpharmacological approach that presents a crucial advancement for managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review investigated the impact of device-based interventions and emphasized their potential for optimizing treatment for this complex patient demographic. Cardiac resynchronization therapy, augmented by atrioventricular node ablation with His-bundle pacing or left bundle-branch pacing, is effective for enhancing cardiac function and establishing atrioventricular synchrony. Cardiac contractility modulation and vagus nerve stimulation represent novel strategies for increasing myocardial contractility and adjusting the autonomic balance. Left ventricular expanders have demonstrated short-term benefits in HFpEF patients but require more investigation for long-term effectiveness and safety, especially in patients with AF. Research gaps regarding complications arising from left ventricular expander implantation need to be addressed. Device-based therapies for heart valve diseases, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, show promise for patients with AF and HFpEF, particularly those with mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. Clinical evaluations show that these device therapies lessen AF occurrence, improve exercise tolerance, and boost left ventricular diastolic function. However, additional studies are required to perfect patient selection criteria and ascertain the long-term effectiveness and safety of these interventions. Our review underscores the significant potential of device therapy for improving the outcomes and quality of life for patients with AF and HFpEF.
| S-EPMC10943171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are very common conditions, particularly in the elderly. However, the mechanisms underlying the two disorders, including their intricate interaction have not been fully resolved. Here, our aim is to review the evidence on the role of the two types of senile amyloidosis in this connection. Two types of senile amyloidosis can be identified: wild-type transthyretin (TTR)-derived amyloidosis (ATTRwt) and isolated atrial amyloidosis (IAA). ATTRwt is an underlying condition that is being increasingly recognized in patients with HFpEF and often accompanied by AF. IAA is an established cause of AF, adding to the mechanism problem. New diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities have emerged that may facilitate clinical management of (senile) amyloidosis, which in turn may have implications for the management of HFpEF and AF.
| S-EPMC6553504 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coincide. Female sex is associated with both increased prevalence of HFpEF and reduced therapeutic efficacy of catheter ablation of AF. This sub-analysis of the previously published AFFECT-study evaluates outcome after cryoballoon-ablation in women with and without HFpEF.MethodsOne-hundred-and-two patients (LVEF ≥ 50%) scheduled for cryoballoon-ablation of AF were prospectively enrolled. Forty-two were female. Comprehensive baseline assessment included echocardiography, stress echocardiography, six-minute-walk-test, biomarker- and quality-of-life-assessment (QoL, SF-36), and was repeated at follow-up ≥12 months after AF-ablation. Baseline parameters, procedural characteristics and outcome after AF-ablation were compared between women with and without HFpEF.ResultsWomen with HFpEF (n = 20) were characterized by higher median left atrial volume index (35.8 ml/m2 vs. 25.8 ml/m2, P < 0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (median left ventricular mass index: 92.0 g/m2 vs. 83.0 g/m2, P = 0.027), reduced distance in the 6-min-walk-test (median: 453 m vs. 527 m, P = 0.008) and higher left atrial pressures (median: 14.0 mmHg vs.9.5 mmHg, P = 0.008) compared to women without HFpEF (n = 21). During follow-up, HFpEF-patients more often experienced AF-related re-hospitalization (36.8% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.039) and numerically higher AF-recurrence-rates (57.9% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.109). There was no significant improvement of heart failure-related symptoms, echocardiographic parameters and cardiac biomarkers levels. QoL showed no significant improvement in both subgroups. Women with HFpEF still exhibited a lower SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score vs. women without HFpEF (median: 41.2 vs. 52.1, P < 0.001).ConclusionWomen with HFpEF constitute a distinct subgroup with high rates of AF-related events after AF-ablation, and persistence of both symptoms and functional hallmarks of HFpEF. Consideration of sex-specific cardiac co-morbidities is crucial for personalization and optimization of AF-therapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05603611.
| S-EPMC11586357 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere are few prospective studies assessing the benefits of rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which accounts for 50% of all heart failure patients.ObjectiveConduct a meta-analysis to assess the effects of rhythm control (ablation and/or antiarrhythmic medications) vs rate control on all-cause mortality in AF patients with HFpEF.MethodsDatabases were searched for studies reporting the effect of rhythm control vs rate control on mortality in patients with HFpEF (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL). The search was not restricted to time or publication status. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The minimum duration of follow-up required for inclusion was 1 year.ResultsThe literature search identified 1210 candidate studies; 5 studies and 16,825 patients were included. The study population had 57% men with a mean age of 71± 2.5 years. Rhythm control for AF was associated with lower all-cause mortality (odds ratio 0.735, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.813; P < .001) as compared to rate control.ConclusionRhythm control for AF in patients with HFpEF was associated with decreased all-cause mortality.
| S-EPMC9626734 | biostudies-literature